Mark Morford: How to talk to complete idiots

froggie said:
Well, I guess it is just your perspective, isn't it. I rather think Ms. Maddow is funny and quite brilliant. A very good entertainer and she knows her facts, even though that seems to irate you. I don't watch her on TV much, but I use to listen to her on radio.
Click to expand...

maddow lost what little credibility she had left when she took a relatively interesting story and chopped the one picture she used to develop it in to a race baiting campaign about white supremacists carrying guns to Obama events.

after edit.

my apologies to rachel maddow. I was actually referring to contessa brewer.
 
Last edited:
AssHatZombie said:
And Im just telling you her advice is bad. It advises you to just present facts as the gospel. You will just end up looking bad when you get your facts questioned effectively. Which will happen.

You suck at debating. Not because the masses are too stupid to get your genius, but because your thoughts are not your own, but are the product of a lifetime of being brainwashed.
Click to expand...
He tells us in one post to get both sides of the story and then in this post he says something entirely different, I knew "they" were confused but I didn't realize just how badly until now.

A little dissonance?
 
froggie said:
Notice the responses!
Click to expand...


I found them interesting as well. After all, did I mention any specific names on JPP as examples? Not a one. Assbite is definitely someone i thought of when I read Morford's piece. And Yurt, of course, but for the most part, I respect posters like cawacko, damocles, SouthernMan, all three of whom I also like, and i am mostly neutral on the rest, not having had all that many run-ins with most of them, so I was surprised at some of the responses: can we assume then, that they know they're posting arguments that are factually inaccurate and logically suspect?

Vedddy eenteresting...goodnight lucy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top