SCOTUS opinion leaked: Roe v Wade

FreeSpeech1789 said:
So? That doesn't make it not murder. Tell us what is the philisophical difference between killing a 9 month old that has passed through a woman's vagina and one who hasn't?
Click to expand...

I'm not going to repeat what you've already been told in dozens of posts by LV. You don't believe him and you won't believe me.
 
LV426 said:
Again, I don't open questionable links.

I want actual facts, not what you think is a fact.

THIS contains facts because it's an actual study, not propaganda that swindles the moronic:

Only two sex forms but multiple gender variants: How to explain?
Are sex and gender interchangeable terms? In classical biology, both are sometimes but not always used on an equal basis for some groups of animals. However, for our own species the Homo sapiens, they are not. A major question is why are there only two types of gametes (sperm- and egg cells), two types of sex steroids, (androgens and estrogens in vertebrates, and two types of ecdysteroids in insects), while the reproduction-related behaviour of the gamete producers displays a much greater variability than just two prominent forms, namely heterosexual males and heterosexual females? It indicates that in addition to a few sex-determining genes ( = the first pillar), other factors play a role. A second possible pillar is the still poorly understood cognitive memory system in which electrical phenomena and its association with the plasma membrane membrane-cytoskeletal complex of cells play a major role (learning, imitation and imprinting). This paper advances a third pillar, that hitherto has been almost completely ignored, namely the cellular Ca2+-homeostasis system, more specifically its sex-specific differences. Differential male-female genetics- and hormone-based Ca2+-homeostasis with effects on gender-related processes has been named Calcigender before. It will be argued that it follows from the principles of Ca2+- physiology and homeostasis that all individuals of a sexually reproducing animal population have a personalized gender behaviour. Thus, subdividing gender-behaviours in hetero-, homo-, bi-, trans- etc. which all result from a differential use of the very same basic physiological principles, is too primitive a system that may yield false sociological interpretations.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5824932/
Click to expand...

Lol postmodernist fashionable nonsense, check the footnotes, this hack cites himself and wikipedia 23 times and it's not peer reviewed, shocker. That this bullshit is on a .gov website is only proof that we should never trust "the science" blindly.

And here's his insane conclusion:

"there are probably as many different gender variants as there are sexually reproducing individuals,"

Wow, so we're talking billions upon billions of genders, Jesus Christ are you serious?
 
Last edited:
volsrock said:
Since the woman has all the right to decide keep or not to keep....she should be 100% responsible for that choice!

If I decide to keep my old car, I am 100% responsible for its up keep. My neighbor who helped me work on it is not!
Click to expand...

Bull shit. If a man wants to squirt his seed without protection he's 50% responsible for the consequences.
 
FreeSpeech1789 said:
Or how about we make Father's financially responsible for the children they sire? Oh wait we already do and they have no choice in the matter whatsoever in fact they don't have a say in anything to do with the child after insemination.
Click to expand...

They had the choice to USE A CONDOM before engaging in sex. My position is that both parties use BC each and every time if children aren't wanted. Men aren't allowed to whine "she said she was on the pill."
 
christiefan915 said:
Bull shit. If a man wants to squirt his seed without protection he's 50% responsible for the consequences.
Click to expand...

Who gets pregnant? The man or woman?

The woman should be more responsible! In the BC part of it

What if the woman lies to the man...Oh..I am on birth control ...but not on it
 
Jason the evil twin said:
That's on them not getting a blood test.
Click to expand...

Guess again, Mason.

Man forced to pay child support despite DNA test proving he is not the father

https://www.firstcoastnews.com/arti...ather/77-f0f77af5-409c-40e4-8c6e-3336123e1f85

A Texas man is battling a court order that mandates he must pay tens of thousands in child support for a child whom he did not biologically father and whom he met only once.

In 2003, a child support court in Texas ruled that Gabriel Cornejo, 45, had to pay child support to his ex-girlfriend, who had recently given birth, because she vowed there was no way he wasn’t the rightful dad.

Cornejo, who is currently raising three children of his own and two nephews, claimed he was not made aware of this and only found out about the child support payments last year when a deputy served him with court papers claiming that the state of Texas lists him as having another child. He soon met the minor for the first and only time — describing her as a “wonderful girl” — but after taking a DNA test, learned she was not his after all.

Only Cornejo’s ex-girlfriend and the state still want the $65,000 in back payments.

https://nypost.com/2017/07/23/man-ordered-to-pay-65k-in-child-support-for-kid-who-isnt-his/

Do some research before you open your cum dumpster.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top