The Supreme Court has been destroyed — and the perpetrator thinks he's the victim

martin said:
By taking away the established Constitutional right to an abortion.
Click to expand...

There is no right to abortion in the constitution. A previous SCOTUS made it up. If you want it as an established right amend the constitution don't make shit up. But you leftists don't do do you? It's easier to legislate through the judiciary isn't it?
 
Earl said:
It was never there, Marty.

Poor Marty.
Click to expand...

For what benefit it may be to you low IQ ignoramuses:

The Bill of Rights is silent on many of the individual rights it established. To take one of your favorites, the Second Amendment grants the right "to bear arms". Machine guns are a type of "arms", so are atomic bombs. Neither may be lawfully possessed as even you know and accept. Likewise, The Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment says nothing about "a right to privacy" but the Court long ago found that this right exists under the Due Process Clause. In 1973, in the case of Roe v. Wade, the Court found a woman's right to an abortion existed as a Constitutional right under her Constitutional right to privacy. From that moment on, until Dobbs, a Constitutional right to an abortion existed under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. Some day the right is sure to exist again.
 
Last edited:
martin said:
For what benefit it may be to you low IQ ignoramuses:

The Bill of Rights is silent on many of the individual rights it established. To take one of your favorites, the Second Amendment grants the right "to bear arms". Machine guns are a type of "arms", so are atomic bombs. Neither may be lawfully possessed as even you know and accept. Likewise, The Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment says nothing about "a right to privacy" but the Court long ago found that this right exists under the Due Process Clause. In 1973, in the case of Roe v. Wade, the Court found a woman's right to an abortion existed as a Constitutional right under her Constitutional right of privacy. From that moment on, until Dobbs, a Constitutional right to an abortion existed under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. Some day the right is sure to exist again.

You guys
Click to expand...

the Constitution does not 'grant' rights. The Constitution does not provide a list of rights that it gives to the people. The Constitutions sole purpose is to provide the framework for the federal government, prescribe certain powers to that government, and provide specific prohibitions that the government absolutely cannot do.
 
martin said:
For what benefit it may be to you low IQ ignoramuses:

The Bill of Rights is silent on many of the individual rights it established. To take one of your favorites, the Second Amendment grants the right "to bear arms". Machine guns are a type of "arms", so are atomic bombs. Neither may be lawfully possessed as even you know and accept. Likewise, The Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment says nothing about "a right to privacy" but the Court long ago found that this right exists under the Due Process Clause. In 1973, in the case of Roe v. Wade, the Court found a woman's right to an abortion existed as a Constitutional right under her Constitutional right of privacy. From that moment on, until Dobbs, a Constitutional right to an abortion existed under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. Some day the right is sure to exist again.

You guys
Click to expand...

So in other words one court "found" a right and another corrected the error. You want it to be a federal right then amend the constitution. Don't legislate from the bench
 
Last edited:
martin said:
For what benefit it may be to you low IQ ignoramuses:

The Bill of Rights is silent on many of the individual rights it established. To take one of your favorites, the Second Amendment grants the right "to bear arms". Machine guns are a type of "arms", so are atomic bombs. Neither may be lawfully possessed as even you know and accept. Likewise, The Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment says nothing about "a right to privacy" but the Court long ago found that this right exists under the Due Process Clause. In 1973, in the case of Roe v. Wade, the Court found a woman's right to an abortion existed as a Constitutional right under her Constitutional right of privacy. From that moment on, until Dobbs, a Constitutional right to an abortion existed under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. Some day the right is sure to exist again.

You guys
Click to expand...

That was ugly, Marty, take it back.

Why do you get so ugly when you baby killers lose at the Supreme Court?

Pay attention, Marty.

Before Dobbs, abortion was not nor has it ever been an enumerated right, as codified by...Dobbs. Nothing has changed in the Constitution before Roe or after Roe.

Roe was an UN-Constitutional right by the Justices who supported baby killing...in violation of the Constitution. No such right has ever existed...in the Constitution.

Be a good lad and accept that your side, the side that supports baby-killing, has lost on the issue of baby killing.

Future generations of babies who did not have their heads crushed by the abortionists, will thank this Supreme Court who said that there is no enumerated right, in the

Constitution, to crush their heads...Marty.

Are we clear on that Marty?

I hope so, I am beginning to think that you low IQ ignoramuses are incapable of rational thought.

Oh, that was ugly...but accurate, Marty.
 
Last edited:
Earl said:
That was ugly, Marty, take it back.

Why do you get so ugly when you baby killers lose at the Supreme Court?

Pay attention, Marty.

Before Dobbs, abortion was not nor has it ever been an enumerated right, as codified by...Dobbs. Nothing has changed in the Constitution before Roe or after Roe.

Roe was an UN-Constitutional right by the Justices who supported baby killing...in violation of the Constitution. No such right has ever existed...in the Constitution.

Be a good lad and accept that your side, the side that supports baby-killing, has lost on the issue of baby killing.

Future generations of babies who did not have their heads crushed by the abortionists, will thank this Supreme Court who said that there is no enumerated right, in the

Constitution, to crush their heads...Marty.

Are we clear on that Marty?

I hope so, I am beginning to think that you low IQ ignoramuses are incapable of rational thought.

Oh, that was ugly...but accurate, Marty.
Click to expand...

Another declaration minus argument from dumbo, well, plus the inevitable personal insult. Dumbo shows every day that debate arguments are beyond him. In my case, he's also is a daily pest. My first post in this exchange was at 5:54. The pest pounced at 6:00.

Having pointed out that the Constitution contains many rights that only the Court has enumerated, such as the right to privacy, dumbo responds with slurs and a single declaration: that abortion is not an enumerated right.
 
martin said:
Another declaration minus argument from dumbo, well, plus the inevitable personal insult. Dumbo shows every day that debate arguments are beyond him. In my case, he's also is a daily pest. My first post in this exchange was at 5:54. The pest pounced at 6:00.

Having pointed out that the Constitution contains many rights that only the Court has enumerated, such as the right to privacy, dumbo responds with slurs and a single declaration: that abortion is not an enumerated right.
Click to expand...

You drew first blood, Marty.

Originally Posted by martin View Post
"For what benefit it may be to you low IQ ignoramuses:"

I responded.

This is a truism, an eternal truth... abortion is not an enumerated right.

You don't have to take my word for it, Marty, read Dobbs.

Stop whining and get over it. We lived with an UN-Constitutional Roe for 51 years... since 1972.


19-1392 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ( ...
Supreme Court of the United States (.gov)
https://www.supremecourt.gov › opinions
PDF
Jun 24, 2022 — Held: The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the states.

Ya esta, Marty. The fat lady has sung.
 
Last edited:
SmarterthanYou said:
the Constitution does not 'grant' rights. The Constitution does not provide a list of rights that it gives to the people. The Constitutions sole purpose is to provide the framework for the federal government, prescribe certain powers to that government, and provide specific prohibitions that the government absolutely cannot do.
Click to expand...

This is why it's called, "The Bill of Prohibitions".
 
Yakuda said:
So youre saying anything not explicitly prohibited is allowable. Great then owning a AR 15 "assault rifle" is cool. I love agreement.
Click to expand...

That is what the justices have said about their financial doings



That was they can get money from anyone and not face any rules or laws
 
evince said:
That is what the justices have said about their financial doings



That was they can get money from anyone and not face any rules or laws
Click to expand...

As long as I can have my "assault" rifle.

Like I told the other mental toddler if you saw this as a "liberal" court we wouldn't be having this discussion
 
Earl said:
That was ugly, Marty, take it back.

Why do you get so ugly when you baby killers lose at the Supreme Court?

Pay attention, Marty.

Before Dobbs, abortion was not nor has it ever been an enumerated right, as codified by...Dobbs. Nothing has changed in the Constitution before Roe or after Roe.

Roe was an UN-Constitutional right by the Justices who supported baby killing...in violation of the Constitution. No such right has ever existed...in the Constitution.

Be a good lad and accept that your side, the side that supports baby-killing, has lost on the issue of baby killing.

Future generations of babies who did not have their heads crushed by the abortionists, will thank this Supreme Court who said that there is no enumerated right, in the

Constitution, to crush their heads...Marty.

Are we clear on that Marty?

I hope so, I am beginning to think that you low IQ ignoramuses are incapable of rational thought.

Oh, that was ugly...but accurate, Marty.
Click to expand...

So you will be executing woman for having abortions?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top