uscitizen
Villified User
good lord! a confession!....we may turn you into a conservative after all.....
I am more of a conservative than you are. I never voted for Bush.
good lord! a confession!....we may turn you into a conservative after all.....
I am more of a conservative than you are. I never voted for Bush.
if that's true you didn't vote in two elections.....that makes you LESS conservative than I am.....
HUH?
Bush was the only person on the ballot?
Man I could use some of what you are smoking.
???...well, if you are more conservative than I am, Bush was the only person on the ballot.....you certainly wouldn't have voted for Gore or Kerry.....
but bush was no conservative per many former Bushites.
I can find quotes on here to that effect.
I've said it myself......even then he was more conservative than Gore or Kerry....if you voted for either, you couldn't possibly be more conservative than I am.....
Gore was VP during a period of relatively low debt growth and near balanced budget.
btw I think we are still running under a Bush budget for FY 2009.
That's Physics, Astronomy, Chemistry, Biology and Geology.The natural sciences are phsyics, astronomy, chemistry, and geology. Geologists can directly test their assumptions. Just because they can't directly see it doesn't disprove what they say any more than it disproves the existence of quasars.
Uhh Bush was no conservative either. He was a political reactionary. Which is pretty much what you are too. I'm much closer to being a conservative then you are. Bush and his cohort are the reason why conservatives have abandoned the Republican party in droves and why it's become the party of political reactionaries.I've said it myself......even then he was more conservative than Gore or Kerry....if you voted for either, you couldn't possibly be more conservative than I am.....
Oh that's just a silly comment. There's nothing common about sense. That's one of the all time great oxymorons.Honestly I have to agree with the older gentleman from Kentucky here. Education/College has it limits when not coupled with some common sense. That should be easy to see just by looking at all the educated idiots out there.
The speculation of the size of the oil find.....a best guess-timate by folks more qualified to make that guess-timate than I am, but I doubt that they are exactly right.
You ever live near an oil refinery?some progress recently, though the government keeps trying to block them...
http://www.dailytech.com/SD+Voters+...New+Gas+Refinery+in+32+Years/article11984.htm
http://cbs5.com/business/Chevron.Richmond.refinery.2.674387.html
http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2007/06/a_new_us_refine.html
of course, we all know the only reason refineries aren't being built is that the oil companies want to get rich, right?......
Not to mention the fact that no one in their right mind wants to live anywhere close to an oil refinery.Which changes nothing. What return do you expect to get? The reality is the refineries we have will continue to improve efficiency, a new one is too costly and there would be little return on the investment. When it is cost effective, companies would build new refineries, it isn't the only way one would be built.
Again, have you ever lived next to an oil refinery?no comment on the 1000 permits required to build?.....nothing about the environmentalists filing multiple lawsuits to delay construction?......obviously you only allow one villain per fantasy.....
and again, have you ever lived next to an oil refinery? Cause this is another topic your popping off at the mouth about that you don't really know jack shit about.I wonder how much of that $3 billion is for lawyers to process the 1000 permit applications and defend the multiple lawsuits filed by environmentalists......
Uhh Bush was no conservative either. He was a political reactionary. Which is pretty much what you are too. I'm much closer to being a conservative then you are. Bush and his cohort are the reason why conservatives have abandoned the Republican party in droves and why it's become the party of political reactionaries.
and again, have you ever lived next to an oil refinery? Cause this is another topic your popping off at the mouth about that you don't really know jack shit about.
http://www.dailytech.com/SD+Voters+...New+Gas+Refinery+in+32+Years/article11984.htmVoters in Elk Point, South Dakota, have approved the construction of the nation's first new gasoline refinery in 32 years.
...
Approval for the plant is not yet absolute, however, as legal action continues to bar construction from beginning. According to Ed Cable, the leader of one of the groups opposing construction (my note: Ed Cable was the leader of Save Union County, see below), "We have strategies in place to slow or delay all the permit processes." The first such is a legal challenge to the county's zoning approval, filed in state court.
Hyperion must also win the approval of state and federal regulators, a process that requires over 1,000 separate permit applications and is expected to take several years.
Circuit Judge Steven Jensen said Save Union County cannot stay in the fray because it owns no land that would be affected by the proposed $10 billion Hyperion Resources refinery.