Tinkerpeach
Member
Again, I never denied evolution
But thanks for posting the evidence that you are a liar so everyone can see it
Trump confesses, again!
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
But thanks for posting the evidence that you are a liar so everyone can see it
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
LOL, another idiot who thinks Intelligent Design is science. But I digress. Back to Trumps criminal activities
Yes, let's. I fell for the age-old MAGAT tactic of "Hey! Look over there! It's Hunter!"
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
You might want to waddle off now, Stinkerbelle, seeing as how you've once again been soundly and publicly spanked.
BTW, your #MalignantMessiah confessed to the charges yesterday, right in front of God and his MAGAT dupes. No amount of whining about independent voters, evolution, monkeys, and so on can change that. He's going to prison.
And the villagers rejoiced!
Yes, let's. I fell for the age-old MAGAT tactic of "Hey! Look over there! It's Hunter!"
It's more fun talking about Trump the twice impeached, twice indicted, found liable for sexual abuse, forever disgraced ex-President.
I love vivisecting Intelligent Design advocates. It's like taking candy from a baby, but it is a guilty pleasure.
It appears she doesn’t understand what an Independent voter is, she has many misconceptions.
Yes, because I have done it. I voted for Sarah Palin as Governor because she professes to be something she wasn’t, but at the time, her positions lined up with mine. I also voted for Frank and Lisa Murkowski because I felt they represented my positions and knew a Republican would win and wanted the least crazy. I have also voted for Republican judges and mayors. I voted for a Republican judge in Texas because I felt he was doing a great job. I haven’t found any sane Republicans to vote for in Texas, they’re all Qanuts.
Generalizations are lazy and usually incorrect.
Now she’s claiming she’s a true Independent
He says he represented him on Impeachment, I don’t know why that would disqualify him now.
christiefan915
Catalyst
^ This is what a person with no real convictions looks like.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Any lawyer who decides to represent trump needs to demand a huge retainer and not start working until the money's in the bank.
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
Especially self-important ghost-hunting intelligent designettes.
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
Taking a losing case though would definitely not be a feather in his legal cap.
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
It's always been said that, "Ignorance is no excuse, when it comes to breaking the law"! Well, in most cases that is true, but not in cases where intent does have to be proven, like in some of the charges filed against Trump.
We are stepping into a Twilight Zone now as Trump is the very first President to be tried for Felonious activities.
Trump really has no workable defense for some of the charges he will be facing, such as the showing of Classified Information to people who never had the FBI clearance to be viewing such Top Secret Military Classified Materials.
So, both the Prosecutors and the Defense team of Donald Trump will be using Trump's own recorded words in the trial. The Prosecutors will be using his words to say that these are admissions of guilt, and the Defense will be using Trump's words to try and prove that Trump was speaking out of ignorance of not understanding the laws surrounding them. Because that is what will decide the case, in the jury's minds. They will have to decide- Did he know better, or was he just being stupid, careless, and reckless for not knowing and fully understanding the law? And because Trump will have no other viable defense to defend himself other than pleading IGNORANCE- OR INSANITY. Trump will inevitably not even take credit for his ignorance because he will just claim that his attorney's mislead him. And all of the lawyers testimonies of them advising Trump of the laws, as written on the National Code books, will become "He said/She said testimonies unless they are documented and/or recorded on audio equipment capable of forensic evidence.
Just putting an unbiased jury together in Florida will be a suicide mission to begin with, because you cannot throw a rock in Florida with out hitting a Trumptard in the head- who still continues to eat the peanuts out of TRUMP'S every SHIT!
And who knows how a Trump appointed Trumptard Activist Judge, who is also a carded member of the Federalist Society, who actually helped Donald Trump in his campaign to be the president, is going to be allowed as evidence in this trial to begin with. We couldn't have done any worse, than selecting Giuliani to be the residing judge over this trial. THERE IS JUST NO WAY JUSTICE IS GOING TO PREVAIL IN A COURT OF LAW IN THE NOW CORRUPTED STATE OF FLORIDA!
So, here again we are facing a democracy crisis and a Kangaroo court already corrupted by Donald Trump's appointment of this corrupted activist judge in the first place.
GOOD LUCK LADY JUSTICE! GOOD LUCK AMERICA! GOOD LUCK DEMOCRACY! GOOD LUCK RULE OF LAW!!!!!!!!!
Last edited:
Into the Night
Verified User
Not crimes. You again ignore the Constitution of the United States and the PRA. A legal action is not a crime.
Into the Night
Verified User
You are describing yourself again. Inversion fallacy.
Into the Night
Verified User
The Constitution is real, dumbass. The PRA is real, dumbass. Jack Smith is a DEMOCRAT hack idiot.
