Russia's army could collapse amid huge losses of more than 30,000 troops

you're very concerned about status and virtue signalling. it makes you look weak and retarded. Like a leetle girl.

So you think the reason I make a good income, but save most of it is virtue signaling? Really? Your reality is so different from mine, I have to ask what color is the sky in your reality?
 
So you think the reason I make a good income, but save most of it is virtue signaling? Really? Your reality is so different from mine, I have to ask what color is the sky in your reality?

No. you signalling about your virtues is virtue signalling.

You're a little karen bitch.
 
comparatively, the US lost 58k in Vietnam over 20 years......Russia lost 14k in Afghanistan over 10 years.......the US lost 1400 in Afghanistan over 10 years......Russia has been in Ukraine for 100 days......

The closest post-WWII American comparison I can find is the USA lost almost 40k in 3 years of Korea. Russia has lost almost that number in 3 months. The USA was cycling troops in and out of Korea over that time, so those losses barely effected effective strengths. Russian losses are catastrophic to its fighting strength.

Imagine at the beginning of WWII, Germany had tried to invade Poland, and been pushed back by the Polish. That is about the level of this.
 
Odesa isnt Donbas you moron. Theer are no Russian land forces there
Luhansk almost 100%. Donetsk is getting there. Severodonetsk is almost controlled.
These regions are Russian ties because of geography - before and after the invasion

Substantial parts of New Mexico, southern California, the Rio Grande Valley of Texas have cultural, historic, linguistic ties to Mexico. And in some places, Spanish is the first language. Historically, those areas belonged to Mexico.

Should Mexico invade the United States to recover those territories? And will you be cheering on the Mexican army if they do?
 
yesterday Zelensky ( wanting more and more most NATO advance weapons)
said Donbas could be an "inflection point" in the war. absolutely nothing on the ground supports this
Zelensky is like Biden just spouting BS, and the press never calls either of them on it
on to glorious "victory!" :palm:

Absolutely everything on the ground supports that statement. The current frontline where things are pushing one way or another is in the Donbas. Russia's current campaign is grinding to a halt in the Donbas. Maybe they can power through, which is why Zelenskyy said "could be", but maybe not, which makes it the inflection point.

Zelenskyy did stop the campaign against Kiev and pushed the Russians back. He also stopped the campaign against Odessa, and pushed them back beyond normal artillery range. These are real, but not absolute victories.
 
Washington has been actively backing Kiev during the conflict

Your "news" source is not allowed to call Ukraine a country, nor the invasion of it a war. That tells me it is Russian....

Just looked it up, and I was almost right. The Weekly Blitz is owned by a Bangladeshi criminal who hires it out to the Russians.
 
Absolutely everything on the ground supports that statement. The current frontline where things are pushing one way or another is in the Donbas. Russia's current campaign is grinding to a halt in the Donbas. Maybe they can power through, which is why Zelenskyy said "could be", but maybe not, which makes it the inflection point.

Zelenskyy did stop the campaign against Kiev and pushed the Russians back. He also stopped the campaign against Odessa, and pushed them back beyond normal artillery range. These are real, but not absolute victories.

did you go over there and see it?
 
Substantial parts of New Mexico, southern California, the Rio Grande Valley of Texas have cultural, historic, linguistic ties to Mexico. And in some places, Spanish is the first language. Historically, those areas belonged to Mexico.

Should Mexico invade the United States to recover those territories? And will you be cheering on the Mexican army if they do?

There are millions of Hispanic Americans who would fight a Mexican invasion of the USA tooth and nail. They may speak Spanish at home, and may have many links to Mexican culture, but they feel strongly American.

Puerto Ricans almost all speak Spanish, but they also fight for America in great numbers in our wars.
 
It must be a terrible burden , taking 20% of the enemy's country and looking to make it 30% by the end of June. No wonder the Russians are failing and the victorious Ukrainians have worn out the reverse gears of their vehicles.

The Brit maggot- in case you need reminding- has been reporting the sinking of Russian ships that aren't sunk and the killing of Russian generals who ain't dead.
Why don't you people at least try to report something truthful instead of waving your pathetic keyboard banners and rooting for Ukrainians who are at least as guilty- if not more so - than the Russians for this environmental catastrophe.

I really don't know whats going in ukraine, fog of war and all that.

There are satellites with lazer capabilities, but they're not particularly jewish that i know of.

Kosher satellites, does that mean they can't be used on the Sabbath?
 
Odessa is Russian speaking, Russia attempted to seize it, and has been fought off tooth and nail. Therefore, Russian speaking Ukrainians fought off Russians tooth and nail. The parts of the Donbas that are not occupied have been very difficult for the Russians to occupy, because the Russian speakers there have fought them off tooth and nail.

Even the local Russian speaking warlords in the Donbas have been lukewarm about joining Russia. Part of that is they do not want to lose power, but another part is they do not feel completely Russian.



The whole of Ukraine has Russian ties, but the Russians are taking huge losses in occupying the territory. The Ukrainians do not want them to take over the Ukraine. That goes for all the Ukrainian speaking Ukrainians, and a surprising number of Russian speaking Ukrainians.



There were many Spanish speaking Hispanics living in what is now Texas and most of them fought against López de Santa Anna.
 
Sure- here we go again;

The Ukrainians, even prior to 2014, knew that Ukraine joining with NATO- or even with the EU- was a red line for Russia. NATO also knew- the whole world knew. It was posted in the sky with fireworks- ' Thou shalt NOT join NATO, or the EU ' because the former is an existential threat to Russia ( which no sane country would allow ) and the latter will, inevitably, lead to the former. NATO promised NOT to advance eastwards yet did so nonetheless. NATO's word is shit. In short, Russia's security will always come before Ukraine's western ambitions- just as American security will always come before Cuba's pro-Russian ambitions.
So the Ukrainian elections of 2014 returned a pro-Russian president. The US/NATO, in its greed for world domination, overthrew that president by way of a coup. Bad idea. Illegal idea. Russia-threatening idea. Ukrainian pro-Russian bad, bad idea.
So there's the aggression, for starters. The anti-Russian Ukrainians rejoiced at this illegal act and proceeded to hunt and kill pro-Russian Ukrainians. There's the manifestation of that aggression and Ukraine, after the US/NATO, is to blame. I'll assume that you know what happened after the coup. Part of your memory of events might include the packing of Ukrainian trade-unionists into a hall and burning them alive.
Maybe that isn't aggression in your book- Russians saw it differently. Me too.

You have a point but stretched it too far. Ukraine wanted to join NATO but NATO demurred, and Ukraine has given up its NATO aspiration. In addition, NATO as Russia knows, is strictly a defensive alliance, unlike the implicit threat posed to the U.S. by the importation of missiles to Cuba. Why Putin wouldn't love it even at the hypothetical stage where it was, is understandable. Why he would go to war over it isn't, not on the surface anyway. The other explanation is that the NATO issue is a ruse, that Putin had something different in mind.
 
You have a point but stretched it too far. Ukraine wanted to join NATO but NATO demurred, and Ukraine has given up its NATO aspiration. In addition, NATO as Russia knows, is strictly a defensive alliance, unlike the implicit threat posed to the U.S. by the importation of missiles to Cuba. Why Putin wouldn't love it even at the hypothetical stage where it was, is understandable. Why he would go to war over it isn't, not on the surface anyway. The other explanation is that the NATO issue is a ruse, that Putin had something different in mind.

ukraine wanted to join nato so they elected a pro russian president?
 
Nah- I can't see you following the bison and preserving the natural environment for future tribes -people, paleface. You're a fucking menace to America. Go home.

The cost of my hunting licenses, tags, stamps, etc. pays for conservation, stupid foreigner.
I'd be willing to bet I've seen and appreciated more of nature while hunting in my environment than you have seen in yours.
I'm an American. And damn proud of it. Fuck you and where you come from. You're vermin.
 
There were many Spanish speaking Hispanics living in what is now Texas and most of them fought against López de Santa Anna.

Half the defenders of the Alamo were Spanish speakers, but many of the descendants live now in Mexico. They fought for Texas Independence, and then for America in the Mexican American War, but then were kicked out of America by the non-Hispanic whites. It was a betrayal.

Santa Anna's descendant who keeps his name alive is an American citizen. Life is strange that way.
 
It must be a terrible burden , taking 20% of the enemy's country and looking to make it 30% by the end of June. No wonder the Russians are failing and the victorious Ukrainians have worn out the reverse gears of their vehicles.

The Brit maggot- in case you need reminding- has been reporting the sinking of Russian ships that aren't sunk and the killing of Russian generals who ain't dead.
Why don't you people at least try to report something truthful instead of waving your pathetic keyboard banners and rooting for Ukrainians who are at least as guilty- if not more so - than the Russians for this environmental catastrophe.

You are mistaken. Bulgaria and Romania became members in 2007. So it started in 2004, and they were members in 2007. Once they were members, it became unavoidable that they would get full rights to move to other EU members, but those rights took 7 years to come about. Ukrainians already have those rights (on a temporary basis).

Technically speaking, after 60 years, Turkey is still a candidate. No one has had the heart to tell Turkey it will never happen, and Turkey is unwilling to totally give up.



Scotland was already in the EU, so could join. It would take time. The EU is not happy about Brexit.

Fuck the EU, we are not happy about the EU. The situation changes markedly if Scotland tries to reenter the EU. One, they have a huge deficit of 22%, that was in 2021 probably a lot worse now, two, they won't be able to join the Eurozone and the Bank Of England will not give them any concessions regarding the pound.
 
The cost of my hunting licenses, tags, stamps, etc. pays for conservation, stupid foreigner.
I'd be willing to bet I've seen and appreciated more of nature while hunting in my environment than you have seen in yours.
I'm an American. And damn proud of it. Fuck you and where you come from. You're vermin.

You'd better disinfect your tongue, paleface.



Haw, haw...............................haw.
 
You have a point but stretched it too far. Ukraine wanted to join NATO but NATO demurred, and Ukraine has given up its NATO aspiration. In addition, NATO as Russia knows, is strictly a defensive alliance, unlike the implicit threat posed to the U.S. by the importation of missiles to Cuba. Why Putin wouldn't love it even at the hypothetical stage where it was, is understandable. Why he would go to war over it isn't, not on the surface anyway. The other explanation is that the NATO issue is a ruse, that Putin had something different in mind.

Your misinformation appears entrenched, martin. Sorry- but you can only lead a horse to water...................
 
Can you believe it ! The Russian army is STILL retreating in the wrong direction !

What a pack of dumbasses, eh maggot.


_125021672_u3foofk0.png
 
Back
Top