signalmankenneth
Verified User
http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/what-incentive-do-insurers-have-cover
Still don't want a Public Option???
Still don't want a Public Option???

http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/what-incentive-do-insurers-have-cover
Still don't want a Public Option???
![]()
No, because even if a "public option" would have covered it, she would have been forced to wait for at least six months for the procedure.
By then, she would have been dead.
And you're basing this on the assumption that socialized medicine would have covered it - a shaky assumption at best. In the UK, they deny procedures all the time. Same shit.
The best approach is to repeal regulations which make it difficult for insurance companies to be competitive.
Also, medicare needs to be restructured and put on the path to privatization. Medicare by itself has at least doubled the cost of healthcare since it was enacted in 1965.
In the UK, only elective procedures are put under significant waiting lists. Some important procedures do have waiting lists, though, not because of too much demand, but because of a lack of radiologists and other such specialists (which is probably because of the fact that doctors aren't paid nearly as much in the UK, but since the public option operates either like a normal insurer or like medicare and doesn't change doctor pay rates the point is moot).
from time to time you need to stop and think about what you post....I suggest you take a moment to reflect on the above and then realize what you just said and why, therefore, we should not have a public option......
to make it easier for you, in essence you've said we need a "public option" that works just like what we already have because places that have the "public option" don't work as well as what we have.....