So much for the Wilson effect...

I got out Saturday and watched the pathetic little teabagger parade for laughs. Thanks for asking.
 
Can someone point me to the rules regarding which polls are deemed to be credible and when? I can't for the life of me figure it all out. Last I recall, Rasmussen was, like, the totally only reliable public opinion polling outfit out there. But then Rasmussen reported thusly:



And now we hear nothing about the oh-so-reliable Rasmussen and instead we get the Washington Post/ABC poll. And another interesting thing about the WaPO/ABC poll, is that you won't hear about this:

trust.jpg



That's right, when asked who they trusted to handle health care, the economy and the deficit, Obama is trusted much much more than the Republicans.

Instead of picking and choosing which polls to trust and when, I think it quite clear that while polling on an election is fairly easy, polling on issues is at best sketchy and you really shouldn't put much stock in them either way.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub.../healthcare/september_2009/health_care_reform

and back down to earth we come.... no wonder Obama is out pitching his plan again and again and again today to his various union supporters... he is once again seeing support fade....
 
So Rasmussen is reputable again? Thanks for the notice. Can I get a copy of those rules though?

Tell you what... please show me where I ever stated they were not reputable.

I started this thread based on the story I read. Then you added to the conversation by showing me the latest Rasmussen. I then discussed that with you as well.

So tell me.... when did I ever state they were not reputable? All I did was post some of their data results and discuss why I thought it would come back down once people came down from the rhetoric of Obama.

Now we see that it has indeed come back down. Imagine that.
 
Back
Top