How Long Will Waterhead Believe in Global Warming?

Waterhead will believe in Global Warming...

  • Until Al Gore admits he was misled.

    Votes: 2 14.3%
  • Until Obama drops it from his political agenda completely.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Until the day he dies!

    Votes: 4 28.6%
  • Until it is socially uncool and un-Grind-like to believe it!

    Votes: 8 57.1%

  • Total voters
    14
Ya know, there are some people on this forum that I can respect/believe, therefore, I'll go with the idea that global warming (man made) is in hurting status, if not done for. Now, could somebody hack some oil company computers and verify that there is like 500 years worth of oil left, and bring the price of oil down to like $20 a barrell so I can buy and afford to drive my Hummer.
 
they cooked to books so the "science" would make their case.
But the science is failing
You can only site this one case in which a credibility gap exist yet you consistently ignore data that contradicts your position while convienantly cherry picking that which agrees with your views.

I did an all exhaustive search (10 seconds) and came up with several thousand hits on "peer reviewed papers on anthropogenic climate change". This alone leads me to believe that your just another political hack who is profoundly ignorant on scientific matters.
 
There is more evidence that GW is real than evidence that it is not.

That is how science works guys.

:rofl:The evidence that Saddam had WMD was more reliable than the evidence supporting man-induced GW...warmers are idiots....:rofl:
 
I wish I could give you rep for this.

That said, I answered until it wasn't 'cool'. Stupid puns aside (don't say any), Watermark is actually pretty smart and I figure that once he no longer has people trying to dick slap him over global warming, he'll wake up and understand the failure of many of his positions.

And Watermark, I know you'll read this. Everything about you right now, is trendy. The 'socialism', the 'anti religion', everything that you present of yourself on here 99% of the time is trendy. Just so ya know.

I seriously doubt Water actually believes in AGW.... I think he simply enjoys being the little emotive troll running around playing the antagonist...

He sees chains... he cannot resist the temptation to pull them....
 
You can only site this one case in which a credibility gap exist yet you consistently ignore data that contradicts your position while convienantly cherry picking that which agrees with your views.

I did an all exhaustive search (10 seconds) and came up with several thousand hits on "peer reviewed papers on anthropogenic climate change". This alone leads me to believe that your just another political hack who is profoundly ignorant on scientific matters.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/...s-the-most-influential-tree-in-the-world.html
 
You can only site this one case in which a credibility gap exist yet you consistently ignore data that contradicts your position while convienantly cherry picking that which agrees with your views.

I did an all exhaustive search (10 seconds) and came up with several thousand hits on "peer reviewed papers on anthropogenic climate change". This alone leads me to believe that your just another political hack who is profoundly ignorant on scientific matters.

and how many of those papers used the data produced by Mann, Jones or Brifa?

How many of them were 'reviewed' by other hacks in on the scam?
 
Back
Top