AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
okay......you hate Chick-fil-A, didn't hate Bud Light......so what?.....
That is why I call you cun'tard.
Chick-fil-A hate LGBT.
Bud Light embrace LGBT.
okay......you hate Chick-fil-A, didn't hate Bud Light......so what?.....
I read it....I responded to it....you didn't like it......I say, "who gives a fuck".....
Originally Posted by Hawkeye10 View Post
Dissidents of the Revolution can maybe live in an off the grid tiny house in the rural areas....so long as they dont talk anyone thus spreading disturbance in the solidarity.......other than that we will do as we are told if we want to participate in life...if we want to have a life.
This is a Dark Age.
Just because you can’t afford electricity, does not mean their is a secret plot against you.
Why They're Sticking to Their Decisions
Major brands are now increasingly partnering with transgender actors and influencers in their ad campaigns, with massive support from the LGBTQ community and its allies. Brands like Bud Light and Nike, however, have come under fire for featuring trans influencers like Dylan Mulvaney in the face of growing anti-trans hate and legislation.
Despite often being the targets of criticism from online trolls and conservative public figures, advertising shows no sign of slowing down in trans representation and continues to symbolize allyship.
“Including our community in marketing is nothing new, but what is new is the extreme right-wing politicization of a company’s creative and business decisions,” Sarah Kate Ellis, president of the NGO Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLADD), said in a statement to TIME. “Companies will not end the standard business practice of including diverse people in ads and marketing because a small number of loud, fringe of anti-LGBTQ activists make noise on social media.”
“Brands know that LGBTQ inclusion is good for business. It reaches our community and also reaches the growing number of consumers who want to see their LGBTQ friends and family members in ads and campaigns,” Ellis said.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/f...k?cvid=d12afd856cd04f4b8cdd23c25fef36e7&ei=28
Why is acceptance of how another human being presents a "political" thing? Don't answer; we know why. It's because bigots and haters and the fearful and weak have tried to turn it into a political issue.
History is against you. You will lose on this issue just as you lost on the racial discrimination issue, the same sex marriage issue, and the women's rights issue.
As they say in Los Angeles, call me anything you like. Just spell my name correctly.
They are getting flack from haters. They are self identifying. Tranns and gays have enough trouble going through life. Now we can publically attack them.
Have you ever noticed? When I say bad words about Trump, Trump supporters never threaten me. Trump supporters don’t lose their minds and sneeze and cough coke and caine out of their noses. But say something bad about the left…
And yes, Hitler the Nazi, was Left. Leftwing who do not realize Nazism is Left are too uneducated to argue with. Nazis, Communists, Socialists (including “Democratic Socialists” such as “Bernie” the rich guy), are all from the far left Ditch of Death.
I will never vote for Trump because Trump is a jab-pusher. But watch…No Trump supporters will threaten my life. Some accounts may threaten or lose their AI minds, but when you spend even a minute or two looking at those accounts they invariably come from abject Left, or accounts of questionable origin. I am in no danger from core Trump supporters. Core-Biden-supporters are straight-up death-camp-guards in-waiting.
Nazism is right-wing. So is Fascism. You have it wrong. The rightys say because the party Hitler took over had the word socialist in its name, it was lefty. It obviously was not.
Nazism is right-wing. So is Fascism. You have it wrong. The rightys say because the party Hitler took over had the word socialist in its name, it was lefty. It obviously was not.
Then democrats should stop making it a political issue. No one cares if you keep private
Why They're Sticking to Their Decisions
Major brands are now increasingly partnering with transgender actors and influencers in their ad campaigns, with massive support from the LGBTQ community and its allies. Brands like Bud Light and Nike, however, have come under fire for featuring trans influencers like Dylan Mulvaney in the face of growing anti-trans hate and legislation.
Despite often being the targets of criticism from online trolls and conservative public figures, advertising shows no sign of slowing down in trans representation and continues to symbolize allyship.
“Including our community in marketing is nothing new, but what is new is the extreme right-wing politicization of a company’s creative and business decisions,” Sarah Kate Ellis, president of the NGO Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLADD), said in a statement to TIME. “Companies will not end the standard business practice of including diverse people in ads and marketing because a small number of loud, fringe of anti-LGBTQ activists make noise on social media.”
“Brands know that LGBTQ inclusion is good for business. It reaches our community and also reaches the growing number of consumers who want to see their LGBTQ friends and family members in ads and campaigns,” Ellis said.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/f...k?cvid=d12afd856cd04f4b8cdd23c25fef36e7&ei=28
it is a very political issue. They want all the rights and freedoms that any other American citizen has. You do not achieve that by staying hidden.
Just remember, every time some corporation or such takes a hard turn to the Left politically, it almost always crashes and burns. The NFL and NBA had to dump their putsch to the Left because they were hemorrhaging fans with the resultant loss of money. Nike took that hit too. They're hardly the only ones either. The Left is not a good business model for basing your product on most of the time.
Interesting....please explain what was this "hard turn to the Left politically" byt the NFL and NBA that was detrimental financially and fan wise.
No the democrats made it a political issue. The democrats needed a new special interest group. Shows how immoral and evil the democrats are
They are getting flack from haters. They are self identifying. Tranns and gays have enough trouble going through life. Now we can publically attack them.