Judge Jackson's Hearing Proves That All the Sold-Out GOP Has Left Is Performance Art

bullsnack.

all their questions were valid and appropriate.

Yet she can't answer what a woman is, or her opinion on packing the Supreme Court. That alone makes her unqualified. Especially if she doesn't know what a woman is. What is she if she doesn't know?

I say they should treat her like Kavanough was...
 
Yet she can't answer what a woman is, or her opinion on packing the Supreme Court. That alone makes her unqualified. Especially if she doesn't know what a woman is. What is she if she doesn't know?

I say they should treat her like Kavanough was...

these people are retarded.
 
I agree with you that only the right-wing seem to be making a big deal out of the gender issue. Why is that, right-wingers?

Some on the left are finding, legal ways and legal means, to "harass the Judicature" into doing their Job: The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights were intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral from Inception for a Reason.
 
I'd disagree, they executed their game plan exactly as sketched

It was never about her, she was just the vehicle for them to air what they want to make the "issues" for November's elections; CRT, crime, LGBT, and race, they had more dog whistles going off than a training class in a kennel

What a lyrical and accurate portrayal of that circus act. We can tell from the various RWer threads about the hearings here what their priorities are: child porn, soft on. Woman, what's dat? LSATs, show 'em.
 
Yet she can't answer what a woman is, or her opinion on packing the Supreme Court. That alone makes her unqualified. Especially if she doesn't know what a woman is. What is she if she doesn't know?

I say they should treat her like Kavanough was...

She is not involved in making the court larger. It is not hers to decide and she is certainly not in the planning. Why are you so desperate to find something to bitch about?
Define what a woman is if it is so easy. It is a gotcha question of the lowest order.
 
I agree with you that only the right-wing seem to be making a big deal out of the gender issue. Why is that, right-wingers?

Some on the left are finding, legal ways and legal means, to "harass the Judicature" into doing their Job: The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights were intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral from Inception for a Reason.

If you dont know what a woman is you shouldn't be on the supreme court.
 
She is not involved in making the court larger. It is not hers to decide and she is certainly not in the planning. Why are you so desperate to find something to bitch about?
Define what a woman is if it is so easy. It is a gotcha question of the lowest order.

but she can have an opinion.

That's what judges do, give opinions.

The size of the supreme court is constitutionally mandated, thus, her belief in the constitution matters on the issue.

how fucking dumb are you?
 
She is not involved in making the court larger. It is not hers to decide and she is certainly not in the planning. Why are you so desperate to find something to bitch about?
Define what a woman is if it is so easy. It is a gotcha question of the lowest order.

If you're to ignorant to know what a woman is, it's too late to explain it to you.
 
If you had to ask for the definition of woman, you shouldn't be a Congress person.

If the stupid cunt can't answer the question, she is unfit to be in any court, much less the Supreme Court! Maybe she isn't a woman???
 
Back
Top