The law is to be interpreted by the judge, Pobre, not some slug like you.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Indictments Coming for Trump and His Aides
- Thread starter martin
- Start date
The law is to be interpreted by the judge, Pobre, not some slug like you.
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
"What will the implications be for November’s midterms?
Even if federal agents find material evidence against Trump, it’s hard to envision the FBI raid not unleashing the full fury of MAGA voters. In terms of the elections, that could have two implications. The first relates to which Republican candidates make it through the primaries. Already, MAGA Republicans have had considerable success in securing their party’s nominations. In the remaining primaries, right-wing candidates will leverage what happened at Mar-a-Lago to further energize and build support among the conservative base. That’s likely to be effective because primary voters tend to lean more Trumpian. The consequences for the general election, by contrast, seem less clear. The worst-case scenario for Democrats, however, is that Republicans marshal the Mar-a-Lago raid to initiate a maelstrom of anti-Biden energy by making Trump a martyr. The more Republicans are told that the White House is corrupt and out to take down Trump, the greater strength of the backlash we can probably expect in the form of increased GOP turnout."
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2...-support-for-trump-among-the-republican-base/
I just spoke with an ultra-conservative neighbor who has NEVER wavered in his support for Trump. I asked what he thought of reports that Trump may have been hiding top-secret nuclear documents at Mar-a-Lago, and he said “If that’s true, I’m done with him. Treason’s my red line.”
I guess treason isn't enough for you to stop sucking Trump's Dick. Right?
The law is to be interpreted by the judge, Pobre, not some slug like you.
The judge can't add words that aren't in the law to the law.
I just spoke with an ultra-conservative neighbor who has NEVER wavered in his support for Trump. I asked what he thought of reports that Trump may have been hiding top-secret nuclear documents at Mar-a-Lago, and he said “If that’s true, I’m done with him. Treason’s my red line.”
I guess treason isn't enough for you to stop sucking Trump's Dick. Right?
Sure you spoke with an ultra-conservative neighbor...suuure (sic) you did.
I spoke with 44 million neighbors and they...
Lol
The judge can't add words that aren't in the law to the law.
He interprets the law, not you, Pobre.
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
Sure you spoke with an ultra-conservative neighbor...suuure (sic) you did.
I spoke with 44 million neighbors and they...
Lol
I guess treason isn't enough for you to stop sucking Trump's Dick Right?
Last edited:
Just your opinion, Pobre.
No better or worse than the other slugs on this forum.
Well, no, Early. The post wasn't a statement of his opinion, Pobre. Try reading it again. Even your simple minded argument on declassification is incorrect. An ex-president doesn't wipe away evidence of hoarding classified documents by saying, "Oh, I took care of that, didn't I tell you." And even you should be able to grasp the fact that classification of the documents found in his house isn't the only issue - in fact none of the three federal statutes he’s suspected of criminally violating require classified status as an element of all covered offenses. And assuming for the sake of argument Trump was entitled to declassify in the way he says he did, even documents containing nuclear secrets, the documents are still property of the government. Especially those documents.
Last edited:
He interprets the law, not you, Pobre.
Actually, he doesn't interpret the law. He decides if the crime alleged fits the law.
You have no clue as to where the documents were declassified, pendejo.Well, no, Early. The post wasn't a statement of his opinion, Pobre. Try reading it again. Even your simple minded argument on declassification is incorrect. An ex-president doesn't wipe away evidence of hoarding classified documents by saying, "Oh, I took care of that, didn't I tell you." And even you should be able to grasp the fact that classification of the documents in his house isn't the only issue. Even if Trump was entitled to declassify in the way he says he did it top secrets, even documents containing nuclear data, the documents remain property of the government. Especially those documents.
No clue.
Actually, he doesn't interpret the law. He decides if the crime alleged fits the law.
Well, no, Pobre, he has to interpret the law to determine if it applies...in the case before him.
Well, no, Pobre, he has to interpret the law to determine if it applies...in the case before him.
ROFLMAO.. so the judge has to interpret the law every time a case comes before him? OMG. It would seem a simple understanding of the English language would mean you don't have to interpret something over and over and over and over and over.
Too bad that the law doesn't require the document be classified for it to be a crime. In fact the 3 crimes listed in the search warrant don't require a classified document for a crime to occur.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1519
By failing to turn over the documents when subpoenaed, Trump attempted to conceal them. There is no requirement that the documents be classified.
What "Federal investigations and bankruptcy" retard?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071
Trump took documents that were supposed to be given to the National Archives. That would mean he removed them and then by not turning them over under subpoena he concealed them. There is no requirement that the documents be classified.
The GAO packed his boxes moron
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793
So Trump could legally have the document, (not likely since the Presidential records act says he can't) but if he showed it to anyone not authorized to see it he committed a felony.
The FBI requested surveillance video from when Kash Patel was at Mar-a-Lago. Kash claims to have seem some of those documents.
Trump also retained the documents and failed to turn them over to an employee of the United States, the National Archives, entitled to receive the documents. There is no requirement that the documents be classified for this to be a crime.
A person "authorized to see it" is anyone the President deems authorized to see it moron. He is the Commander in Chief, who do you think makes that authorization above him?
Well, no, Pobre, he has to interpret the law to determine if it applies...in the case before him.
In reality, most judges leave it up to the jury to decide whether the facts of the alleged crime violate the law.
A person "authorized to see it" is anyone the President deems authorized to see it moron. He is the Commander in Chief, who do you think makes that authorization above him?
Trump is not President while living at Mar-a-Lago. He has no power to authorize anyone to view a classified document.
ROFLMAO.. so the judge has to interpret the law every time a case comes before him? OMG. It would seem a simple understanding of the English language would mean you don't have to interpret something over and over and over and over and over.
Well, no, Pobre, he has to interpret the law to determine if it applies...in the case before him.
I see why you have your appellation...Pobre.
Poor in intellect, poor in debate.
Trump is not President while living at Mar-a-Lago. He has no power to authorize anyone to view a classified document.
They were declassified, Pobre...concentrate...declassified.
Well, no, Pobre, he has to interpret the law to determine if it applies...in the case before him.
I see why you have your appellation...Pobre.
Poor in intellect, poor in debate.
So your argument is that when he interprets the law he can add any word he wants?
So your argument is that when he interprets the law he can add any word he wants?
Well, no, Pobre, he has to interpret the law to determine if it applies...in the case before him.
Lose the pathetic straw-men, Pobre.
Wrong, Pobre, President Trump was president while at Mar-a-Largo or anywhere else in the world.Trump is not President while living at Mar-a-Lago. He has no power to authorize anyone to view a classified document.
You have no clue as to when the de-classification happened.
No clue.