From Bud Light to Nike, Brands Are Facing Conservative Backlash for Featuring Trans

Guno צְבִי

Guno צְבִי

We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
Why They're Sticking to Their Decisions


Major brands are now increasingly partnering with transgender actors and influencers in their ad campaigns, with massive support from the LGBTQ community and its allies. Brands like Bud Light and Nike, however, have come under fire for featuring trans influencers like Dylan Mulvaney in the face of growing anti-trans hate and legislation.

Despite often being the targets of criticism from online trolls and conservative public figures, advertising shows no sign of slowing down in trans representation and continues to symbolize allyship.

“Including our community in marketing is nothing new, but what is new is the extreme right-wing politicization of a company’s creative and business decisions,” Sarah Kate Ellis, president of the NGO Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLADD), said in a statement to TIME. “Companies will not end the standard business practice of including diverse people in ads and marketing because a small number of loud, fringe of anti-LGBTQ activists make noise on social media.”


“Brands know that LGBTQ inclusion is good for business. It reaches our community and also reaches the growing number of consumers who want to see their LGBTQ friends and family members in ads and campaigns,” Ellis said.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/f...k?cvid=d12afd856cd04f4b8cdd23c25fef36e7&ei=28
 
guno said:
Why They're Sticking to Their Decisions


Major brands are now increasingly partnering with transgender actors and influencers in their ad campaigns, with massive support from the LGBTQ community and its allies. Brands like Bud Light and Nike, however, have come under fire for featuring trans influencers like Dylan Mulvaney in the face of growing anti-trans hate and legislation.

Despite often being the targets of criticism from online trolls and conservative public figures, advertising shows no sign of slowing down in trans representation and continues to symbolize allyship.

“Including our community in marketing is nothing new, but what is new is the extreme right-wing politicization of a company’s creative and business decisions,” Sarah Kate Ellis, president of the NGO Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLADD), said in a statement to TIME. “Companies will not end the standard business practice of including diverse people in ads and marketing because a small number of loud, fringe of anti-LGBTQ activists make noise on social media.”


“Brands know that LGBTQ inclusion is good for business. It reaches our community and also reaches the growing number of consumers who want to see their LGBTQ friends and family members in ads and campaigns,” Ellis said.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/f...k?cvid=d12afd856cd04f4b8cdd23c25fef36e7&ei=28
Click to expand...

Bud Lite sucks. And they love the publicity.
 
They are getting flack from haters. They are self identifying. Tranns and gays have enough trouble going through life. Now we can publically attack them.
 
guno said:
Why They're Sticking to Their Decisions


Major brands are now increasingly partnering with transgender actors and influencers in their ad campaigns, with massive support from the LGBTQ community and its allies. Brands like Bud Light and Nike, however, have come under fire for featuring trans influencers like Dylan Mulvaney in the face of growing anti-trans hate and legislation.

Despite often being the targets of criticism from online trolls and conservative public figures, advertising shows no sign of slowing down in trans representation and continues to symbolize allyship.

“Including our community in marketing is nothing new, but what is new is the extreme right-wing politicization of a company’s creative and business decisions,” Sarah Kate Ellis, president of the NGO Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLADD), said in a statement to TIME. “Companies will not end the standard business practice of including diverse people in ads and marketing because a small number of loud, fringe of anti-LGBTQ activists make noise on social media.”


“Brands know that LGBTQ inclusion is good for business. It reaches our community and also reaches the growing number of consumers who want to see their LGBTQ friends and family members in ads and campaigns,” Ellis said.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/f...k?cvid=d12afd856cd04f4b8cdd23c25fef36e7&ei=28
Click to expand...

Forget about the tranny crap what really gets me is how anyone can actually drink light beer. That's about as screwed up as the tranny crap.
 
Yakuda said:
Forget about the tranny crap what really gets me is how anyone can actually drink light beer. That's about as screwed up as the tranny crap.
Click to expand...

I remember the only lite beer I could tolerate was Michelob (this was before "ultra").

But beer companies had better deal with a simple reality...you do something your customers don't like, they have the right to boycott your product. Time will tell if these type of boycotts will catch on enough to actually change the company ad/promo campaign.
 
Last edited:
guno said:
Why They're Sticking to Their Decisions


Major brands are now increasingly partnering with transgender actors and influencers in their ad campaigns, with massive support from the LGBTQ community and its allies. Brands like Bud Light and Nike, however, have come under fire for featuring trans influencers like Dylan Mulvaney in the face of growing anti-trans hate and legislation.

Despite often being the targets of criticism from online trolls and conservative public figures, advertising shows no sign of slowing down in trans representation and continues to symbolize allyship.

“Including our community in marketing is nothing new, but what is new is the extreme right-wing politicization of a company’s creative and business decisions,” Sarah Kate Ellis, president of the NGO Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLADD), said in a statement to TIME. “Companies will not end the standard business practice of including diverse people in ads and marketing because a small number of loud, fringe of anti-LGBTQ activists make noise on social media.”


“Brands know that LGBTQ inclusion is good for business. It reaches our community and also reaches the growing number of consumers who want to see their LGBTQ friends and family members in ads and campaigns,” Ellis said.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/f...k?cvid=d12afd856cd04f4b8cdd23c25fef36e7&ei=28
Click to expand...

You are a fool. The religious right will boycott these business that put politics above their customers The democrats love immoral agendas and hate Christians
 
Nordberg said:
They are getting flack from haters. They are self identifying. Tranns and gays have enough trouble going through life. Now we can publically attack them.
Click to expand...

Then democrats should stop making it a political issue. No one cares if you keep private
 
guno said:
Why They're Sticking to Their Decisions


Major brands are now increasingly partnering with transgender actors and influencers in their ad campaigns, with massive support from the LGBTQ community and its allies. Brands like Bud Light and Nike, however, have come under fire for featuring trans influencers like Dylan Mulvaney in the face of growing anti-trans hate and legislation.

Despite often being the targets of criticism from online trolls and conservative public figures, advertising shows no sign of slowing down in trans representation and continues to symbolize allyship.

“Including our community in marketing is nothing new, but what is new is the extreme right-wing politicization of a company’s creative and business decisions,” Sarah Kate Ellis, president of the NGO Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLADD), said in a statement to TIME. “Companies will not end the standard business practice of including diverse people in ads and marketing because a small number of loud, fringe of anti-LGBTQ activists make noise on social media.”


“Brands know that LGBTQ inclusion is good for business. It reaches our community and also reaches the growing number of consumers who want to see their LGBTQ friends and family members in ads and campaigns,” Ellis said.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/f...k?cvid=d12afd856cd04f4b8cdd23c25fef36e7&ei=28
Click to expand...

I actually don't give a shit about Dylan Mulvaney, drag performers aren't new. I went to high school in the 1980's there were plenty of gender fluid people back then, This ain't new. What is new is trying to get the young kids to do it. That's new...but Mulvaney isn't a kid so I don't see the problem.
 
Dissidents of the Revolution can maybe live in an off the grid tiny house in the rural areas....so long as they dont talk anyone thus spreading disturbance in the solidarity.......other than that we will do as we are told if we want to participate in life...if we want to have a life.

This is a Dark Age.
 
Quincunx said:
Here's the difference: Chik-Fil-A used their religion to stand AGAINST certain people getting rights. Bud is encouraging ACCEPTANCE of others.

The difference is in the INTENTION.
Click to expand...

why did you intend to treat Chick-fil-A differently than Bud Light?......the difference is merely that Demmycunts LIKE what one company did and NOT what the other did.....
 
Hawkeye10 said:
Dissidents of the Revolution can maybe live in an off the grid tiny house in the rural areas....so long as they dont talk anyone thus spreading disturbance in the solidarity.......other than that we will do as we are told if we want to participate in life...if we want to have a life.

This is a Dark Age.
Click to expand...

Just because you can’t afford electricity, does not mean their is a secret plot against you.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
why did you intend to treat Chick-fil-A differently than Bud Light?......the difference is merely that Demmycunts LIKE what one company did and NOT what the other did.....
Click to expand...

So you didn't read the post you responded to? That's a weird way to function. The words weren't too large, the concept was pretty simple. I thought even YOU could understand it.
 
ptif219 said:
You are a fool. The religious right will boycott these business that put politics above their customers The democrats love immoral agendas and hate Christians
Click to expand...

Why is acceptance of how another human being presents a "political" thing? Don't answer; we know why. It's because bigots and haters and the fearful and weak have tried to turn it into a political issue.

History is against you. You will lose on this issue just as you lost on the racial discrimination issue, the same sex marriage issue, and the women's rights issue.
 
Quincunx said:
So you didn't read the post you responded to? That's a weird way to function. The words weren't too large, the concept was pretty simple. I thought even YOU could understand it.
Click to expand...
I read it....I responded to it....you didn't like it......I say, "who gives a fuck".....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top