Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
yeah, you're so right....
this thread is a great burn of palin supporters....man, you guys really showed us.....yeah, that ignorant 17 year old....wow....what fucking studs you are....
Palin Supporters - Great Examples
- Thread starter ib1yysguy
- Start date
yeah, you're so right....
this thread is a great burn of palin supporters....man, you guys really showed us.....yeah, that ignorant 17 year old....wow....what fucking studs you are....
One shouldn't be "proud" that the only person this lady could "catch out" was a child. I am embarrassed for every lefty who supports this as if it is some great accomplishment by the "objective" press.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/02/palin_urges_obama_to_veto_stimulus.html
The reporter was so excited that she "caught" this child... The child was right, if you ask her now, she'd be against them.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Again, I have never said this is any kind of "great accomplishment".
If it is true this girl is seventeen, then she is less than 12 months away from legal voting age, and her disturbing lack of specificity when asked followup questions should be of concern.
I don't doubt for a minute that if positions were reversed, we'd be hearing a chorus of conservative voices telling us how "THAT GIRL is the future of the Democrat party", and lamentations aplenty about how "doomed" the Liberal movement is because of dim-bulbs like her.
Here "lack of specificity" was 100% correct.
I would have said something more like, "Often the VP winds up supporting things they wouldn't normally because they are second on the ticket. Look at Cheney's and Bush's stances on gay marriage. Cheney was for gay marriage, yet he knew he wasn't the top of the ticket."
I've known people on this website who steep themselves in politics constantly that wouldn't have answered as well as this young girl. Less than 12 months from voting and she did a pretty good job. Only somebody who denies reality based on partisanship would say she was "caught" even, let alone lacking in knowledge.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
yeah, you're so right....
this thread is a great burn of palin supporters....man, you guys really showed us.....yeah, that ignorant 17 year old....wow....what fucking studs you are....
You know, you can buy you some Desenex to put on that case of the red-ass you seem to be sporting there, Chief!
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
You know, you can buy you some Desenex to put on that case of the red-ass you seem to be sporting there, Chief!
i don't even know what that is....but you sure seem to!
It's for diaper rash, and of course the lard ass knows all there is to know about being butt hurt. With an ass that big, he probably buys it by the cargo load.
That and obviously he wasn't changing his daughter's diapers enough otherwise Desenex wouldn't even be needed.
Socrtease
Verified User
At 17 years of age I could tell you every major position of both Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan ( that was the last Presidential election when I was 17) . Hell at the age of 14, the year of the 1980 election I could tell you every major difference between Reagan and Carter. The fact that she was 17 and didn't know what Palin stood for only shows that in a year she won't know what people stand for only that they have an R behind their name. There are lots of people who do the same thing as long as the person they vote for has a D behind their name.
Lowaicue
英語在香港
I am quite surprised that I need to explain.
If she succeeds and is elected she will head the governing party.
She will be, in part, responsible for policy decisions.
She will, in part, be responsible for choosing her senior decision makers.
She has demonstrated that she is not smart enough to do that.
Therefore you will have a four year period with the potential of being even worse than the time of bush the oaf.
At the end of the four years there will not be sufficient members of the republican party to form an opposition. The party will all but disappear.
But dont let logic get in your way. There is precious little in RW American politics.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
i don't support palin, but how exactly has she demonstrated she is not smart enough to be president? for all obama's book smarts, he is an idiot president
meme
New member
yeah but he gives a good speech off a teleprompter..
he had no Foreign policy experience and he was a JUNIOR Senator for what, 144 days...
so we all know he is way more smarter and more qualified than Palin who was a mayor and a GOVONOR of a state...
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
A 17-year old isn't a child.
No they are inexperienced "know it all's" who are more often wrong then they are right. Like you, and others your age, they are usually ideological dweebs who need real life experience before their opinions can have weight and substance...real safe people for asshole lightweight reporters to ask questions to and easilly play a "gottcha" move on. The reporter looked like an idiot; the girl looked like a young girl being an ideological Palin supporter.
How about that video with all of those older Obamabot voters who didn't know shit from shinola???
Last edited:
christiefan915
Catalyst
Lefties don't mind using kids? LOL. Let's talk about how righties used Bristol and Levi at the convention to prop up Palin's fiction that the kids were in love and ready to get married...trying to take away the sting of her teenage pregnancy. Can you say AGENDA?
O'Donnell said nothing wrong. Seal is a 17-year old with a teenage undeveloped brain who went on the attack at the perceived slight. Any parent knows that this is what kids do. It's their favorite defense mechanism, before they mature enough to learn other coping skills. You can continue harping on O'Donnell's "unfairness" but the video speaks for itself. There was no attack.
meme
New member
christiefan915
Catalyst
meme
New member
Par for the course.
I'm done arguing with a idiot who continually uses Palin's children for a punching bag ..yet you all harp about how the children of a politician should be off base..
very low standards the lefties have and continually prove..
Last edited:
zappasguitar
Well-known member
And as we all know, Righties don't mind using kids either.
Except when Righties use kids, it's for illicit backroom sex...anyone remember Mark Foley?
Representative Foley sure accomplished his agenda...having sex with underage boys!
meme
New member
omfriggenG...
look at Bwany Franks and Gerry Stubbs then you all can blow some smoke up our asses..
Studds was a central figure in the 1983 Congressional page sex scandal, when he and Representative Dan Crane were censured by the House of Representatives for separate sexual relationships with minors — in Studds' case, a 1973 sexual relationship with a 17-year-old male congressional page.
[ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerry_Studds[/ame]