Is America a Christian nation?

Well, that's the "hell" of living in a free society...you have freedom of and freedom from religion (or so the urban legend goes). The problem REALLY started when Eisenhower gave Billy Graham public creds in the anti-communism crusade. Since then, the little cusses have loopholed their way into serious social politics. (i.e. the Moral Majority, creeps like Falwell, etc.) It's a never ending battle, but once you try to lower the iron heel of gov't and ban religious worship you give the hucksters the ammo they need to galvanize their suckers, err followers to do some really nasty things. I say, everyone become a buddhist and just chill out. ;)

No it's a simple fix! Churches start preaching Democratic or Republican politics in the church!bye bye tax exemption!
 
Because that is irrelevant...America is a post Christian nation now....and Old America has been murdered....the Constitution is dead.

The Constitution makes it illegal from day one for the Country to be a "Christian Nation" even if the founders were all Christians
 
Because that is irrelevant...America is a post Christian nation now....and Old America has been murdered....the Constitution is dead.

If the Constitution were truly and mercifully dead, conservatives like yourself wouldn't be so absurdly over-represented in our government.
The great cultural centers of the nation would run most things, and we'd be a far more modern and civilized nation.

You revel in the failures of the earlier versions of ourselves, and it's probably or at least possibly based on various genres of bigotry with which you're afflicted.
I don't pretend to know for sure, but that's my take, anyway, and I feel confident that it's an informed guess.
 
If the Constitution were truly and mercifully dead, conservatives like yourself wouldn't be so absurdly over-represented in our government.
The great cultural centers of the nation would run most things, and we'd be a far more modern and civilized nation.

You revel in the failures of the earlier versions of ourselves, and it's probably or at least possibly based on various genres of bigotry with which you're afflicted.
I don't pretend to know for sure, but that's my take, anyway, and I feel confident that it's an informed guess.

I am a Progressive (non-Utopian).
 
I am a Progressive (non-Utopian).

There is reason for striving for unattainable utopia, and it was best explained, of all sources, by a mere football coach.

Vince Lombardy explained to us that there was only ONE way to achieve excellence,
and that way was to relentlessly, almost maniacally, strive for unattainable perfection.

Excellence, unlike perfection, is attainable, but only once we accept this premise.
I'm no huge fan of Middle America, for the most part, but it worked for Lombardi's Packers--
maybe because he was a smart, New York Italian gentleman.
 
There is reason for striving for unattainable utopia, and it was best explained, of all sources, by a mere football coach.

Vince Lombardy explained to us that there was only ONE way to achieve excellence,
and that way was to relentlessly, almost maniacally, strive for unattainable perfection.

Excellence, unlike perfection, is attainable, but only once we accept this premise.
I'm no huge fan of Middle America, for the most part, but it worked for Lombardi's Packers--
maybe because he was a smart, New York Italian gentleman.

WOKE Utopians not only believe that Utopia can be arrived at, but they also demand that humans be remade to be suitable for Utopia, by force.
 
WOKE Utopians not only believe that Utopia can be arrived at, but they also demand that humans be remade to be suitable for Utopia, by force.

I'm progressive, liberal, but not remotely woke. I don't believe in prioritizing ceilings, but rather believe that we should have the floors in very good position first, both economically and architecturally speaking.
 
I'm progressive, liberal, but not remotely woke. I don't believe in prioritizing ceilings, but rather believe that we should have the floors in very good position first, both economically and architecturally speaking.

What size are your pants ?


Haw, haw.............................haw.


NiftyNiblick

"The towelhead savage even makes animal sounds. Fuck her/him/it with a rusty fishing knife. Useless piece of shit."

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ank-to-Ukrainian-forces&p=5450828#post5450828 #33
 
Oh man,........That means a whole lot of Democrats need to be removed from office to satisfy you then. devout Catholics Joe Biden And Nancy Pelosi just to name a couple.

Not at all.

It's perfectly fine to have a strong set of religious beliefs.

It's absolutely not fine to try to govern others from those reliefs...
 
I'm progressive, liberal, but not remotely woke. I don't believe in prioritizing ceilings, but rather believe that we should have the floors in very good position first, both economically and architecturally speaking.

The test is where you fall on the spectrum of individual freedom and the need to convince people and authoritarian dictates to the serfs enforced by punishment.

As any real liberal would know.
 
The test is where you fall on the spectrum of individual freedom and the need to convince people and authoritarian dictates to the serfs enforced by punishment.

As any real liberal would know.

Conservatives believe in freedom from social responsibility.
That is not a principle with which iIagree.
Our fate was to be born into a social species, not a solitary one, and being the grump recluse that I am, I have to accept that anyway.
 
Conservatives believe in freedom from social responsibility.
That is not a principle with which iIagree.
Our fate was to be born into a social species, not a solitary one, and being the grump recluse that I am, I have to accept that anyway.

If you are not for free minds/free speech then you are anti-western and pro tyranny.
 
If you are not for free minds/free speech then you are anti-western and pro tyranny.

Free minds and free speech are fine, but they don't absolve people of their social responsibilities.
If one is determined to be an obstacle to domestic order in any truly destructive way,
one must either look for any remaining wilderness in which to live, an admittedly difficult task in an overpopulated world,
or one must be excised like a malignant tumor., but as humanely as possible.
That's how our species has evolved, and those in conflict with the results of evolution are also in conflict with those who are not--but as a minority, like Libertarians.
 
Conservatives believe in freedom from social responsibility.
That is not a principle with which iIagree.
Our fate was to be born into a social species, not a solitary one, and being the grump recluse that I am, I have to accept that anyway.

A fat recluse that fancies himself as a knife man, eh.

NiftyNiblick

"The towelhead savage even makes animal sounds. Fuck her/him/it with a rusty fishing knife. Useless piece of shit."

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ank-to-Ukrainian-forces&p=5450828#post5450828 #33
 
Free minds and free speech are fine, but they don't absolve people of their social responsibilities.
If one is determined to be an obstacle to domestic order in any truly destructive way,
one must either look for any remaining wilderness in which to live, an admittedly difficult task in an overpopulated world,
or one must be excised like a malignant tumor., but as humanely as possible.
That's how our species has evolved, and those in conflict with the results of evolution are also in conflict with those who are not--but as a minority, like Libertarians.

Free Minds/Free Speech by definition means that you are not allowed to hurt the people who disagree with you in order to get your way. That is tyranny. What you are talking about is the WOKE program to rub out all dissidents.
 
Back
Top