I've come to the conclusion that he is an elaborate troll. He truly is a troll, a long winded, well written troll. Who other than a troll can continually argue his points and spin when being proven wrong so often? It becomes inconceivable that an honest personality can be as well informed on things, and yet draw the exactly wrong conclusion every time. I find it hard to believe that he really thinks that you couldn't divide a ruler or a mile into three equal parts. But there he is, defending it to the teeth.
I find it hard to believe that anyone really, really would think that mass hysteria is "scientific evidence" that the object of such hysteria is real.
Anyone who claims that Iraq is a huge success.... Anyone who votes for someone they hate, and anyone who thinks that Pat Buchanan is a leftist?....
And on and on and on....
He has to be a troll. He can't really believe the lame crap he spews. Unless he's posting from a padded room.