Stiglitz Says Banking Problems Are Now Bigger Than Pre-Lehman

blackascoal

The Force is With Me
Banking problems worse than before Lehman crash

Sept. 13 (Bloomberg) -- Joseph Stiglitz, the Nobel Prize- winning economist, said the U.S. has failed to fix the underlying problems of its banking system after the credit crunch and the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

“In the U.S. and many other countries, the too-big-to-fail banks have become even bigger,” Stiglitz said in an interview today in Paris. “The problems are worse than they were in 2007 before the crisis.”

Stiglitz’s views echo those of former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, who has advised President Barack Obama’s administration to curtail the size of banks, and Bank of Israel Governor Stanley Fischer, who suggested last month that governments may want to discourage financial institutions from growing “excessively.”

A year after the demise of Lehman forced the Treasury Department to spend billions to shore up the financial system, Bank of America Corp.’s assets have grown and Citigroup Inc. remains intact. In the U.K., Lloyds Banking Group Plc, 43 percent owned by the government, has taken over the activities of HBOS Plc, and in France BNP Paribas SA now owns the Belgian and Luxembourg banking assets of insurer Fortis.

While Obama wants to name some banks as “systemically important” and subject them to stricter oversight, his plan wouldn’t force them to shrink or simplify their structure.

Stiglitz said the U.S. government is wary of challenging the financial industry because it is politically difficult, and that he hopes the Group of 20 leaders will cajole the U.S. into tougher action.

G-20 Steps

“We aren’t doing anything significant so far, and the banks are pushing back,” he said. “The leaders of the G-20 will make some small steps forward, given the power of the banks” and “any step forward is a move in the right direction.”

G-20 leaders gather next week in Pittsburgh and will consider ways of improving regulation of financial markets and in particular how to set tighter limits on remuneration for market operators. Under pressure from France and Germany, G-20 finance ministers last week reached a preliminary accord that included proposals to claw-back cash awards and linking compensation more closely to long-term performance.

“It’s an outrage,” especially “in the U.S. where we poured so much money into the banks,” Stiglitz said. “The administration seems very reluctant to do what is necessary. Yes they’ll do something, the question is: Will they do as much as required?”

Global Economy

Stiglitz, former chief economist at the World Bank and member of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said the world economy is “far from being out of the woods” even if it has pulled back from the precipice it teetered on after the collapse of Lehman.

“We’re going into an extended period of weak economy, of economic malaise,” Stiglitz said. The U.S. will “grow but not enough to offset the increase in the population,” he said, adding that “if workers do not have income, it’s very hard to see how the U.S. will generate the demand that the world economy needs.”

The Federal Reserve faces a “quandary” in ending its monetary stimulus programs because doing so may drive up the cost of borrowing for the U.S. government, he said.

“The question then is who is going to finance the U.S. government,” Stiglitz said.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aYdgQkXu9eBg#
 
One Year of Bankster Bailouts and Meltdown Madness

Happy Meltdown Day

OK, not so "happy."

But this is the anniversary of the collapse of the house of cards that was Lehman Brothers.

One year ago today, the economic time bomb that George Bush and Dick Cheney had spent two terms constructing – on a platform of deregulations furnished by Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich – blew up. The explosion created the deepest economic downturn since the Great Depression. And it sent unemployment rates soaring to the highest levels in a quarter century.

It also created an opening that the worst players on Wall Street and on Capitol Hill have used to allocate trillions of dollars in US assets to multinational corporations and banks.

According to the New York Times, "government spending [now] accounts for a bigger share of the nation's economy – 26 percent – than at any time since World War II." Deficits are right, debt is up. Teabaggers are screaming. But it is not programs that care for the children of immigrants or aid to poor countries that emptied the Treasury, and it is not the "threat" of healthcare reform that worries serious economists.

It is the fact that the federal government has become "the guarantor against risk for investors large and small" while doing little to restrain CEO greed or to protect the citizens, consumers and communities that have been battered by banksters.

Things have not gone well over this past year, despite what "reluctant shareholder" Barack Obama is doing his best to suggest with an anniversary-marking presidential visit to Wall Street. Obama talks about the federal interventions on behalf of behemoth banks and colossal corporations as temporary and he talks up the need for more oversight of banks and financial institutions. Those are both good messages, and the president delivers them well. But his fine rhetoric is a tad unsettling, as it follows upon so many opportunities that have been missed and so many mistakes that have been made.

The reckoning that was supposed to come for banks that were "too big to fail" has instead made them bigger. CEO salaries and bonuses are going up. The bailout of the auto industry is shuttering factories, closing dealerships and laying off workers as US tax dollars fund the export of production to foreign countries. And prospects for a real reform of our economy seem almost as slim today as they did when Dick Cheney and Tom DeLay were bartering away the country to the highest bidder.

What to do?

There is nothing much to celebrate this day.

So let's get down to the "business" of recognizing mistakes, setting agendas and listening to the truth tellers:

FIRST, remember those members of Congress who rejected the bailout. Dozens of Democrats and Republicans in the House and Senate voted "no" last fall, despite enormous pressure from the economic, media and political elites to approve the blank checks that got the US government into the business of buying "toxic assets."

Here are the voting records:


For the House.

For the Senate.


Don't let any member of Congress who voted "yes" for the bailout try to tell you that they are "fiscally responsible" or "on your side." They did Wall Street's bidding at a time when responsible members on the right and left refused to go along.

SECOND, listen to a senator who got things right.

Vermont Independent Bernie Sanders voted against the bailout and says that, instead of blank checks, banksters should be getting subpoenas and jail time.

Here is Sanders outlining his proposals to restructure companies that are supposedly "too big to fail," reform the Federal Reserve, and cap credit card interest rates.

THIRD, read Nomi Prins.

A former Goldman Sachs insider, Prins quit Wall Street the better part of a decade ago to started telling the secrets of the temple.

Her books warned about the speculation, the dirty deals and the dangers inherent in the decline of regulation.

A fellow with Demos think tank, Prins keeps tabs on the cost of the bailout to taxpayers and society at her website.

She writes that it is "Time to Do Something About ‘Too Big to Fail' Banks."

And her new book, just out, has the best title and the best analysis of the meltdown and the raid on the Treasury that followed: It Takes a Pillage: Behind the Bailouts, Bonuses and Backroom Deals from Washington to Wall Street.
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat/472630/one_year_of_bankster_bailouts_and_meltdown_madness
 
Instead of letting bankers face some pain (everybody else is) politicians who've had their pockets lined by bankers are bailing them out at our kids expense.
Obama = much more of the same

big corp payoffs
big wars for the military industrial complex
 
We've got idiots like Geithner and Bernake at the helm, when what we need to some true liberals who will regulate the fuck out of these robber barons.
 
Instead of letting bankers face some pain (everybody else is) politicians who've had their pockets lined by bankers are bailing them out at our kids expense.
Obama = much more of the same

big corp payoffs
big wars for the military industrial complex

I hate to say I told you so .. aww bullshit, no I don't.

I told you so.
 
We've got idiots like Geithner and Bernake at the helm, when what we need to some true liberals who will regulate the fuck out of these robber barons.

But you have Obama as President .. who is not a liberal and has precious few of them anywhere near him.

... as I predicted.
 
Hey now tennis twinkie, I saw this coming, you were saying the economy is great and the parking lots are still full.

the Louisiana economy is and that's what I based it on. Doesn't take a genius to see I was wrong.
Nobody knew of the size and extent of the fraud on wall street.
Trust me, I want more regulation than any dems are calling for.
Corp governance is a buzzword created a couple years back that needs a steroid injection. I have been calling for more shareholder rights vs boards for years. The CEO's & board culture have been killing us. Unlike the uneducated G&D crowd I don't call for throwing the baby out with the bathwater. The workers at the top 500 companies are great, I just can't say the same about the top execs.
 
Back
Top