You didn't address my question, which I can only assume means you deny that Jesus was a historical person, but you know the overwhelming evidence is against you. In other words, when reality doesn't fit with your ideology, you ignore reality ... that's what every socialist does.
Here is the reality about the Ararat anomaly .... It sits on a moving glacier.
4,500 years .. moving glacier.
Is this your Noah's Ark?
NOTHING conclusive has ever been found to indicate this was the Ark of legend other than the legend itself.
How about this from ChristianAnswers
Over the last two decades the search for Noah's Ark has received international attention. Dozens of expeditions to the Ararat region of eastern Turkey,
mostly by American Christian groups, have led to numerous claims - but no proof.
According to the Bible, Noah's Ark was a large barge constructed of wood and sealed with bitumen. Its overall dimensions were at least 450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet high with three interior decks. A “window” appeared to be constructed around the top (Genesis 6:14-16). Incidentally, the overall size of the Ark makes it the largest seagoing vessel known before the 20th century, and its proportions are amazingly similar to the large ocean liners of today.
The Bible says Noah's boat came to rest on “the mountains of Ararat” (Genesis 8:4). “Ararat” probably designated a region (the ancient kingdom of Urartu) and not a specific mountain peak. After Noah and his family left the Ark on the mountain, the boat virtually disappeared from the pages of the Bible. Later Biblical writers never suggested they knew it could still be seen.
The mountain called Ararat today is more like a mountain range with twin peaks. Interestingly, there have been numerous reports throughout history of a large boat on a mountain in this region. Earliest references (beginning in the 3rd century B.C.) suggested it was common knowledge that the Ark could still be viewed on Mount Ararat.
Reports over the past century range from visits to the vessel, to recovery of wooden timber, to aerial photographs. It is generally believed that at least large part of the Ark is intact, not on the highest peak, but somewhere above the 10,000 foot level. Apparently encased in snow and ice for most of the year, only during certain warm summers can the structure be witnessed or accessed. Some have spoken of climbing onto the roof, others say they have walked inside.
In the 1980s, “ark-eology” was given an air of respectability with the active participation of former NASA astronaut James Irwin in expeditions up the mountain. In addition, Ark investigation was also given a boost with the breakup of the former Soviet Union, because the mountain was right on the Turkey-Soviet border. Expeditions up the mountain had been considered a security threat by the Soviet government.
Unfortunately, return visits to proposed sites have produced no further evidence, the whereabouts of all photographs are presently unknown, and different sightings do not suggest the same location on the mountain. Furthermore, Astronaut James Irwin has since died, a purported eyewitness has recently recanted publicly, and there have been few new expeditions up the mountain in the 1990s. Further expeditions have taken place in the new millennium,
but no proof of the Ark has yet been found.
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-abr/abr-a001.html
CHRISTIAN ANSWERS
As for the historical Jesus, a teacher .. yes, I do believe a historical Jesus did exist .. but the historical one was not the Son of God. A mythical Jesus was designed by christians and Constantine that patterned the myths of ancient religions .. and the life of Hercules .. complete with ressurection.
All christians know of Jesus is from birth to 12 years old and 3 years from 30 to 33?
Many accounts suggest the historical Jesus travelled to the east during those "lost years."
Are you aware of how many Jesus figures there were before Jesus?
Do I believe a historical Jesus existed .. yes.
Do I beleive he was the Son of God .. Hell no.
