Sotomayor got millions from publishing company while not recusing from cases

According to a report in the Daily Wire, she received $1.9 million from the publishing house in 2012. In 2013, she helped decide whether the court should take up a legal dispute between the company and a classmate of Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, who said his book proposal was stolen and used to make the movie “The Social Network.”

The conservative outlet reported that this was not the only time Justice Sotomayor participated in the justices’ conference about which appeals to grant. It also noted a case involving a woman who claimed the publishing house copied her children’s book.

The justices did not take up either case.


When the court declines to hear an appeal, it usually doesn’t publicly say which, if any, among the justices might have wanted to do so.


Poor corn pone
 
The rules don't apply because she's a liberal . If she was a black conservative the media and democrats would attack her.
 
guno said:
According to a report in the Daily Wire, she received $1.9 million from the publishing house in 2012. In 2013, she helped decide whether the court should take up a legal dispute between the company and a classmate of Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, who said his book proposal was stolen and used to make the movie “The Social Network.”

The conservative outlet reported that this was not the only time Justice Sotomayor participated in the justices’ conference about which appeals to grant. It also noted a case involving a woman who claimed the publishing house copied her children’s book.

The justices did not take up either case.


Poor corn pone
Click to expand...




Of course u have no link
 
guno said:
Your link dummy

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/may/4/sonia-sotomayor-got-millions-publishing-company-wh/
Click to expand...


It is not known how Justice Sotomayor voted on whether to take up either case, though she did not publicly recuse herself.

Guess u missed that part



The Supreme Court does not reveal how individual justices vote when it comes to “cert,” but it does note when they recuse, which Sotomayor did not.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/may/4/sonia-sotomayor-got-millions-publishing-company-wh/
 
volsrock said:
It is not known how Justice Sotomayor voted on whether to take up either case, though she did not publicly recuse herself.

Guess u missed that part



The Supreme Court does not reveal how individual justices vote when it comes to “cert,” but it does note when they recuse, which Sotomayor did not.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/may/4/sonia-sotomayor-got-millions-publishing-company-wh/
Click to expand...

^^^^^^^^^^^

217ac39bc399bd407d2805d86833b9b4d0bf38b7.gif
 
guno said:
According to a report in the Daily Wire, she received $1.9 million from the publishing house in 2012. In 2013, she helped decide whether the court should take up a legal dispute between the company and a classmate of Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, who said his book proposal was stolen and used to make the movie “The Social Network.”

The conservative outlet reported that this was not the only time Justice Sotomayor participated in the justices’ conference about which appeals to grant. It also noted a case involving a woman who claimed the publishing house copied her children’s book.

The justices did not take up either case.


When the court declines to hear an appeal, it usually doesn’t publicly say which, if any, among the justices might have wanted to do so.


Poor corn pone
Click to expand...

:bigthink: The facts, the WHOLE truth...hmmm?
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
It appears you can't read your own sources. Why am I not surprised?

The justices did not take up either case.

If the justices didn't take up the cases, then there is no argument about recusal.
Click to expand...

Sheet wearing wonks like old Volsrock can never be accused of reading carefully and comprehensively.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top