When will Al Gore respond?

Onceler said:
You're just sore because you haven't had a worship-worthy politician on the right since Reagan. Although, come to think of it, you seemed to have an unhealthy adoration of Bush...
Click to expand...
Wasn't Bush their Mesiah that was called upon by God to be President? Wasn't Bush The Messiah the one they all walked in lock step with no matter how badly he fucked up? LOL
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Yes, you've provided the opinion of one political partisan with unsubstantiated claims siting one non peer reviewed paper as evidence that the whole anthropogenic climate change issue is a complete hoax.

SF you're arising to a level of hackery and scientific ignorance on a Dixieonian scale.
Click to expand...

too funny coming from the guy that used the opinion of one politician (herself) to claim that the "myth" she was bribed to vote for the h/c bill was debunked....

:)
 
Superfreak said:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/11/24/the_fix_is_in_99280.html

Surely Al Gore will be clear all of this up for us. He will put his vast scientific background at full throttle and remove these naysayers with fact and truth.

Please save us Al.
Click to expand...

did you see him on snl this weekend....he is going to put bags of water against congressmen's doors, knock, then run away and leave a note saying; the glaciers thank you....alternatively, he will plant trees in their front yard with guns on their branches.....
 
i still have little doubt that 6.7Billion people and growing can fuck up this earth.. And besides we do need to create alternative energy simply so we can get the fuck off of the arab oil nipple. The costs to keep oil price down via military is far greater then any global warming costs.
 
Chapdog said:
i still have little doubt that 6.7Billion people and growing can fuck up this earth.. And besides we do need to create alternative energy simply so we can get the fuck off of the arab oil nipple. The costs to keep oil price down via military is far greater then any global warming costs.
Click to expand...

Mega-ditto's on this one...
 
Yurt said:
too funny coming from the guy that used the opinion of one politician (herself) to claim that the "myth" she was bribed to vote for the h/c bill was debunked....

:)
Click to expand...
Like hell I did. I didn't use anyones opinion. I went to the exact page of the HC Bill referenced and proved there was no language what so ever giving funds to the State of Louisiana on that page. That was so easy to debunk a child (or even a Republican) could do it! LOL
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Yes, you've provided the opinion of one political partisan with unsubstantiated claims siting one non peer reviewed paper as evidence that the whole anthropogenic climate change issue is a complete hoax.

SF you're arising to a level of hackery and scientific ignorance on a Dixieonian scale.
Click to expand...

LMAO....

You quite obviously have not read the article, nor have you heard about the emails that were stolen and released. This is hardly the first article to address this issue. While I agree that at this point we are simply relying on the emails and the articles written based on them, that is hardly cause for you to come in and dismiss them.

It is quite comical that you come in with your 'one non peer reviewed' line of bullshit given that the article discusses emails that appear to demonstrate the deliberate suppression of any opposing views from scientific journals. Hence, hindering any opposing views from GETTING the so called 'peer-review'. You also ignore that there WERE peer-reviewed articles that made it into the journals... which LED to the attempts to suppress further articles of that nature. (again, admittedly this is based on the emails presented thus far)

It is funny how you try to spin this as 'scientific ignorance' and 'hackery' when your knee jerk reaction is to fall in line, drink your kool-aid and denounce anything that might hurt your 'man causes global warming' theory.

Tell us Mott... WHY is it that they continue to FAIL to release the data that supports their claims?????

I know... you won't even attempt to address that question. You will try to spin the discussion on to some other topic.... because you are 'intelligent' when it comes to the 'science' behind it.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Fixed that for you Damo :)
Click to expand...
Oh, I'm happy of that indeed, but that doesn't change that the people who used to mock others for worship cannot seem to shake the habit themselves. Yet instead of a bit of introspection we get, "Do you remember when people on your side did it?"

Yeah, that was embarrassing, but it is in the past. Now as we stroll on towards the future, there are some of us belly-crawling because they can't prostrate themselves enough before a politician. This time it isn't our side that is embarrassed.
 
Do the AGWers really believe that all of this is a conspiracy to discredit the AGWers? All of this would be to easy to disprove if they wanted to. Instead, they have admitted they are real because they have asked the police to investigate the hacking.
 
Socrtease said:
Do the AGWers really believe that all of this is a conspiracy to discredit the AGWers? All of this would be to easy to disprove if they wanted to. Instead, they have admitted they are real because they have asked the police to investigate the hacking.
Click to expand...

Of course, you do realize, that Mott will now state that you are scientifically ignorant for suggesting the above

I mean how dare anyone point out that the AGW'ers refuse to release their data.

How dare anyone point out the fact that it is the AGW'ers that are suppressing information (or at least attempting to do so)?
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Like hell I did. I didn't use anyones opinion. I went to the exact page of the HC Bill referenced and proved there was no language what so ever giving funds to the State of Louisiana on that page. That was so easy to debunk a child (or even a Republican) could do it! LOL
Click to expand...

uh...you never went back and answered in that thread in APP....damo had a link where she admitted she got the money...its in the APP...i would like to see your reference, in fact there have been about 4 or 5 that have made comments against your so called proof....

APP
 
Socrtease said:
Because if that is one of the leading causes there is no way to tax the sun and make it give money to poor under developed countries.
Click to expand...
I understand the political motivation. What difference does it make to a Liberal's goal if climate change is man-made, due to circumstances beyond his control, or a combination of things?
 
Socrtease said:
Because if that is one of the leading causes there is no way to tax the sun and make it give money to poor under developed countries.
Click to expand...

hey!.... give Mott a chance to answer these questions. I am quite certain he has valid answers... he probably just went to lunch. He will be back any moment to answer the questions.
 
Mott will be along shortly... I just know it... no way does he accuse me of being ignorant of science and then do nothing to support his absurd comments. Because that would leave him in the same position as the AGWers who are trying to suppress opposition by shouting 'consensus' or some such nonsense.
 
I'm wondering about Mott also. Where's the dude at? I bet he's a true believer like IB1 and his faith has not been shaken. Like IB1, I bet he believes the emails are fake-- A plant by Big Oil! Muhahahhahaha
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top