Is God punishing red states with severe weather and destructive tornadoes...

AProudLefty said:
Are you telling me that NOAA forgot to mention that? That and adjusting the graph accordingly, based on statistics.
Click to expand...

There's no evidence your graph is adjusted in any manner. you're welcome to show evidence otherwise. As presented, it simply shows numbers of tornadoes without any correction for any other factors.

I see you've fled from your damages claim.

Did you also happen to notice the flat red trend line in your graph that indicates no statistically significant increase in tornadoes? Due to it being flat and not rising or trending upward? You didn't, did you?
 
Diesel said:
You made a lot of claims about population, migration, and technology. Prove it them.
Click to expand...

You need proof that population has increased in the last 70 years? And that technology has improved? And that suburbs have developed? You realize how stupid you sound?
 
Gondwanaland said:
There's no evidence your graph is adjusted in any manner.
Click to expand...

You misread it. Read it again.

I see you've fled from your damages claim.
Click to expand...

Fled? You merely stated that damages had decreased. It is irrelevant now since YOU said that technology has improved greatly since.

Did you also happen to notice the flat red trend line in your graph that indicates no statistically significant increase in tornadoes? Due to it being flat and not rising or trending upward? You didn't, did you?
Click to expand...

The "trend line" is the average.
 
Stone said:
Why is that not done with any other religions? Could it be because we ARE RIGHT OVER THE TARGET? Yeppers,....THATS IT. :cool:
Click to expand...

No other prophet's name is in the religion name except for Buddhism. I'll go ahead and start typing Bist to help you out. Such relentless Christian grievance. Do you ever do anything except complain and insult people?
 
Stone said:
True,....but its STILL just an abbreviation. Is a football player who plays safety an S or a safety? I have NEVER YET in the whole history of ever hear an announcer say that Ronnie Lott was one of the best S's to ever play the game!...:laugh: They say SAFETY.
Click to expand...

That's exactly how fantasy football is played. No one says "Xtian" out loud, and no sports site spells out "safety". Stop whining.
 
Gondwanaland said:
You need proof that population has increased in the last 70 years? And that technology has improved? And that suburbs have developed? You realize how stupid you sound?
Click to expand...

No, you brain dead cunt. The correlation that those things have with tornadoes.

See, this is why we can't wait for old, crazy fucks like you to finish dying. You ask a question. You get an answer. You say prove it. We prove it. You deny that what we gave you even exists and refuse to open any of it.

Then we ask a question. You give an answer. We say prove it. You say no.

You're a liar and a prick.
 
Stone said:
How many lefties in here drive EV's? Or at least Hybrids? I have a hybrid BTW. How are you heating youre homes, powering your homes? Have you put in Geo thermal? If not......Kindly STFU and lead BY EXAMPLE instead of lip service. Thank you. ;)
Click to expand...

Do you care about immigration?

Are you working the border?
 
AProudLefty said:
You misread it. Read it again.
Click to expand...
You are welcome to present the chart with a circle around any part indicating that its numbers have been adjusted for other factors.
Let's see it.
Fled? You merely stated that damages had decreased. It is irrelevant now since YOU said that technology has improved greatly since.
Click to expand...
I didn't merely state anything. I provided direct evidence for my statement.

You seem confused. My statements wrt technology were about the detection of tornadoes. Not about damages from tornadoes. And you'll recall you were the one declaring that damages were proof. Yet by your own claim, the decrease in damages should be proof against you.
The "trend line" is the average.
Click to expand...

Yes, and the average shows no increase. Do you not grasp how averages work?
 
Diesel said:
No, you brain dead cunt. The correlation that those things have with tornadoes.

See, this is why we can't wait for old, crazy fucks like you to finish dying. You ask a question. You get an answer. You say prove it. We prove it. You deny that what we gave you even exists and refuse to open any of it.

Then we ask a question. You give an answer. We say prove it. You say no.

You're a liar and a prick.
Click to expand...
Oh you need evidence that more people in more places make it more likely that tornadoes will hit something constructed by humans? You really are a fucktard, aren't you?
 
Gondwanaland said:
You are welcome to present the chart with a circle around any part indicating that its numbers have been adjusted for other factors.
Click to expand...

Re-read it. I did not say the graph was adjusted.

I didn't merely state anything. I provided direct evidence for my statement.
Click to expand...

Yes you did: "Not to mention tornado damages have DECREASED". But yes you did provide evidence for that. Again, how is that relevant? It doesn't prove or disprove anything.

You seem confused. My statements wrt technology were about the detection of tornadoes. Not about damages from tornadoes. And you'll recall you were the one declaring that damages were proof. Yet by your own claim, the decrease in damages should be proof against you.
Click to expand...

Now you say it's irrelevant, just as I have stated.

Yes, and the average shows no increase. Do you not grasp how averages work?
Click to expand...

You realize that the graph includes months, right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top