Torture impairs ability to tell the truth

I can't make up my mind if the left are traitors or just plain stupid.

6a00d10a787cb48bfa00f48cf0d4f50003-500pi
 
I can't make up my mind if the left are traitors or just plain stupid.

Because they demand that the USA abide by what they signed agreeing to abide by?

Or because they outted the people who decided to ignore the rules?
 
Obviously I'm referring to two definitions. One by the UN, and one by Merriam-Webster. In the case of terrorists, the CIA used the dictionary definition and did not cross that line.

in other words, you're comfortable with modifying a definition of anything to suit your agenda. that works for anyone, right?
 
in other words, you're comfortable with modifying a definition of anything to suit your agenda. that works for anyone, right?
As stated earlier, I am comfortable with making terrorists uncomfortable in order to save the lives of US soldiers and innocent people.
 
As stated earlier, I am comfortable with making terrorists uncomfortable in order to save the lives of US soldiers and innocent people.

so, lets make your statement perfectly clear. You feel perfectly fine with denying constitutional rights to anyone the government declares a terrorist.
 
Foreign terrorists don't have US Constitutional rights.

where in the US Constitution does it specify that non US citizens are not afforded rights?

and you dodged the question.

lets try it again:

You feel perfectly fine with denying constitutional rights to anyone the government declares a terrorist?
 
where in the US Constitution does it specify that non US citizens are not afforded rights?

and you dodged the question.

lets try it again:

You feel perfectly fine with denying constitutional rights to anyone the government declares a terrorist?
I answered your irrelevant question in the best way possible: by clarifying my position accurately.

Are you asserting that the US Constitution applies to non-citizens of the US? :)
 
iow....no treaty has specifically said waterboarding...i thought you were saying a treaty specifically said waterboarding

did we or did we not condemn waterboarding as torture when the Japanese used it?

did we or did we not prosecute Japanese officers who used waterboarding?
 
did we or did we not condemn waterboarding as torture when the Japanese used it?

did we or did we not prosecute Japanese officers who used waterboarding?

we did condemn and prosecute that specific type of waterboarding....what has that to do with me clarifying solitary's words that waterboarding is specifically mentioned in a treaty?
 
did we or did we not condemn waterboarding as torture when the Japanese used it?

did we or did we not prosecute Japanese officers who used waterboarding?
Are you trying to make a comparison betwixt the CIA's recent use of the technique on foreign terrorists with the Japanese technique on lawful soldiers during WW2?

Please tell me what, if anything, these two scenarios have in common. :)
 
Are you trying to make a comparison betwixt the CIA's recent use of the technique on foreign terrorists with the Japanese technique on lawful soldiers during WW2?

Please tell me what, if anything, these two scenarios have in common. :)

they are both human beings. granted, one is a lower form of it, but that matters little.
 
Are you trying to make a comparison betwixt the CIA's recent use of the technique on foreign terrorists with the Japanese technique on lawful soldiers during WW2?

Please tell me what, if anything, these two scenarios have in common. :)

easy... waterboarding is torture in both scenarios.
 
Back
Top