Trump-Stormy Daniels settlement at heart of potential NY DA indictment didn't violate

Trump using his own money is not relevant, using your own money to do anything that benefits your campaign is a campaign contribution and must be reported as such. Mis-reporting is as legal fees is a crime or n NY. If you mis-report is with intent to hide the true purpose of the campaign contribution is a felony.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
And where did they go since then? Thanks for proving my point that (D)s don't tolerate corrupt, immoral cheaters in their ranks, unlike you Reichwingers who worship them. Nice job!
Click to expand...

:rofl2: Biden crime family. Correct me if I'm wrong didn't they reelect Bill Clinton? His affair was widely known in the White House in 1996 and he was reelected in 1997. Plus Clinton was widely known as a philanderer when he was running for president.


My sister in law was a model for the Ducks Unlimited Convention in Arkansas. Clinton propositioned her there and she turned him down . Actually he sent a member of his security detail and she said no then Bill asked her himself to come to his hotel room she still said no. We were watching the news and he was an unknown and my sister in law said that guy hit on me in Arkansas . A few months later other women were claiming Clinton had molested them. Hillary stood by her man though.
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
Trump using his own money is not relevant, using your own money to do anything that benefits your campaign is a campaign contribution and must be reported as such. Mis-reporting is as legal fees is a crime or n NY. If you mis-report is with intent to hide the true purpose of the campaign contribution is a felony.
Click to expand...
If you would have paid the expense anyway it is not counted as a campaign contribution. Trump didn't want Melaniia or his family to know nor damage to the Trump brand name. So he would have paid Stormy off anyway. So it isn't a campaign expense and that is why the FEC did not pursue Trump. The statute of limitations had run in the NY violation so without the FEC thing they have no case. So they have no case.
 
Last edited:
ExpressLane said:
If you would have paid the expense anyway it is not counted as a campaign contribution. Trump didn't want Melaniia or his family to know. So he would have paid Stormy off anyway. So it isn't a campaign expense and that is why the FEC did not pursue Trump. The statute of limitations had run in the NY violation so without the FEC thing they have no case. So they have no case.
Click to expand...
That’s not true, if it benefits the campaign it’s a contribution even if it served two purposes, but the timing here makes it very clear it did not have much to do with his family.

You keep falling for these lies.
 
ExpressLane said:
:rofl2: Biden crime family. Correctly if I'm wrong didn't they reelect Bill Clinton? His affair was widely known in the White House in 1996 and he was reelected in 1997
Click to expand...

It is true that he got re-elected. It is also true that that year I voted for a different candidate because Bill disgusted and disappointed me with his philandering -- in our WH even.

That is what makes me #NeverARepublican -- principles.

Thanks for asking.
 
ExpressLane said:
:rofl2: Biden crime family. Correct me if I'm wrong didn't they reelect Bill Clinton? His affair was widely known in the White House in 1996 and he was reelected in 1997
Click to expand...

Bill Clinton was reelected in November 1996, and his affair with Monica Lewinsky wasn't publically known until 1998.

No one who voted 1996 is in a position to be scolded for voting for Clinton because Monica Lewinsky.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol.....now you are really confused......first you thought Cohen's invoice to Trump was an illegal campaign contribution, then you thought Trump paying him was an illegal campaign contribution......now you think Trump paid him with campaign funds...this is why you shouldn't decide someone is guilty before you get any evidence......
Click to expand...

Ok another lesson about the depths of your stupidity.


Even if a rich person uses their OWN funds in the furtherance of their campaign, those are considered 'Campaign Funds' you imbecile dunce.

Trump giving Cohen the money to silence Stormy, to not interfere with his election is a Campaign Finance violation. I know as a lawyer (if you are one) you have no need to understand all areas of law, but it would benefit you, in life, to speak less and learn more.

Using the personal funds of the candidate
When candidates use their personal funds for campaign purposes, they are making contributions to their campaigns. Candidate contributions to their own campaigns are not subject to any limits. They must, however, be reported.
Click to expand...


Don't you tire of being wrong? ...and stupid???

I cannot believe you did not know that and i await you later pretending you knew it when i bring it up again.

I am embarrassed for you. For your profession. You are out of your league and need to stop embarrassing yourself.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
fees and costs, fuckling......fees and costs.......sorry this is difficult for your feeble mind.........
Click to expand...

Hey stupid.

If all the money is fees and costs, what is the money that Cohen gave to Stormy then?

Stormy says - I am going to publish my story.
Cohen says for Trump - I will pay $130,000 to stay quiet and sign this non disclosure.
Cohen pays Stormy
Trump pays Cohen saying it is for 'fees and costs'.


A stupid lawyer thinks the above makes sense. That Cohen is just getting 'fees and costs and that is legal' but that $130K Trump paid to COhen is just a flow thru to Stormy. it is not suddenly shielded and legit because a lawyer, Cohen, got in between.


You are so painfully stupid that if someone came up to you and said 'I want to bribe a politician but i want to pay it to you as fees and costs, and you give it the politician' that it is suddenly legit. You ACTUALLY believe that, as a lawyer, because you are hopelessly stupid.
 
Cypress said:
Bill Clinton was reelected in November 1996, and his affair with Monica Lewinsky wasn't publically known until 1998.

No one who voted 1996 is in a position to be scolded for voting for Clinton because Monica Lewinsky.
Click to expand...
None of the high moral people in the White House spoke up about Monica even though it was widely known in the White House and Clinton was a known as a philander even though he a Hillary both lied about it on the campaign trail.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
It is true that he got re-elected. It is also true that that year I voted for a different candidate because Bill disgusted and disappointed me with his philandering -- in our WH even.

That is what makes me #NeverARepublican -- principles.

Thanks for asking.
Click to expand...
Did you vote for him the first time?
 
Doc Dutch said:
Are you claiming to be a lawyer, Pmp?

What are you willing to wager on the outcome of Trump's crime in NY?
Click to expand...

there is no fucking chance he is a lawyer. None. Because if he is fuck that profession.

I have used a lot of smart lawyers in my career and seen some really dumb ones. But he would honestly be the Lauren Boebert and Marjorie Greene of his profession.


He has no clue what a campaign contribution is and what the law around them are. That people can fund their own campaigns and that still counts as a campaign contribution.
 
QP! said:
Ok another lesson about the depths of your stupidity.


Even if a rich person uses their OWN funds in the furtherance of their campaign, those are considered 'Campaign Funds' you imbecile dunce.

Trump giving Cohen the money to silence Stormy, to not interfere with his election is a Campaign Finance violation. I know as a lawyer (if you are one) you have no need to understand all areas of law, but it would benefit you, in life, to speak less and learn more.




Don't you tire of being wrong? ...and stupid???

I cannot believe you did not know that and i await you later pretending you knew it when i bring it up again.

I am embarrassed for you. For your profession. You are out of your league and need to stop embarrassing yourself.
Click to expand...

it is sad that you continue to pretend that paying his attorney's bill somehow becomes a contribution to his own campaign......it must be the result of the same extreme case of TDS that Bragg has.....perhaps drinking bleach will help you rid yourself of that disease......
 
ExpressLane said:
None of the high moral people in the White House spoke up about Monica even though it was widely known in the White House and Clinton was a known as a philander even though he a Hillary both lied about it on the campaign trail.
Click to expand...

Now you're trying to change your story.

No rank and file liberal who voted in 1996, and nobody on this board had knowledge of Clinton's affair during the 96 campaign -- and you can't scold them for voting for Clinton because Monica Lewinsky.
 
QP! said:
there is no fucking chance he is a lawyer. None. Because if he is fuck that profession.

I have used a lot of smart lawyers in my career and seen some really dumb ones. But he would honestly be the Lauren Boebert and Marjorie Greene of his profession.


He has no clue what a campaign contribution is and what the law around them are. That people can fund their own campaigns and that still counts as a campaign contribution.
Click to expand...
I have no need for advice from a Dollar General cashier to explain the law to me.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top