Limpbaugh wants to own an NFL team :0) - Won't happen

blackascoal said:
And fuck you.

I'm not trying to prove shit to a bunch of fucking morons.

Don't believe Limpy is a racist .. WHO GIVES A FUCK? .. You and your band of morons believing it IS NOT THE POINT.

The point is that the rest of planet earth believes it .. THUS, you ignorant motherfucker .. LIMPY WILL NOT GET AN NFL TEAM.

THAT'S the fucking point moron .. not making you believe shit.

And fuck you.
Click to expand...

He's not a racist. You think lint is racist.
 
rush-rams-drugs.gif
 
How totally predictable....

You can be sure of death, taxes, and the racist accusing everyone else of being racist.....

And I'm beginning to wonder about death and taxes...
 
ESPN:
"Rush Limbaugh's name has been dropped from a group making a bid for the St Louis Rams."
The players got their way, congratulations, well fought.
 
AssHatZombie said:
He's not a racist. You think lint is racist.
Click to expand...

Somehow my brother you're not figuring this out.

It doesn't make a rat's ass bit of difference if you or anyother right-winger figures out if he's a racist or not. SERIOUSLY, your approval isn't required. The case is closed and nobody was fooled but you and a bunch of morons.

Your analogy about lint is quite appropriate because I think you too often demonstrate the intelligence of lint .. yet I don't think you are a racist.

Too often stupid as lint .. absolutely your dumb ass is. .. and I say that with affection .. but a racist .. naw.

Your problem is that you're conditioned and controlled. Not fully in charge of your own mind.

Let me demonstrate how controlled you are brother .. post where Limpy said he didn't say those things. Don't give me bullshit about "why should he"

He doesn't deny them because he said them .. and on his show he spoke about only one of the racist comments the world knows he said by saying "We searched our database, but we can't find it." Never denied saying it.

Search your database and post where Limpy has denied he's a racist.

You're a good guy at heart my brother .. but you don't even control your own mind.

Let your heart into your mind .. kick the demons out.
 
blackascoal said:
SEE: NFL Commissioner says NO to Limpy.

If you morons are still waiting to be convinced that Limpy is a racist .. don't worry about it.

The point has already been made.

:0)

Oh yeah .. and fuck you.

:lmao:
Click to expand...
Frog doing happy dance!!!!!
 
Damocles said:
Again, I assign no motive at all because the motive in inconsequential to my position, just as it was in my analogy.

It doesn't matter why the child is screaming the f-bomb, it only matters that she is and that she will be in trouble, even if you work to defend her saying she was "mocking" the other child. I don't care why she was doing it, she'll still be in trouble.

I'll patiently explain it to you as much as you need in order for you to be intellectually honest about what I said rather than consistently dishonest like this post of yours that I quote here.
Click to expand...

Fuck you~~~ :cof1:

Free went and dug this up and you didn't respond, so I'll just copy it here for you! Note your assigned motive from the get go~


Free's post to you:

Damocles said:
I never assigned a motive. That is sheer projection and wishful arguing.
Click to expand...

I haven't listened to Rush, for more then 15 or 16 years; but Damo, you did make the following post:

Damocles said:
Please, the only reason he thought that the song would be "okay" is because "they did it too!"....
Click to expand...

I put the specific "assignment" in bold.

Now, back to our regular programing.
 
Ice Dancer said:
Fuck you~~~ :cof1:

Free went and dug this up and you didn't respond, so I'll just copy it here for you! Note your assigned motive from the get go~


Free's post to you:



I haven't listened to Rush, for more then 15 or 16 years; but Damo, you did make the following post:



I put the specific "assignment" in bold.

Now, back to our regular programing.
Click to expand...
You can keep offering because it is somewhat flattering, but alas I am married.

And again, this is what messageboards are about. So I can repeat to those people who wish to maintain their deliberate ignorance the same thing in different words again and again until they tire or they say, "OH, that's what you meant..."

I have maintained the same position throughout, starting with foundation blocks (an assertion) then adding to it to make the edifice of a full argument. That you refuse to look at the building because you want to continue to believe that all that can be is the foundation doesn't change that the building stands, and it was consistent, even if you offer to have more sex with me after quoting a post out of context.

I view a conversation like this as an engineer (I view everything that way, it is what I am), I start with a foundation then build further, if necessary either because of questions or because of deliberate distortions, until I have the edifice standing showing my full position.

You may refuse to look at the north face of the building, but I will keep showing you pictures of it. You may pretend that a building isn't there, but others can see it regardless. At some point arguing whether the building is there becomes a waste of time, but messageboards are largely an insanely addictive waste of time, and so I plod on.

My point in that post was that "They do it too" is the same as saying "parody." It did not assign a motive to the song, it solely pointed out that the excuse "parody" was as childlike as the "they do it too" argument and was not good enough in this case.

My first post about it acknowledged both that the article was the basis for the song, and that the phrase was first written by a black liberal article writer neither of which changes my basic point. I will again refer you to the fitting analogy that every parent understands clearly (even you do, and you know you do it is just stubbornness that compels you on now). If I find my daughter shouting the f-bomb in the street, she's going to be in trouble. It won't matter if she tells me, and you back her up, that she was just making fun of somebody else who said the word to her earlier. It won't matter if she intended it as an insult or not. This is the same type of scenario.
 
Damocles said:
You can keep offering because it is somewhat flattering, but alas I am married.

And again, this is what messageboards are about. So I can repeat to those people who wish to maintain their deliberate ignorance the same thing in different words again and again until they tire or they say, "OH, that's what you meant..."

I have maintained the same position throughout, starting with foundation blocks (an assertion) then adding to it to make the edifice of a full argument. That you refuse to look at the building because you want to continue to believe that all that can be is the foundation doesn't change that the building stands, and it was consistent, even if you offer to have more sex with me after quoting a post out of context.

I view a conversation like this as an engineer (I view everything that way, it is what I am), I start with a foundation then build further, if necessary either because of questions or because of deliberate distortions, until I have the edifice standing showing my full position.

You may refuse to look at the north face of the building, but I will keep showing you pictures of it. You may pretend that a building isn't there, but others can see it regardless. At some point arguing whether the building is there becomes a waste of time, but messageboards are largely an insanely addictive waste of time, and so I plod on.

My point in that post was that "They do it too" is the same as saying "parody." It did not assign a motive to the song, it solely pointed out that the excuse "parody" was as childlike as the "they do it too" argument and was not good enough in this case.

My first post about it acknowledged both that the article was the basis for the song, and that the phrase was first written by a black liberal article writer neither of which changes my basic point. I will again refer you to the fitting analogy that every parent understands clearly (even you do, and you know you do it is just stubbornness that compels you on now). If I find my daughter shouting the f-bomb in the street, she's going to be in trouble. It won't matter if she tells me, and you back her up, that she was just making fun of somebody else who said the word to her earlier. It won't matter if she intended it as an insult or not. This is the same type of scenario.
Click to expand...

Here's the fact Damo, I doubt there's a woman on here who'd fuck you with fat zaps dick...well maybe darla would...so don't get too flattered.

You did assign your stupid motive of "he did it too". Continue to deny it, but as Free pointed out, that is what you did~~~spin away dude.
 
Damocles said:
You can keep offering because it is somewhat flattering, but alas I am married.

And again, this is what messageboards are about. So I can repeat to those people who wish to maintain their deliberate ignorance the same thing in different words again and again until they tire or they say, "OH, that's what you meant..."

I have maintained the same position throughout, starting with foundation blocks (an assertion) then adding to it to make the edifice of a full argument. That you refuse to look at the building because you want to continue to believe that all that can be is the foundation doesn't change that the building stands, and it was consistent, even if you offer to have more sex with me after quoting a post out of context.

I view a conversation like this as an engineer (I view everything that way, it is what I am), I start with a foundation then build further, if necessary either because of questions or because of deliberate distortions, until I have the edifice standing showing my full position.

You may refuse to look at the north face of the building, but I will keep showing you pictures of it. You may pretend that a building isn't there, but others can see it regardless. At some point arguing whether the building is there becomes a waste of time, but messageboards are largely an insanely addictive waste of time, and so I plod on.

My point in that post was that "They do it too" is the same as saying "parody." It did not assign a motive to the song, it solely pointed out that the excuse "parody" was as childlike as the "they do it too" argument and was not good enough in this case.

My first post about it acknowledged both that the article was the basis for the song, and that the phrase was first written by a black liberal article writer neither of which changes my basic point. I will again refer you to the fitting analogy that every parent understands clearly (even you do, and you know you do it is just stubbornness that compels you on now). If I find my daughter shouting the f-bomb in the street, she's going to be in trouble. It won't matter if she tells me, and you back her up, that she was just making fun of somebody else who said the word to her earlier. It won't matter if she intended it as an insult or not. This is the same type of scenario.
Click to expand...

Your foundation has major flaws. Did you even survey the site and check for proper drainage? Looks like not. *shrug*
 
Ice Dancer said:
Here's the fact Damo, I doubt there's a woman on here who'd fuck you with fat zaps dick...well maybe darla would...so don't get too flattered.

You did assign your stupid motive of "he did it too". Continue to deny it, but as Free pointed out, that is what you did~~~spin away dude.
Click to expand...
Then why did you keep offering? Now I'm sad.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top