Why would I deny, it's just amazing. Send me a copy of your book.Hugo Chavez have many, many, American friend who know truth.
According to Hugo Chavez profile, Damocles in love with Hugo Chavez magnetic personality. Do you deny this truth?
Why would I deny, it's just amazing. Send me a copy of your book.Hugo Chavez have many, many, American friend who know truth.
According to Hugo Chavez profile, Damocles in love with Hugo Chavez magnetic personality. Do you deny this truth?
Why would I deny, it's just amazing. Send me a copy of your book.
And you ma'am are a fucking dishonest liar.
Are radio stations, videos, music, churches, and all manner of nutcase media not consider PUBLIC in the fucking bizarro world you exist in? Of course that shit is PUBLIC and there are a shitload of racist vermin who practice and profess white supremist racism everyday. You don't condemn it because you only see racism in non-white people .. as evidenced by your self-induced ignorance of all-too obvious PUBLICLY spoken white racism.
Here's a clue .. I don't give a rat's ass about what something like you thinks about me. I'm black, thus I must be a racist, as Obama .. who I did not vote for .. must be a racist. Anyone who dare talk about the 364 years of overt, demonic, and ungodly racism that is the history of this country, must be a racist in your small mind. 400 years of existence in America and only relatively free for 44 years, and you believe that anyone and everyone who talks about the dynamics of that must be a racist.
You'd fare much better just talking to the other racist morons on this board than any attempt in talking to me. I don't have much stomach for shit like you and I don't really care how you take my disgust of lying ass comments.
You are a nut. A fucking nut. An angry fucking nut. An angry paranoid racist fucking nut. Get help brother.
![]()
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
No pretense about it, kid. The US and Venezuela have had a LONG history going back to the early 1900's. Given that Venezuela is a member of OPEC and has a thriving business on US soil (i.e., Citgo) to the point where they were able to offer reduced heating oil rates to American customers where AMERICAN companies did not, it's childish to try and dismiss the machinations of what went down during the 2002 attempted coupe
http://www.democracynow.org/2004/11/...w_bush_knew_of
http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/1576
Now you're either lying to yourself or trying to pass that lie off as a truth to others. The chronology testifies differently....and to date you cannot disprove what I state, or create a valid disconnect from past to present. Where not talking about a century here, but a matter of less than 20 years. Your stubborness is reaching a point of insipidness...but that is not unusual for you.Again. Long history notwithstanding, pointing out what is happening elsewhere is not suggesting a solution. Nobody here suggested anything they just report that tens of thousands are protesting his regime.
You keep repeating yourself while ignoring all pertinent information. Bottom line: A MISLEADING report reaches American shores about an OPEC nation with a thriving gasoline distributing chain in American lead by a democratically elected leader that criticizes America's imperialist history in South America who is NOT liked by the American right wing/conservative factions of gov't and business...factions that whole heartedly supported the oligarchy the preceeded Chavez.
No one here suggested anything other than the FACTS, that you have
factions both Venezuelan and American that would like to see Chavez gone, and who benefit from distorted and misleading press. For you you to pretend that pointing out these facts deserves some sort of challenge is confusing, as you clearly have no true point to make other than you don't like defense of Chavez to any degree.
You are being directly and deliberately disingenuous to suggest that the history is the same as presently suggesting a solution.
One more time, mostly because I like pointing out that the strawman is falling apart. Nobody here suggested we do anything about Chavez in any way. No matter how much text you use that fact still remains. Suggesting that anybody here means to suggest we should do something about it when they simply post a news story is pretense based on your effort to be an apologist.Now you're either lying to yourself or trying to pass that lie off as a truth to others. The chronology testifies differently....and to date you cannot disprove what I state, or create a valid disconnect from past to present. Where not talking about a century here, but a matter of less than 20 years. Your stubborness is reaching a point of insipidness...but that is not unusual for you.
Go right ahead.....if you're going to honestly use articles that cover several countries and directly say so....unlike the one I pointed out didn't.One more time. No....no more of your repetitive bullshit. You're wrong...and you can repeat yourself six ways to Sunday...it doesn't matter. You cannot logically or factually erase the recent US/Venezuelan history or it's relevance to the current misleading news item...or it's significance.
Now let's talk about the tens of thousands protesting this "incredibly popular" leader in Venezuela.
I'm not wrong. Nobody suggested we do anything in Venezuela, no matter how many times you say they have. If somebody had I'm sure you could have linked me up to that post by now.Go right ahead.....if you're going to honestly use articles that cover several countries and directly say so....unlike the one I pointed out didn't.
Say goodnight gracie....shows over for you.
And he posted this here and because of this story? Thanks for the non sequitur.Pat Robertson said we should assinate Hugo.
What? This makes no sense it links to a discussion of the Prince in Afghanistan, and to a post by Darla...
What? This makes no sense it links to a discussion of the Prince in Afghanistan, and to a post by Darla...
![]()
And you ma'am are a fucking dishonest liar.
Are radio stations, videos, music, churches, and all manner of nutcase media not consider PUBLIC in the fucking bizarro world you exist in? Of course that shit is PUBLIC and there are a shitload of racist vermin who practice and profess white supremist racism everyday. You don't condemn it because you only see racism in non-white people .. as evidenced by your self-induced ignorance of all-too obvious PUBLICLY spoken white racism.
Here's a clue .. I don't give a rat's ass about what something like you thinks about me. I'm black, thus I must be a racist, as Obama .. who I did not vote for .. must be a racist. Anyone who dare talk about the 364 years of overt, demonic, and ungodly racism that is the history of this country, must be a racist in your small mind. 400 years of existence in America and only relatively free for 44 years, and you believe that anyone and everyone who talks about the dynamics of that must be a racist.
You'd fare much better just talking to the other racist morons on this board than any attempt in talking to me. I don't have much stomach for shit like you and I don't really care how you take my disgust of lying ass comments.
:0)
"Angry black man" is loose.
You have no idea how much fun this is.
Sticking the cyber boot up your ass while I work .. shit this must be heaven.
:0)
:0)
"Angry black man" is loose.
You have no idea how much fun this is.
Sticking the cyber boot up your ass while I work .. shit this must be heaven.
:0)
Yeah, nothing like them cutting off the nose to spite the face!
Blatant racism.I love when BAC crushes a cracker on the foolishness of white trash people calling blacks racist.
One more time, mostly because I like pointing out that the strawman is falling apart. Nobody here suggested we do anything about Chavez in any way. No matter how much text you use that fact still remains. Suggesting that anybody here means to suggest we should do something about it when they simply post a news story is pretense based on your effort to be an apologist.
This would be like somebody posting a story about finding some historical item from the civil war and you saying that meant they supported slavery because in the past there was slavery. One doesn't follow the other, even if in the past actions by the US were taken it doesn't make a news story mean that we wish for a return to that past.
Basically, no matter how many times you try to bring up the straw man of "suggesting" that posting an article means suggestion action in Venezuela it actually doesn't mean that and you just try to distract because you are an apologist hack.
Now let's talk about the tens of thousands protesting this "incredibly popular" leader in Venezuela.