Transgender Democrat shoots up Christian school a hate crime.

Parent's tax dollars?

I'm retired military. Although I had to earn it, your parents tax dollars funded both my dad, a two-time Vietnam vet, my childhood schooling in DOD schools and my training in the military when I joined out of HS in 1975.
 
338419753_699448055308471_8132895705254348220_n.jpg
 
Dragonboy, why do you never chastise the assholes on the right who are standing on the bodies of dead American children to attack trannies?

I have that loser on ignore but if the reply was for me (since I got a notification of quote from Yakuda), I'm posting what one of the forum's conservative members said about the Sandy Hook shooting. This poster also said he didn't care how many little kids died from gun violence, and at one point changed his nic to LOL Sandy Hook.

1) Don't do fuck all. 10k-14k deaths a year is a drop in the bucket. It is not significant, or even worthy of a headline. It is absolutely 100% worth 14k people dying each year to preserve the 2nd amendment. As I have already pointed out in other threads, 100,000 people die each year because doctors don't wash their hands. 33k people die each year in car accidents. 14k out of 300 million is simply not a big number... it's not relevant or noteworthy in any way. I don't even recognize gun violence as a substantial problem.... I don't see a problem, it's virtually non-existent.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Evidently YOU don't. But this guy "transgendered" to a woman. I'd say that's a BIG change, n'cest pas?



So you need sarcasm explained to you, obviously, n'cest pas?.

Aww, what's the matter toodles? A little sensitive when someone makes a fool out of you WHEN YOU SAY SOMETHING FUCKING STUPID?

So all the right wing BS you've been shoveling along with nasty, condescending, racist revisionist rhetoric over the years are your attempt at sarcasm?

:rolleyes: Puh-leeze! Only your trollish brethren and the clown you see in the mirror is buying that one!

Here's a thought, don't dish it out if you can't take it. Carry on.
 
Last edited:

Crowder....another well paid MAGA media whore who latches on to an idiot dodge from the FACT that this killer bought 7 weapons at different gun shops BECAUSE HE/SHE WAS UNDER THERAPY....assault weapons used in the attack.

He/she was a former student of the school....thereby a Catholic. IF the manifesto left behind professes hatred for Catholics, then a hate crime can well be listed among other charges.

Pity deluded dummies like Crowder and his audience didn't think that through.
 
I have that loser on ignore but if the reply was for me (since I got a notification of quote from Yakuda), I'm posting what one of the forum's conservative members said about the Sandy Hook shooting. This poster also said he didn't care how many little kids died from gun violence, and at one point changed his nic to LOL Sandy Hook.

1) Don't do fuck all. 10k-14k deaths a year is a drop in the bucket. It is not significant, or even worthy of a headline. It is absolutely 100% worth 14k people dying each year to preserve the 2nd amendment. As I have already pointed out in other threads, 100,000 people die each year because doctors don't wash their hands. 33k people die each year in car accidents. 14k out of 300 million is simply not a big number... it's not relevant or noteworthy in any way. I don't even recognize gun violence as a substantial problem.... I don't see a problem, it's virtually non-existent.

People who are willing to dance on the bodies of children to make political points are not good people, IMHO.
 

It is a Hate Crime, Grok. I'm against the entire idea of "hate crime" since shooting anyone, much less children, is wrong. All to often I think adding "hate crime" is like giving someone the death penalty twice. It looks good, but accomplishes nothing additional.
 
If you took off your MAGA blinders and uncovered your ears, you'd know the answer. But rather than read more of your BS, I'll educate you:

https://www.npr.org/2023/03/29/1166891515/how-the-nashville-shooter-was-able-to-legally-buy-7-guns

https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-will-sign-these-3-executive-orders-curb-gun-violence-1581846


Now, I'm asking all the amateur gun enthusiasts and self alluded "experts" to verify the make and model of the "assault style" rifles used in the Tennessee shooting. This way, we can no for certain if those particular weapons were formerly on the 1994 AWB list. Knowing this gives credibility to Biden's latest statements, and would satisfy anti-gun control groups either way.

If you don't have the intellectual courage/honesty to do so, then don't come here with your usual attempted dodges, bluff and bluster....ya look preposterous even for a Post Modern "Prophet". :D
/shrugs...I have no idea what the answer is, but I know it's not important enough to waste the time looking it up......what's important is to realise it's not illegal now......if you don't like that, change the law........if you can't, shut the fuck up.....
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
If you took off your MAGA blinders and uncovered your ears, you'd know the answer. But rather than read more of your BS, I'll educate you:

https://www.npr.org/2023/03/29/11668...lly-buy-7-guns

https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-w...olence-1581846


Now, I'm asking all the amateur gun enthusiasts and self alluded "experts" to verify the make and model of the "assault style" rifles used in the Tennessee shooting. This way, we can no for certain if those particular weapons were formerly on the 1994 AWB list. Knowing this gives credibility to Biden's latest statements, and would satisfy anti-gun control groups either way.

If you don't have the intellectual courage/honesty to do so, then don't come here with your usual attempted dodges, bluff and bluster....ya look preposterous even for a Post Modern "Prophet".


/shrugs...I have no idea what the answer is, but I know it's not important enough to waste the time looking it up......what's important is to realise it's not illegal now......if you don't like that, change the law........if you can't, shut the fuck up.....

Ahhh, so you are demonstrating your Constitutional right to be willfully ignorant and then prattle on. Not surprising.

Thanks for demonstrating to the reading audience what you MAGA gun flunkies are all about....proud stupidity. If somebody says, "See, once again assault weapons unnecessary in the civilian population used to kill innocents en masse", you gun flunkies rush in like parrots on drugs squawking, "you libs don't even know what type of weapon was used, you just know labels".

So toodles, I asked you (and your brethren) to identify the make & model of the assault weapons used (pictures were given)...that way we can all state if those weapons were formerly banned or always available...which would be a positive point in a discussion.

Intellectually impotent/cowardly folk like you don't dare do an honest discussion. In fact, you now claim that type of information isn't important. Hmm, extreme anti-gun folk say the same thing...they want to ban ALL future guns. Fortunately, rational folk like myself only want rational, logical gun control legislation....idiots like you want NO restrictions on gun availability or accountability. For you, incidents like Tennessee are acceptable.

But the topper here is when you say gems like this: ... what's important is to realise it's not illegal now......if you don't like that, change the law

:whoa::palm:

We DID have a law, you stupid SOB! It was called the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban! You know, the one the GOP gun lobby whores in Congress voted against re-instatement in 2004? Where the very weapons on that list have been used in a series of mass shootings in the last 20 years?

Yeah, THAT law. The one Biden proposes bringing back, and a POS like you is sure to balk against.

You disgust me....hell, you're not even an American. STFU and go deal with your own country's problems.
 
The democrats love transgenders

Oh stop acting stupid. Given the documented number of GOP state and federal congress folk that have been nailed as pedophiles, statutory rapists, sexual abusers, wife beaters, etc., that you jokers keep voting into (or back into) office, I'd dare say that any advocating for "transgender" rights hardly rates as a negative. Just saying.
 
Oh stop acting stupid. Given the documented number of GOP state and federal congress folk that have been nailed as pedophiles, statutory rapists, sexual abusers, wife beaters, etc., that you jokers keep voting into (or back into) office, I'd dare say that any advocating for "transgender" rights hardly rates as a negative. Just saying.

So you will ignore the democrats that did that.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Oh stop acting stupid. Given the documented number of GOP state and federal congress folk that have been nailed as pedophiles, statutory rapists, sexual abusers, wife beaters, etc., that you jokers keep voting into (or back into) office, I'd dare say that any advocating for "transgender" rights hardly rates as a negative. Just saying.


So you will ignore the democrats that did that.

If you're referring to what I previously posted, the Dems aren't innocent....BUT....just do a state by state numbers comparison, the go to the House & Senate. Should be eye opening for you.

https://apnews.com/article/sexual-misconduct-metoo-a3377d14856e4f4fb584509963a7a223

Like I said, wailing and whining about the Dems and their voting records on the whole transgender mess is NOT an accurate comparison to the actual sex crimes of the people you hold so dear.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top