Into the Night
Verified User
You can't wish the evidence away, dude. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
gfm7175's "battle for senate" and "battle for house" projections
- Thread starter gfm7175
- Start date
You can't wish the evidence away, dude. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Into the Night
Verified User
Buzzword fallacies (QAnon movement, cornered, FBI official, desperation). Chanting.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
https://thefederalist.com/2022/09/2...senate-race-to-maintain-a-gop-he-can-control/
I am shocked of course.
NOT.
Into the Night
Verified User
Denial of logic. They are YOUR fallacies. YOU are the one making them. I'm just calling you out on them.
No, you can't make the evidence of election fraud disappear that way!
No such thing.
You mean the one where:
An unarmed protestor was shot to death?
Antifa and BLM violence attacking police?
The coup by Democrats was completed?
Where a few morons were let into the capital building and they took selfies and did a bit of vandalism?
Where Trump denounced the rioters?
Bigfoot was not in Washington DC. Why do you keep bringing up Bigfoot sightings? Do you have a fascination for them???!?
Into the Night
Verified User
Didn't read!
Bulverism fallacy.
If you are so confident why did you bring up fraud? Clearly you are attempting to make excuses before the election.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
You act as if this is somehow news to me... I'm already well aware that you didn't read what he said. (CAN you even read??)Didn't read!
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
Have you ever attempted to become literate in English?
Run on sentence.
** Usage of a comma instead of a period.
** The 'h' in 'have' should be capitalized for a new sentence.
Continued illiteracy (another run on sentence plus an unnecessary comma towards the end).
There is no such thing as a "MAGA militia". What/where is this "MAGA militia" of which you speak?
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
Yup. That article gets it correct. That author understands what is happening right now and understands who Mitch McConnell is and how he operates.
Arizona is a very winnable race for Republicans, and Blake Masters is a good candidate. However, Blake Masters is not an "RNC club approved" candidate, therefore Turtle is doing everything under his power to assist Mark Kelly (who is a DNC club approved candidate).
In the end, for Turtle, it doesn't matter whether the candidate is RNC club approved or DNC club approved. All that matters is that the candidate is not MAGA approved. IOW, so long as the candidate will defend the interests of Wall Street rather than fight for the interests of Main Street.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
I am.
Because idk whether or not a valid election will be held (I can't predict the future). My projections in the OP are assuming that a valid election is held.
There are a few particular races this midterm cycle that, atm anyway, are widely apparent "on the ground" that particular candidates are going to win those races. I noted those races in my OP. If those races end up differently than expected, then I would be very curious to find out why that was. It could be totally legitimate, but it could also be fraudulent. We'll see.
Nope. The Demonkkkrat election fraud was so rampant in 2020 that the disclaimer "assuming a valid election is held" is now necessary whenever making any predictions about a future event that is being billed as an election.
If my predictions are wrong, then they are wrong. I don't know what the future holds. We'll see.
What evidence do you have of rampant election fraud in 2020? Why haven't you presented it to a court? Is that evidence on Mike Lindell's phone?
Into the Night
Verified User
RQAA. Stop asking this question mindlessly over and over. It's already been answered. I have already presented you with quite a bit of evidence of election fraud. So have others. Argument of the Stone fallacy. You can't make the evidence disappear by mindlessly asking the same question over and over. You can't make people's judgement of that evidence change that way either.
Last edited:
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
It's already been presented to you countless times by numerous people on this forum over the last roughly two years now.
Irrelevant. The evidence exists regardless.
I have no idea what is on Mike Lindell's phone (I am not Mike Lindell nor am I the 4th Branch of Government).
The funny thing is, you haven't presented any real evidence. Your made up bullshit is not evidence and every court that has looked at it has said it isn't real.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
You're seriously going to resort to THIS childish of a response??
TOO FUNNY!!!!!You can't make it go away by pretending that it doesn't exist. Apparently you thought that your mother was being rational when she told you that there were no monsters under your bed...
Courts haven't looked at it. This is also irrelevant to the existence of the evidence. It exists whether or not a court has looked at it.
You're seriously going to resort to THIS childish of a response??
You can't make it go away by pretending that it doesn't exist. Apparently you thought that your mother was being rational when she told you that there were no monsters under your bed...
Courts haven't looked at it. This is also irrelevant to the existence of the evidence. It exists whether or not a court has looked at it.
You seriously not going to provide any evidence of the massive fraud you claimed occurred? Oh.. that's right. .you can't provide any such evidence so you will make idiotic claims about how you already presented it even though it doesn't exist.
So, I wonder why you have kept this evidence from the courts. Oh.. that's right.. it isn't really evidence. The dog ate your homework. But you did do it. Honest. You wouldn't lie about that.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
It is evidence whether or not a court has looked at it, dumbass.
So, I wonder why you have kept this evidence from the courts. Oh.. that's right.. it isn't really evidence. The dog ate your homework. But you did do it. Honest. You wouldn't lie about that.