6 month wait to qualify. Sweet deal Dems

all of this shit, and the libs are just DYING to hand more money to the insurance companies while complaining about reaped profits. good god are they ever dumb.
 
tinfoil said:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/05/democrats-plan-help-uninsurables-questioned/

LOL

What a racket
Click to expand...


This is fucking classic. First of all, under present law there is no waiting period at all. Which is pretty sweet, except there is no high risk pool so you're just plain fucked. For good. And I'd note that in the House bill that the Democrats put together there is no waiting period whatsoever.

Second, the high risk pool is a temporary measure until the complete ban on insurers denying coverage based on a pre-existing conditions goes into effect. The Republicans on the other hand have no ban on denying people insurance based on pre-existing conditions and instead want a permanent high risk pool.
 
TurdFerguson said:
This is fucking classic. First of all, under present law there is no waiting period at all. Which is pretty sweet, except there is no high risk pool so you're just plain fucked. For good. And I'd note that in the House bill that the Democrats put together there is no waiting period whatsoever.

Second, the high risk pool is a temporary measure until the complete ban on insurers denying coverage based on a pre-existing conditions goes into effect. The Republicans on the other hand have no ban on denying people insurance based on pre-existing conditions and instead want a permanent high risk pool.
Click to expand...

Prove it. let's see where you pulled that shit from
 
tinfoil said:
This , you idiot


And I'd note that in the House bill that the Democrats put together there is no waiting period whatsoever.
Click to expand...


Did you read the article that you linked to, hot shot? It's right in there:

But the House health care bill unveiled last week by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., doesn't include a waiting period. Instead, it would require insurance plans who "dump" seriously ill patients to repay the federal pool. "The House provision will provide immediate relief for people with high-risk conditions who have no alternative for coverage," said Finan.
Click to expand...


Jackass.
 
tinfoil said:
Prove it. let's see where you pulled that shit from
Click to expand...

"But the House health care bill unveiled last week by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., doesn't include a waiting period. Instead, it would require insurance plans who "dump" seriously ill patients to repay the federal pool. "The House provision will provide immediate relief for people with high-risk conditions who have no alternative for coverage," said Finan."

That would be from your article...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/05/democrats-plan-help-uninsurables-questioned/
 
Superfreak said:
"But the House health care bill unveiled last week by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., doesn't include a waiting period. Instead, it would require insurance plans who "dump" seriously ill patients to repay the federal pool. "The House provision will provide immediate relief for people with high-risk conditions who have no alternative for coverage," said Finan."

That would be from your article...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/05/democrats-plan-help-uninsurables-questioned/
Click to expand...

Duhhh. Is it not clear that I do not believe Nancy when she says that?
 
tinfoil said:
Duhhh. Is it not clear that I do not believe Nancy when she says that?
Click to expand...

Um... the bill does not have it. Period. Just admit you are embarrassed that he used your own article against you.


What I would like to know is why are they waiting until 2013 to implement the rule that insurance companies cannot deny coverage? hmm... why could that be? anything to do with 2012 perhaps?
 
Superfreak said:
Um... the bill does not have it. Period. Just admit you are embarrassed that he used your own article against you.


What I would like to know is why are they waiting until 2013 to implement the rule that insurance companies cannot deny coverage? hmm... why could that be? anything to do with 2012 perhaps?
Click to expand...


You think that they Democrats gain something by putting it off until after 2012? What would they gain?

The one thing that (I thought) pretty much everyone agreed with is that denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions was basically fucked up and should be stopped. It seems to me that the sooner they implement the ban the better off they would be.
 
TurdFerguson said:
You think that they Democrats gain something by putting it off until after 2012? What would they gain?

The one thing that (I thought) pretty much everyone agreed with is that denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions was basically fucked up and should be stopped. It seems to me that the sooner they implement the ban the better off they would be.
Click to expand...

You can't tell a for profit company to take pre existing conditions and turn around and say you can't raise your premium to cover it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top