Peer review climate science revealed

tinfoil

Banned
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/20/AR2009112004093_pf.html


Busted. Those of you warmers who still trust this group of "peers" to bring you accurate science are like religious folks.

LOL You warmers make me laugh

a596hd.png
 
Did you see the NYT? They are trying to say they refuse to publish anything that wasn't intended originally for publishing. As if they didn't report on Watergate and myriad other things back when they used to work for a living. Or that fake memo....
 
http://www.examiner.com/x-25061-Cli...-and-emails?cid=exrss-Climate-Change-Examiner


Check out this shit!


From Michael Mann (truth doesn't matter):


Perhaps we'll do a simple update to the Yamal post, e.g. linking Keith/s new page--Gavin t? As to the issues of robustness, particularly w.r.t. inclusion of the Yamal series, we actually emphasized that (including the Osborn and Briffa '06 sensitivity test) in our original post! As we all know, this isn't about truth at all, its about plausibly deniable accusations.
 
LOL
Yeah, right, you fucking warmer. You're shown to be an idiot. I've been right the whole time, you asshole

Now go buy some carbon credits, you dolt

LOL

I haven't really argued AGW for years now. When I do bring it up, I usually say that it doesn't even matter at this point; even if we stopped everything cold turkey - a fantasy - it wouldn't make a difference, and that's IF we're a major part of the cause, which I have also stated is almost impossible to prove either way.

And it IS impossible to prove either way. I don't know why you seem to believe you have "proven" that man cannot be a cause or contributor...because they found an email chain?

Get real.
 
LOL

I haven't really argued AGW for years now. When I do bring it up, I usually say that it doesn't even matter at this point; even if we stopped everything cold turkey - a fantasy - it wouldn't make a difference, and that's IF we're a major part of the cause, which I have also stated is almost impossible to prove either way.

And it IS impossible to prove either way. I don't know why you seem to believe you have "proven" that man cannot be a cause or contributor...because they found an email chain?

Get real.

Yeah, well, I'm more concerned about the tax implications than the science, and i'm concerned enough about the science to fucking learn it.
 
Yeah, well, I'm more concerned about the tax implications than the science, and i'm concerned enough about the science to fucking learn it.

Well, while you've been immersed in the science, you seem to have missed the economic & national security implications of continuing to send hundreds of billions of dollars to the Middle East for oil, when we could be focusing much more on developing domestic sources of energy, which would boost employment & tax revenue here in America.
 
Well, while you've been immersed in the science, you seem to have missed the economic & national security implications of continuing to send hundreds of billions of dollars to the Middle East for oil, when we could be focusing much more on developing domestic sources of energy, which would boost employment & tax revenue here in America.

While I am glad that you have finally come around, even on this site you used to call me an idiot for suggesting the lack of warming over the past decade was a sign the man-made global warming theory was flawed.

That said, you are correct. We should get the Dems to stop blocking domestic drilling because domestic drilling not only will bring jobs home, but it will also enable us to enact OUR environmental standards on the production of oil that we use. Then we should push forward with alt/clean energy R&D (which means Reps backed by big oil need to get on board).
 
While I am glad that you have finally come around, even on this site you used to call me an idiot for suggesting the lack of warming over the past decade was a sign the man-made global warming theory was flawed.

That said, you are correct. We should get the Dems to stop blocking domestic drilling because domestic drilling not only will bring jobs home, but it will also enable us to enact OUR environmental standards on the production of oil that we use. Then we should push forward with alt/clean energy R&D (which means Reps backed by big oil need to get on board).

You & your little gotcha's - very counterproducive. I have been on board with domestic drilling for a pretty good while now...
 
LOL

I haven't really argued AGW for years now. When I do bring it up, I usually say that it doesn't even matter at this point; even if we stopped everything cold turkey - a fantasy - it wouldn't make a difference, and that's IF we're a major part of the cause, which I have also stated is almost impossible to prove either way.

And it IS impossible to prove either way. I don't know why you seem to believe you have "proven" that man cannot be a cause or contributor...because they found an email chain?

Get real.

apparently you have.....

The 14 warmest years ON RECORD have taken place since 1990.

I dunno...would you call that a trend, or an anomoly, with your vast expertise?

Or would you rather isolate 1998 & 2007?

What would a climatolagist do....oh, think...think....

Don't waste any more of my time tonight. You're in over your head; I actually haven't seen someone so clueless & simplistic on a topic since Dano.
 
And why the fuck do you follow me around like that?

Here's a little clue; what I did last week? That was you. I was showing you what it was like to come on the board every day, and have to deal with you.

But you didn't learn. You didn't get the lesson. You're still the same ol' annoying troll.
 
And that's a shame about you, too, Freak - thought you knew what AGW was, as well.

Oh, and look - something I said from that thread you posted is perfectly consistent w/ what I said on this thread: "I don't even start global warming threads, anymore. Frankly, I don't think there is much we can do about it at this point even if we took radical action, and the less-than-half-measures that are often proposed, even by Dems, certainly won't amount to squat."

At least you've made a new friend in Yurt, Freakie...
 
Last edited:
Well, while you've been immersed in the science, you seem to have missed the economic & national security implications of continuing to send hundreds of billions of dollars to the Middle East for oil, when we could be focusing much more on developing domestic sources of energy, which would boost employment & tax revenue here in America.

Blah blah blah. besides, I'm all for newer BETTER technologies, but I don't want to pay extra for inferior solutions that have been shelved until the government arm could be used to support the failing technology
 
And why the fuck do you follow me around like that?

Here's a little clue; what I did last week? That was you. I was showing you what it was like to come on the board every day, and have to deal with you.

But you didn't learn. You didn't get the lesson. You're still the same ol' annoying troll.

why do you lie so much? i'm assuming you're talking to me as you're were in fact trolling me last week....what is unfortunate for you is that you started it....you were not giving me a lesson as i did not troll you....nor do i even post to you everyday....you're the one who started that shit last week....it is absolutely false that i did that to you....

i really thought this week was going to be an honest one for you, i'm disappointed....but still hold out hope for you
 
Back
Top