Conservatives want to raise taxes and kill SS and Medicare

[LV426]

You are not arguing. You make fallacy after fallacy. You are currently locked into multiple paradoxes that you so far haven't cleared. You are being irrational.

You say things like this but you don't believe it yourself...you're just saying it to excuse yourself for having nothing meaningful to contribute.

 

[LV426]

TANSTAAFL. Nothing is free, dumbass. ACA is already failing. It is already the most expensive insurance and is failing from its own weight. Socialism doesn't work.

Nothing is free except oil company profits and tax cuts for the rich.

 

[archives]

You are not arguing. You make fallacy after fallacy. You are currently locked into multiple paradoxes that you so far haven't cleared. You are being irrational.

When "pidgin" is done, the fallacy bullshit comes out, predictable, and he never fails at fulfilling the prediction

 

[LV426]

ACA is already failing.

2012 called, they want their bullshit back.

It is already the most expensive insurance and is failing from its own weight.

It is not the most expensive insurance, and is in fact quite affordable. Which is why about 25M people got that insurance.

I bet you don't have health insurance, and it's because you can't afford it.

 

[Althea]

Because everything Conservatism touches dies, the GOP majority in the House now wants to establish a 30% national sales tax.

Every single Conservative wants to raise your taxes and take away your entitlements.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1616118423704010752

Ouch. That's gonna kill the automobile industry.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

There is no such thing as a 'social safety net'. Socialism doesn't work.
Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security are already beginning to fail.

Only to the extent that humanity itself is failing.

Conservative Libertarianism would be humanity's final configuration before extinction.
Those who cannot abide civilization must be either coerced or purged for even the short term survival of the species.

 

[archives]

TANSTAAFL. Nothing is free, dumbass. ACA is already failing. It is already the most expensive insurance and is failing from its own weight. Socialism doesn't work.

If "socialism doesn't work" why is it then a part of every economy of every nation in the world? And why did America dating back to the 19th Century, if not earlier, included in its economy?

 

[LV426]

When "pidgin" is done, the fallacy bullshit comes out, predictable, and he never fails at fulfilling the prediction

"Fallacy" = an excuse

Just hit them on that over and over, they will eventually give up and leave.

Seriously, just call it out...there's nothing they can say to it because they know it's true.

 

[Into the Night]

No, it's YOUR paradox pal, because I don't believe that you can get lower oil prices by unrestrained oil company profits.

YOU THINK THAT.

It's what you've been arguing this entire time.

The price of oil will never go down and stay down so long as oil companies can make any amount of profit they want.

Inversion fallacy. You are still locked in paradox. You cannot clear your paradox by LIF. You are still being irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.

 

[Althea]

An incredibly regressive tax proposal that would place a huge burden on lower income people, and massively reduce taxes on the rich. So of course the GOP would propose it.

Yes. Corporations would love to be rid of the 8.5% FICA matching contribution for employees.

 

[Into the Night]

If I wasn't pointing anything out, you wouldn't be coming up with excuses.

All you do here is make excuses.

You aren't pointing anything out. You are making fallacies instead.

 

[Into the Night]

A bailout.

After you said there wasn't one.

LOL.

I never said there wasn't. Word stuffing.
You are describing socialism, not capitalism. Redefinition fallacy.

 

[LV426]

Inversion fallacy. You are still locked in paradox. You cannot clear your paradox by LIF. You are still being irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.

Your paradox is that you expect lower oil prices to accompany constrained supply, but the economics of that makes no sense.

Since pointing that out, you've retreated to the same excuses you always retreat to whenever your dissonance is called out.

 

[Into the Night]

Your paradox is that you expect lower oil prices to accompany constrained supply, but the economics of that make no sense.

Since pointing that out, you've retreated to the same excuses you always retreat to whenever your dissonance is called out.

YOUR paradox. You are still locked in it. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.

 

[LV426]

You aren't pointing anything out. You are making fallacies instead.

Another excuse!

You have so many excuses and so few answers.

 

[Into the Night]

That's what ITN does...they steal what you write and try to claim it as their own.

The reason they do this is because they don't believe in anything enough to come up with things to say on JPP.

So instead, you get excuses and plagairism.

You are describing yourself again.

 

[LV426]

I never said there wasn't.

You literally said "there was no bailout".

 

[LV426]

You are describing socialism, not capitalism.

Right, socialism bailed out the economy with PPP.

Just like I said.

 

[Into the Night]

As I said, and you didn't address in your attempted deflection, t it isn't all wrong, entitlements is on the list of freedom caucus list, and the budget wonks on the right back to Ryan are big on replacing SS with funding private accounts

SS is already beginning to fail. Government funding of private accounts is also socialism.

 

[LV426]

YOUR paradox. You are still locked in it. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.

I'm not the one here who thinks the price of oil will go down if we wish it hard enough.