Top Iraqi Source: In 5 Years Iraq will be a Colony of Iran

blackascoal

The Force is With Me
Behind the Carnage in Baghdad

As security deteriorates in Baghdad, there's a new cause for worry: The head of the U.S.-trained Iraqi National Intelligence Service (INIS) has quit in a long-running quarrel with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki -- depriving that country of a key leader in the fight against sectarian terrorism.

Gen. Mohammed Shahwani, the head of Iraqi intelligence since 2004, resigned this month because of what he viewed as Maliki's attempts to undermine his service and allow Iranian spies to operate freely. The CIA, which has worked closely with Shahwani since he went into exile in the 1990s and has spent hundreds of millions of dollars training the INIS, was apparently caught by surprise by his departure.

The chaotic conditions in Iraq that triggered Shahwani's resignation are illustrated by several recent events -- each of which suggests that without the backstop of U.S. support, Iraqi authorities are now desperately vulnerable to pressure, especially from neighboring Iran.

An early warning was the brazen July 28 robbery of the state-run Rafidain Bank in central Baghdad, apparently by members of an Iraqi security force. Gunmen broke into the bank and stole about 5.6 billion Iraqi dinars, or roughly $5 million. After a battle that left eight dead, the robbers fled to a newspaper run by Adel Abdul Mahdi, one of the country's vice presidents.

Abdul Mahdi, once an American favorite, has admitted that one of the robbers was a member of his security detail but denied personal involvement, according to Iraqi news reports. Some of the money has been recovered, but the rest is believed to be in Iran, along with some members of the robbery team.

A second concern for Shahwani has been threats against his service's roughly 6,000 members. Maliki's government has issued arrest warrants against 180 Iraqi intelligence officers for alleged crimes that, according to Shahwani's camp, are really political reprisals for doing their jobs. Since the INIS was formally created in 2004, 290 of its officers have been killed, many targeted by Iranian intelligence operatives.

With Shahwani's resignation, the intelligence service is commanded by Gen. Zuheir Fadel, a former pilot in Saddam Hussein's air force. But some of Fadel's key officers are said to be fleeing for safety in Jordan, Egypt and Syria -- fearing that they will be targets of Iranian hit teams if they remain in Iraq.

The breakdown of order in Iraq was most dramatic in the truck bombings on Aug. 19 that targeted the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and other agencies, and left more than 100 dead and 500 wounded. Here, again, there is evidence that government security forces may have aided the terrorists.

"I don't rule out that there was collaboration by the security forces," Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said after the bombings. "We have to face the truth. There has been an obvious deterioration in the security situation in the past two months."

Who's to blame for the carnage? In today's Iraq, that's open to sectarian conspiracy theories. Maliki's Shiite-led government last weekend broadcast the alleged confession of a Sunni Baathist named Wisam Ali Khazim Ibrahim, who said the truck-bombing plot had been hatched in Syria and that he had paid security guards $10,000 to pass through checkpoints.

But forensic evidence points to a possible Iranian role, according to an Iraqi intelligence source who is close to Shahwani. He said that signatures of the C-4 explosive residues that have been found at the bomb sites are similar to those of Iranian-made explosives that have been captured in Kut, Nasiriyah, Basra and other Iraqi cities since 2006.

Iran's links with Maliki are so close, said this Iraqi intelligence source, that the prime minister uses an Iranian jet with an Iranian crew for his official travel. The Iranians are said to have sent Maliki an offer to help his Dawa Party win at least 49 seats in January's parliamentary elections if Maliki will make changes in his government that Iran wants.

As security unravels in Iraq, U.S. forces there are mostly bystanders. Even in the areas where al-Qaeda operatives remain potent, such as Mosul, the Americans have little control. Sunni terrorists who are arrested are quickly released by the Iraqis in exchange for bribes of up to $100,000, according to an Iraqi source.

Should the Americans try to restore order? The top Iraqi intelligence source answered sadly that it was probably wiser to "stay out of it and be safe." When pressed about what his country would look like in five years, absent American help, he answered bluntly: "Iraq will be a colony of Iran."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/24/AR2009082402491.html

Good job America .. countless dead innocent people, tens of thousands dead and wounded US soldiers, more than a trillion dollars thrown down the toliet .. and we've accomplished NOTHING .. except handing Iraq to Iran like a wonderful Christmas present.

Now we're off to "save" more innocent people in Afghanistan in yet another failed mission.

Good job America .. land of colonized minds.
 
american's are the colonizers, yet your article is about iran colonizing iraq

The "colonized minds" I'm talking about are American.

Americans were sold a bill of goods in Iraq, Vietnam .. and now Afghanistan.

ALL, as in each and every reason given for the tragedy of Iraq .. as was also true of Vietnam .. was false and made-up bullshit to support the business of war. That same truth is in Afghanistan.

Anyone could have written the end of this story even before the carnage began .. and in fact, I did.

America IS a stupid country.
 
who knows what will happen in Iraq.

As for Afganistan there is a true security risk with allowing the Taliban to succeed in overrunning Pakistan.


Its their goal and they can be beaten.
 
I would not suprise me at all BAC. We removed Sadam who was a big opponent of Iran.

Saddam was our convienient clown .. and when we no longer needed him .. we lynched him .. before he could tell of our involvement in his chemical weapons program.
 
who knows what will happen in Iraq.

As for Afganistan there is a true security risk with allowing the Taliban to succeed in overrunning Pakistan.


Its their goal and they can be beaten.

What will happen in Iraq is as clear as day .. just as it has always been. Iran is the only winner there.

Our presence in Afghanistan only makes the Taliban stronger and recruits more to their cause. History has it own say about whether Afghanistan can be contriolled by foreigners .. which of course is what you're talking about.

AS for Pakistan .. SEE: The ISI.
 
american's are the colonizers, yet your article is about iran colonizing iraq

there were many of us who warned that getting rid of Saddam would only serve to bring a shiite dominated Iraq under the influence of Iran... but Team Bush and their adoring sycophants called us traitors and fools for suggesting that.
 
The taliban is brutal to the afgan people.

They are outnumbered by the people.

They can be defeated.
 
true....back when the war began, the left was predicting Iraq was going to be an American colony......

Naw, all we have is that city sized embassy! and a couple of other permanent bases. No colony, but we couldn't steal their oil, so why bother...
 
true....back when the war began, the left was predicting Iraq was going to be an American colony......

that is bullshit. no one on the left was predicting that Iraq would welcome us with rose petals in front of our tanks... no one on the left was predicting statues of George Bush in every town square throughout Iraq.

The left, for the most part, knew that this would be a shit hole and that removing Saddam would have negative long term effects in the region.... not the least of which would be the inevitable exertion of Iranian influence over a shiite Iraq.
 
true....back when the war began, the left was predicting Iraq was going to be an American colony......

Wrong in My case, I predicted it would be a pretty long quagmire type of thing and would fall back to chaos if or when we left. I was always against the invasion.

the right were the ones thinking it would be a democratic US colony with us welcomed with open arms as liberators.
 
The taliban is brutal to the afgan people.

They are outnumbered by the people.

They can be defeated.

The Taliban are AFGHANIS .. everyone else is an invader .. thus THEY are not supported by the Afghani people .. never have.

“It’s going to be an uphill fight to eradicate the Taliban from Afghanistan and Pakistan,” said Ivan Eeland of the Independent Institute in the US, commenting on Obama’s speech on the mission’s new strategy.

“The US mission in Afghanistan has increased the Taliban’s and militants’ activities in Pakistan. I’m not sure that the actions by the US are stabilizing the situation,” said Eeland.
http://www.russiatoday.com/Politics..._in_Afghanistan_making_Taliban_stronger_.html

Not only is Afghanistan getting deadlier for American troops .. as was the case in Iraq .. the rest of the world (NATO) doesn't believe in this fight and are backing off.

At what point do Americans figure out that war is a racket?

Answer: Never

Beyond the capacity of colonized minds.
 
Wrong in My case, I predicted it would be a pretty long quagmire type of thing and would fall back to chaos if or when we left. I was always against the invasion.

the right were the ones thinking it would be a democratic US colony with us welcomed with open arms as liberators.

Remember the the 'democratic domino effect' theory, whereby the entire middle east was suddenly going to democratise using Iraq as a shining beacon in the darkness?

That went well.
 
Back
Top