Palin Supporters - Great Examples

christiefan915 said:
She's not 13, she's at least 17. Furthermore, O'Donnell didn't seek her out, she volunteered, and the man beside her wasn't her dad. Even your leader beck said that he was only "guessing" about Seal's age.

Why should libs believe anything rabid righties say when you all spread lies and rumors as easily as you breathe?
Click to expand...

Oh well, seventeen makes it all right for a "so called journalist" to grill like she is an adult..
 
christiefan915 said:
She volunteered to speak, what part of that don't you all get? And how does O'Donnell advising her of the facts translate to a grilling?
Click to expand...
It doesn't matter if she volunteered, there is no great achievement in "catching out" a child. Especially when the "catching out" was answered credibly, then all the supposed adult had was repetition.
 
She probably ain't 13, but she ain't no adult IMO. No great shakes in a reporter dressing down someone like that.
 
Damocles said:
It doesn't matter if she volunteered, there is no great achievement in "catching out" a child. Especially when the "catching out" was answered credibly, then all the supposed adult had was repetition.
Click to expand...

So she's old enough to support a candidate, old enough to speak up on camera but it's O'Donnell's fault for calling her out on the bailout question.

Hypocritical, just like the rumors that she was 13 and accompanied by her father... the age 13 rumor that you introduced into this thread before checking to see if it was accurate.
 
christiefan915 said:
So she's old enough to support a candidate, old enough to speak up on camera but it's O'Donnell's fault for calling her out on the bailout question.

Hypocritical, just like the rumors that she was 13 and accompanied by her father... the age 13 rumor that you introduced into this thread before checking to see if it was accurate.
Click to expand...
Yes, she's a child willing to learn something about politics. But no matter what you say, catching out somebody who hasn't graduated from HS, who looks not to even have entered HS yet, is not great achievement.

I'm embarrassed for the people who would tout this as something of an example of Palin Supporters. First because the kid really got the better of the reporter who had to resort to simple repetition when her question was answered, second they "caught out" a child. If resorting to catching children making mistakes is your method of "winning" debate...

Well, I guess I shouldn't feel sorry for you (I do though), I should celebrate that this is your "Objective Press' major achievement" of the day.
 
Damocles said:
Yes, she's a child willing to learn something about politics. But no matter what you say, catching out somebody who hasn't graduated from HS, who looks not to even have entered HS yet, is not great achievement.

I'm embarrassed for the people who would tout this as something of an example of Palin Supporters. First because the kid really got the better of the reporter who had to resort to simple repetition when her question was answered, second they "caught out" a child. If resorting to catching children making mistakes is your method of "winning" debate...

Well, I guess I shouldn't feel sorry for you (I do though), I should celebrate that this is your "Objective Press' major achievement" of the day.
Click to expand...

You know, I am at some of these political things where reporters are interviewing the crowd but have never been talked to. They always grab some poor sucker who looks about as sharp as a bowling ball to interview. I think the next time I am at one of these things I am going to wear my overalls and take my corn cob pipe and see if they'll talk to me.
 
leaningright said:
You know, I am at some of these political things where reporters are interviewing the crowd but have never been talked to. They always grab some poor sucker who looks about as sharp as a bowling ball to interview. I think the next time I am at one of these things I am going to wear my overalls and take my corn cob pipe and see if they'll talk to me.
Click to expand...

let us know so we can be there to take a picture...lol..
j/k
 
Damocles said:
Yes, she's a child willing to learn something about politics. But no matter what you say, catching out somebody who hasn't graduated from HS, who looks not to even have entered HS yet, is not great achievement.

I'm embarrassed for the people who would tout this as something of an example of Palin Supporters. First because the kid really got the better of the reporter who had to resort to simple repetition when her question was answered, second they "caught out" a child. If resorting to catching children making mistakes is your method of "winning" debate...

Well, I guess I shouldn't feel sorry for you (I do though), I should celebrate that this is your "Objective Press' major achievement" of the day.
Click to expand...

Oh, no need to celebrate my achievement. Celebrate your own for being a RW, rumor-spreading hack whose preference for "accuracy" doesn't extend to fact-checking his own party.
 
christiefan915 said:
Oh, no need to celebrate my achievement. Celebrate your own for being a RW, rumor-spreading hack whose preference for "accuracy" doesn't extend to fact-checking his own party.
Click to expand...
Wow is this the best you've got? Shall we compare some adult Obama voters with this school girl?
 
leaningright said:
You know, I am at some of these political things where reporters are interviewing the crowd but have never been talked to. They always grab some poor sucker who looks about as sharp as a bowling ball to interview. I think the next time I am at one of these things I am going to wear my overalls and take my corn cob pipe and see if they'll talk to me.
Click to expand...
Yeah, me too.
 
christiefan915 said:
Oh, no need to celebrate my achievement. Celebrate your own for being a RW, rumor-spreading hack whose preference for "accuracy" doesn't extend to fact-checking his own party.
Click to expand...
Baseless accusations... wow...

I can only imagine the extreme outrage of the left if O'Reilly went after a child on his show. On this, there's no outrage even from the right, just pointing out how weak it is, how sad, how pitiful, and how there's nary a mention for the "objectivity" of this particular reporter from the hypocrite left who post everything they think is slightly unobjective from Fox....

Instead, y'all gather around in a circle...
 
Damocles said:
Baseless accusations... wow...

I can only imagine the extreme outrage of the left if O'Reilly went after a child on his show. On this, there's no outrage even from the right, just pointing out how weak it is, how sad, how pitiful, and how there's nary a mention for the "objectivity" of this particular reporter from the hypocrite left who post everything they think is slightly unobjective from Fox....

Instead, y'all gather around in a circle...
Click to expand...


Here's some facts from the girls' very own blog:

"She told us she’d be walking up to us. You know like she just stumbled upon us. The shot began… I kept telling myself answer her question well, don’t freak out. Well, I thought she’d ask me the same question. She asked the man beside me (who by the way is NOT my dad) the same question she had before we went on air. Myself on the other hand, not the same story. She had me read my shirt and then proceeded to ask me “Did you know Sarah Palin supported the bailout” to be 100% honest I was like, are you kidding me? She is trying to use my shirt against me. I was so shocked by the craftiness she had that I was truly stumped."

Then there's this comment:

“Norah also claims I told her I voted,” she writes. “That is not true. She never asked my age or if I voted. I’m 17"

First...she's 17, not 13 as you repeated with no verification whatsoever.

Second...she's sporting a snarky t-shirt about the current President. yet was shocked when someone used said shirt as a jumping off point to show how the woman this girl came to see also supported the bailout?

Even when shown to be in error, like most RW ideologues she stubbornly sticks to her preconceived fantasies rather than admit she was mistaken.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Here's some facts from the girls' very own blog:

"She told us she’d be walking up to us. You know like she just stumbled upon us. The shot began… I kept telling myself answer her question well, don’t freak out. Well, I thought she’d ask me the same question. She asked the man beside me (who by the way is NOT my dad) the same question she had before we went on air. Myself on the other hand, not the same story. She had me read my shirt and then proceeded to ask me “Did you know Sarah Palin supported the bailout” to be 100% honest I was like, are you kidding me? She is trying to use my shirt against me. I was so shocked by the craftiness she had that I was truly stumped."

Then there's this comment:

“Norah also claims I told her I voted,” she writes. “That is not true. She never asked my age or if I voted. I’m 17"

First...she's 17, not 13 as you repeated with no verification whatsoever.

Second...she's sporting a snarky t-shirt about the current President. yet was shocked when someone used said shirt as a jumping off point to show how the woman this girl came to see also supported the bailout?

Even when shown to be in error, like most RW ideologues she stubbornly sticks to her preconceived fantasies rather than admit she was mistaken.
Click to expand...
I was guessing the age by how the girl looked in the video, Zappa. One thing I knew, she didn't graduate High School yet.

Again, "stumping" somebody from HS isn't that hard in the political arena. This is nothing to cheer, in fact it points out how the supposed "objective" mainstream press isn't "objective" at all. And if that was an example of her being "stumped", well, she still had the reporter stuttering and repeating.

Seriously, this is your "major victory"? Come on! I hope you run on a platform that solely seeks out children to persecute on TV. At least it will be entertaining when you go down in flames.
 
Damocles said:
I was guessing the age by how the girl looked in the video, Zappa. One thing I knew, she didn't graduate High School yet.

Again, "stumping" somebody from HS isn't that hard in the political arena. This is nothing to cheer, in fact it points out how the supposed "objective" mainstream press isn't "objective" at all. And if that was an example of her being "stumped", well, she still had the reporter stuttering and repeating.

Seriously, this is your "major victory"? Come on! I hope you run on a platform that solely seeks out children to persecute on TV. At least it will be entertaining when you go down in flames.
Click to expand...

I don't think it's a "major victory", I just think it's another example of a Palin supporter not being able to articulate what she finds so fascinating about Palin beyond the standard talking points "she's for upholding the constitution" and "she's for smaller government".
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I don't think it's a "major victory", I just think it's another example of a Palin supporter not being able to articulate what she finds so fascinating about Palin beyond the standard talking points "she's for upholding the constitution" and "she's for smaller government".
Click to expand...
And I think you are mistaken, 17 year olds do not make up the numbers of the Palin Supporters...

At least she is politically aware.
 
Southern Man said:
Wow is this the best you've got? Shall we compare some adult Obama voters with this school girl?
Click to expand...

? What's your point?

I was criticizing beck and the RWs for spreading the rumor that Jackie Seal was only 13 years old, that the guy in the video was her father, and that O'Donnell pounced on her, when she actually volunteered to speak.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top