Trump-Stormy Daniels settlement at heart of potential NY DA indictment didn't violate

ExpressLane said:
The law on how Mail outballots would be distributed and how long they would be accepted and counted. If hey makes them out to everyone on the voter rolls even if people had moved and they counted in them for several days after the election was over
Click to expand...

next he'll ask you for the statute #......then he will ignore you and make you jump some other hoop......
 
bill-clinton-paula-jones-paid.jpg
 
ExpressLane said:
The law on how Mail outballots would be distributed and how long they would be accepted and counted. If hey makes them out to everyone on the voter rolls even if people had moved and they counted in them for several days after the election was over
Click to expand...

Cite the law, how was it changed? Was it an interpretation or a change in wording?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I am sorry you have no clue what is going on here.......but I don't give a fuck what you pretend is happening.....

there was a negotiated agreement. Cohen paid the consideration and billed it to Trump as client costs. Trump paid the bill. When I invoice clients for fees and costs I pay taxes on the fees. Why would I pay taxes on the costs? They are not my income. It is also not a contribution. The client is paying me back......
Click to expand...

As a stupid lawyer i will explain to you what Lawyers and those running in campaigns can and cannot do as you are painfully stupid.

It DOES NOT matter if Cohen pays and bills Trump client costs, as that in NO WAY excludes Trump having to declare it is a campaign contribution, in the midst of an declared campaign. Find a lawyer you know who avoids you due to your stupidity and ask him what a 'undisclosed contribution ' to a campaign is.

Cohen has detailed it and the National Enquirer head 'Pecker' is a fully cooperating witness on the catch and kill, who was one of Trumps closest friends at the time, always on each others jets and had a history of doing 'catch and kill' , has admitted it they discussed it, it is a slam dunk conviction. You can impune Cohen, but not the documented facts and not Pecker.


you need to stop talking in areas you know little to nothing, like the law.
 
QP! said:
As a stupid lawyer i will explain to you what Lawyers and those running in campaigns can and cannot do as you are painfully stupid.

It DOES NOT matter if Cohen pays and bills Trump client costs, as that in NO WAY excludes Trump having to declare it is a campaign contribution, in the midst of an declared campaign. Find a lawyer you know who avoids you due to your stupidity and ask him what a 'undisclosed contribution ' to a campaign is.
Click to expand...

how the fuck is Trump's money, Cohen's campaign contribution?.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
you'll have to tell QP......HE'S the one who thinks it was a payment of a retainer fee, lol.......

the invoice said it was for fees and costs........the money paid as consideration for the NDA was obviously costs not fees.....
Click to expand...
Take it up with the court and the DoJ.

the monthly invoices COHEN submitted were not in connection with any legal services he had provided in 2017.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
sorry, I don't accept legal advice from a Dollar General cashier......
Click to expand...

Says the guy who says he is a lawyer and then watches the Tucker Carlson video and comes in here proclaiming it exculpatory with regards to the Shaman and others charged.


FLOL at being duped by Tucker, as you were, when Tucker is mocking you guys at how he has to lie to you, as you are so stupid and demand lies.

Imagine being that lawyer and boasting you are a lawyer.


PostmodernProphet - "Your honor, I would like to provide the following evidence my clients being charged with robbing the bank are not guilty. I just secured video footage from Tucker showing them at coffee shop earlier that day, NOT robbing any bank'.

Judge - 'Ummmm. what about all the video footage showing them on the scene and participating in the crimes being done. That is not exlcuded because you have footage when they are not doing it'.


PsotmodernProphet - 'herr derr, ...'
 
PostmodernProphet said:
how the fuck is Trump's money, Cohen's campaign contribution?.......
Click to expand...

OMG. Imagine the above question asked by a guy claiming to be lawyer. How stupid is this guy.

As a lawyer you should be able to read this but i suggest you get someone else to read it to you and explain it to you.


Understand that Trump is the 'unindicted co conspirator' in that conviction ABOUT to get indicted for the Campaign Contribution violation for using Cohen as his proxy.




Michael Cohen Pleads Guilty In Manhattan Federal Court To Eight Counts, Including Criminal Tax Evasion And Campaign Finance Violations


...one count of causing an unlawful campaign contribution
Click to expand...


I honestly have to hope PostmodernProphet is not a practicing lawyer and got a Mc'lawlicense. It is absolutely clear he has no clue about areas such as being co conspirators.

PostmodernProphet - Your honor my client, the politician is innocent of paying the bride. He did not pay it, his lawyer did. Throw this case out.

Judge - Ummmm. If your client gave the lawyer the money to pay the bribe and to hide it as legal fees, he is indeed guilty of that bribe.

PostmodernProphet - 'REALLY???', 'but he never paid, and the lawyer did so how could my clients money be the lawyers bribe money??' herp derp, herp derp.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Take it up with the court and the DoJ.

the monthly invoices COHEN submitted were not in connection with any legal services he had provided in 2017.
Click to expand...

But... but ... PostmodernProphet is a lawyer so he knows the law unlike the DOj and Courts. The Shaman is not guilty of the crimes he was convicted by his brilliant legal analysis of the Tucker video, and Trump cannot be guilty of campaign finance crimes if he paid it thru Cohen disguised a legal billings.

Herp derp, herp derp.
 
ExpressLane said:
Trump-Stormy Daniels settlement at heart of potential NY DA indictment didn't violate campaign law: FEC expert

Prosecutors in the Manhattan district attorney's office won't have much of a legal leg to stand on if they indict former President Donald Trump on violating campaign finance law, according to a legal expert and former member of the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

"If the state charges are based on a supposed violation of federal campaign finance law, then the Manhattan DA is way off base," Hans von SpakovskyManhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office will reportedly meet with law enforcement officials to discuss logistics for some time next week regarding a potential indictment, which stems from a years-long investigation into Trump's alleged hush money scandal involving porn star Stormy Daniels.

In the final weeks of the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump's then-lawyer Michael Cohen sent $130,000 to Daniels to prevent her from disclosing her alleged 2006 affair with Trump, who has denied the affair. Trump subsequently reimbursed Cohen.

It's been widely speculated that Trump could be charged with overseeing the false recording of the reimbursements in his company's internal records as "legal expenses."

Prosecutors are also expected to charge Trump with violating campaign finance laws by arranging the payments to buy Daniels' silence weeks before the 2016 election. However, experts have questioned the legal reasoning behind such a charge.

"A settlement payment of a nuisance claim is not a federal campaign expense," said von Spakovsky, a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation. "The state DA has no authority to prosecute a federal campaign finance violation in any event."

Such cases, he argues, are within the province of the FEC, where he served as a commissioner, or the U.S. Justice Department, explaining that both agencies have known about the facts for years but have chosen not to prosecute Trump.

"So, the federal agencies with jurisdiction did not consider it a violation," said von Spakovsky, who's been following this case for years.

In 2018, von Spakovsky wrote that the payment to Daniels seemed to be a "nuisance settlement," which celebrities often make, especially when faced with the threat of a false or salacious claim.

"Critics of the president claim this not only was a campaign expense that should have been reported but a potentially illegal loan by Cohen. But the settlement was ultimately paid out of Trump's personal funds and had nothing to do with the campaign since their alleged one-night stand occurred 10 years before the campaign," wrote von Spakovsky. "No reasonable member of a jury would consider this to be a campaign-related expense that needed to be reported, or to which any other campaign finance rules in the Federal Election Campaign Act apply."....


"The alleged one-night stand between Daniels and Trump is far more of a stretch," wrote von Spakovsky. "Daniels had no connection to the presidential campaign of any kind and the encounter — if it occurred — didn't happen during the campaign itself. In any event, even if the Daniels payment were to be considered a campaign-related expense, unlike Edwards, the nominal $130,000 payment wasn't made by Trump campaign donors but by Trump's personal attorney (not the campaign's attorney) with whom he has a long-standing business relationship. . . . Even if one might be able to reasonably construe the payment to Daniels as somehow related to the presidential campaign, there still would be no violation since candidates are allowed to spend as much of their own money as they want on their own campaigns."


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tr...ictment-didnt-violate-campaign-law-fec-expert

================================


If this pending arrest is hinged around this hush money payment to Stormy Daniels the case is doomed to failure. A Presidential candidate can do what they want with their own money. This case will not see Trump behind bars or saddled with a felony conviction if it hinges on this payment.
Click to expand...

Fox News do not have legal minds- They have criminal minds.

So, I am calling BULLSHIT!

depositphotos_105038804-stock-illustration-bullshit-meter-on-high.jpg


depositphotos_105038804-stock-illustration-bullshit-meter-on-high.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top