meme
New member
By CONN CARROLL, For The Bulletin
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Last month, when the White House released its visitor log for the first six months of the Obama presidency, one name appeared far more often than any other: Service Employee International Union (SEIU) President Andrew Stern. Stern has every right to expect to be welcome in the Obama White House.
He has repeatedly bragged about the fact that under his leadership, the SEIU spent $60.7 million to elect Barack Obama president. And what is Stern buying with his $60.7 million besides White House tours? Ever expanding federal government programs and state government bailouts, which are rapidly bankrupting our country.
Unlike his predecessor, John Sweeney, who came up the ranks after starting with the International Ladies Garment Workers Union, Stern entered the labor movement when the SEIU organized his shop when he was working as a welfare case worker for the State of Pennsylvania. Mr. Stern’s public sector entrance into labor is by no means an anomaly.
In fact, for the first time ever in American history, preliminary estimates of union membership for this year show that most union members now work for either the local, state, or federal government.
Heritage scholar James Sherk has the numbers: “The overall unionization rate between January and September stood at 12.4 percent, unchanged from last year. However, this difference masks a large difference between unions in the private and public sectors. Union membership has fallen to 7.3 percent of private sector workers – the lowest rate since Roosevelt signed the National Labor Relations Act into law. But it is a completely different story in the public sector: 37.6 percent of government employees belong to unions, up almost a percentage point since last year. Those 7.9 million unionized government employees are 51 percent of all union members nationwide.”
The days when “union member” meant an American working in a steel plant, or coal mine or auto factory are gone.
Today, unions are dependent on government, not the private sector, for their livelihood. Therefore, unions like the SEIU have little interest in private sector job growth. Private sector jobs don’t help fund $60.7 million political campaigns. But government jobs do. The change in incentives has been devastating to American taxpayers. Manhattan Institute senior fellow Steven Malanga explains why:
“In the private sector … employers who are too generous with pay and benefits will be punished. In the public sector, however, more union members means more voters. And more voters means more dollars for political campaigns to elect sympathetic politicians who will enact higher taxes to foot the bill for the upward arc of government spending on workers.”
Heritage’s Mr. Sherk details just some of the ways we have already witnessed this:
“In Oregon, the labor movement is donating hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund two ballot initiatives to raise personal income and business taxes. The unions want tax hikes instead of cuts in the gold-plated medical benefits for state workers. In California, the SEIU spent $1 million on a television ad campaign pressing for higher oil, gas, and liquor taxes instead of spending reductions. However, in Washington, state Democrats have so far resisted the labor movement’s call for higher taxes. In response labor unions are threatening to fund primary campaigns against the Democrats who oppose the tax hikes.”
The United Auto Workers already made General Motors and Chrysler so uncompetitive they had to be bailed out by President Obama. But who will Obama turn to when Mr. Stern’s SEIU has bankrupted us?
Conn Carroll is an assistant director of strategic communications at The Heritage Foundation.
http://www.thebulletin.us/articles/2009/11/17/commentary/op-eds/doc4b025de53d9a3423530423.txt
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Last month, when the White House released its visitor log for the first six months of the Obama presidency, one name appeared far more often than any other: Service Employee International Union (SEIU) President Andrew Stern. Stern has every right to expect to be welcome in the Obama White House.
He has repeatedly bragged about the fact that under his leadership, the SEIU spent $60.7 million to elect Barack Obama president. And what is Stern buying with his $60.7 million besides White House tours? Ever expanding federal government programs and state government bailouts, which are rapidly bankrupting our country.
Unlike his predecessor, John Sweeney, who came up the ranks after starting with the International Ladies Garment Workers Union, Stern entered the labor movement when the SEIU organized his shop when he was working as a welfare case worker for the State of Pennsylvania. Mr. Stern’s public sector entrance into labor is by no means an anomaly.
In fact, for the first time ever in American history, preliminary estimates of union membership for this year show that most union members now work for either the local, state, or federal government.
Heritage scholar James Sherk has the numbers: “The overall unionization rate between January and September stood at 12.4 percent, unchanged from last year. However, this difference masks a large difference between unions in the private and public sectors. Union membership has fallen to 7.3 percent of private sector workers – the lowest rate since Roosevelt signed the National Labor Relations Act into law. But it is a completely different story in the public sector: 37.6 percent of government employees belong to unions, up almost a percentage point since last year. Those 7.9 million unionized government employees are 51 percent of all union members nationwide.”
The days when “union member” meant an American working in a steel plant, or coal mine or auto factory are gone.
Today, unions are dependent on government, not the private sector, for their livelihood. Therefore, unions like the SEIU have little interest in private sector job growth. Private sector jobs don’t help fund $60.7 million political campaigns. But government jobs do. The change in incentives has been devastating to American taxpayers. Manhattan Institute senior fellow Steven Malanga explains why:
“In the private sector … employers who are too generous with pay and benefits will be punished. In the public sector, however, more union members means more voters. And more voters means more dollars for political campaigns to elect sympathetic politicians who will enact higher taxes to foot the bill for the upward arc of government spending on workers.”
Heritage’s Mr. Sherk details just some of the ways we have already witnessed this:
“In Oregon, the labor movement is donating hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund two ballot initiatives to raise personal income and business taxes. The unions want tax hikes instead of cuts in the gold-plated medical benefits for state workers. In California, the SEIU spent $1 million on a television ad campaign pressing for higher oil, gas, and liquor taxes instead of spending reductions. However, in Washington, state Democrats have so far resisted the labor movement’s call for higher taxes. In response labor unions are threatening to fund primary campaigns against the Democrats who oppose the tax hikes.”
The United Auto Workers already made General Motors and Chrysler so uncompetitive they had to be bailed out by President Obama. But who will Obama turn to when Mr. Stern’s SEIU has bankrupted us?
Conn Carroll is an assistant director of strategic communications at The Heritage Foundation.
http://www.thebulletin.us/articles/2009/11/17/commentary/op-eds/doc4b025de53d9a3423530423.txt
