How about the topic? The peer reviewers, the holy gods whom we are all told are honest and impartial, are bullies.
Indeed, that seems to be the message of the day.
lmao... you argue that a trend line drawn over a DECADE (decade plus now) is not significant? When the data they use only goes back 130 years (and is questionable at best)? It is essentially over 8% of the data set. That is statistically significant. Period.
ESPECIALLY when the whole AGW theory is based on CO2 and other emissions being the primary cause of global warming. Yet when CO2 and other emissions increase for the past decade and yet the global temperatures do not exceed that which where they were at in 1998... you don't like what constitutes the trend?
How about the topic? The peer reviewers, the holy gods whom we are all told are honest and impartial, are bullies.
It's embarassing, and they're getting their due...
I'm of the mind to have mercy on you. Nearly remind me of myself and GW. Honesty is the best, regardless of hits. It hurts.
lmao... you argue that a trend line drawn over a DECADE (decade plus now) is not significant? When the data they use only goes back 130 years (and is questionable at best)? It is essentially over 8% of the data set. That is statistically significant. Period.
ESPECIALLY when the whole AGW theory is based on CO2 and other emissions being the primary cause of global warming. Yet when CO2 and other emissions increase for the past decade and yet the global temperatures do not exceed that which where they were at in 1998... you don't like what constitutes the trend?
Then why can't you take those idiots on "teabagger" thread to task for their bad behavior? "They were askin' for it"...c'mon, Annie. Practice what you preach.
lol....you first big guy
i'm still lmao how damo pwned you and forced you to sarcastically call jarod out...we all know you didn't really mean it and you wouldn't have done it except for damo....
why don't you practice what you preach![]()
That's sad, Yurt! I did "go first" - that's what Annie was commenting on.
And wow, do you idolize Damo for that; that's the 2nd time you've mentioned it! You always omit how he was unable to do the same, even after I asked him to a few times.
Tunnel vision. Bad on you...
![]()
I believe that the warmest year of the 20th century is now 1934 and not 1998 after the data was re-examined.apparently you have.....
LOL - you call me the "board inquisitor," just after saying what you've called me on & before saying how I'm always 'running.' Oh, and after another post which was irrelevant to the topic, but where you again demanded that I act a certain way.
You're a human projector, Yurtie. You lie, and contradict yourself, and troll, and fail to engage in "debate," and make a hypocrite of yourself here, there & everywhere, so naturally, you accuse other posters of the same, constantly!
Ya got nuthin'. You took a beating here tonight, and still can't admit you're wrong about a few things. You're a hack & a troll...what a bummer!
LOL - you call me the "board inquisitor," just after saying what you've called me on & before saying how I'm always 'running.' Oh, and after another post which was irrelevant to the topic, but where you again demanded that I act a certain way.
You're a human projector, Yurtie. You lie, and contradict yourself, and troll, and fail to engage in "debate," and make a hypocrite of yourself here, there & everywhere, so naturally, you accuse other posters of the same, constantly!
Ya got nuthin'. You took a beating here tonight, and still can't admit you're wrong about a few things. You're a hack & a troll...what a bummer!