Israeli archaeologist ; No evidence to support Israelites. Old Testament is a myth.

JesusAI said:
perceptions of the learned people of the times?

do you always just kiss ass all the time?

"look it's a jew ass, I must kiss it" -- Captain zionist Douchey Mcsuckhole.
Click to expand...

Thanks for proving, again, why you make such a great patsy, Fredo. :thup:
 
Doc Dutch said:
Says who? An atheist?

3ZM4p1o.gif
Click to expand...

How many people has Satan killed in the Bible?
 
America said:
I'm a rationalist, but if I have to be fair, Satan is by far the lesser evil. Yahweh is a sadistic dictator and Satan just wanted to escape that heavenly North Korea.
Click to expand...

Warped view of 4000 year old desert nomad perceptions. You remind me of the Little Mermaid racists objecting to not making Ariel an Irish lass.
 
Doc Dutch said:
Prove it.

While I agree mankind's understanding of what is beyond the Natural Universe and mortal existence is very limited, I fail to see any evidence that "when you're dead, you're dead" like atheists believe.
Click to expand...

Is this a joke post?

The only evidence we have is that 'when you are dead, you're dead'.

Any other position is a belief.
 
QP! said:
Is this a joke post?

The only evidence we have is that 'when you are dead, you're dead'.

Any other position is a belief.
Click to expand...
No, but your emotional posts are not scientific, Kewpie.

Then why do the majority of humans, past and present, believe otherwise? What is your scientific evidence that they are 100% wrong? Or do you only believe they are wrong because you disagree that "an absence of evidence is evidence of absence"?

Agreed all such ideas are beliefs just like atheists are believers. The only logical reply is "I don't know", the agnostic POV.
 
Doc Dutch said:
No, but your emotional posts are not scientific, Kewpie.

Then why do the majority of humans, past and present, believe otherwise? What is your scientific evidence that they are 100% wrong? Or do you only believe they are wrong because you disagree that "an absence of evidence is evidence of absence"?

Agreed all such ideas are beliefs just like atheists are believers. The only logical reply is "I don't know", the agnostic POV.
Click to expand...

No emotion in my post, sorry.

"Majority of humans" is not a scientific standard, otherwise we have a real problem with all the conflicts between the Muslim religion and the Catholic religion because if 'beliefs' alone equal proof, they are both right in all their conflicting beliefs. I am talking about the disagreements in belief, not where they agree.

Also i don't need scientific evidence anything is 100% wrong. That is a stupid thing people who do not understand science say. "prove 100% Xeno and Scientology are not true..." "oh you cannot prove Xeno is not real. Then my science is as good as yours".


Again the above argument you are using is anti science stupidity that people who cannot support or prove their belief say.

The ONLY evidence we have on the topic of 'people who dead being dead", is to the affirmative. We can confirm they are dead by testing their bodies with science to affirm that.

The ONLY thing anyone can offer to counter that is a BELIEF, and not science.


I am agnostic with regards to a God, intelligent Aliens, Xeno, and the Spaghetti monster. We have no facts or evidence to prove any of them exist and if evidence ever presents and is proven i will accept it.

But that DOES not mean that is an equal position to the 'BELIEVERS' position. Just because Tom Cruise BELIEVES in Xeno, and has FAITH he exists, is, in no way equal to the agnostic position.

Religion is foundationless, outside 'belief' when it comes to a god like being. It is fairy tales, as unsupported as Lord of the Rings, belief in Sauren existing.

Death being final is supported.
 
QP! said:
No emotion in my post, sorry.....
Click to expand...
Disagreed as the remainder of your post proves.

QP! said:
..."Majority of humans" is not a scientific standard, otherwise we have a real problem with all the conflicts between the Muslim religion and the Catholic religion because if 'beliefs' alone equal proof, they are both right in all their conflicting beliefs. I am talking about the disagreements in belief, not where they agree.

Also i don't need scientific evidence anything is 100% wrong. That is a stupid thing people who do not understand science say. "prove 100% Xeno and Scientology are not true..." "oh you cannot prove Xeno is not real. Then my science is as good as yours".


Again the above argument you are using is anti science stupidity that people who cannot support or prove their belief say.

The ONLY evidence we have on the topic of 'people who dead being dead", is to the affirmative. We can confirm they are dead by testing their bodies with science to affirm that.

The ONLY thing anyone can offer to counter that is a BELIEF, and not science.


I am agnostic with regards to a God, intelligent Aliens, Xeno, and the Spaghetti monster. We have no facts or evidence to prove any of them exist and if evidence ever presents and is proven i will accept it.

But that DOES not mean that is an equal position to the 'BELIEVERS' position. Just because Tom Cruise BELIEVES in Xeno, and has FAITH he exists, is, in no way equal to the agnostic position.

Religion is foundationless, outside 'belief' when it comes to a god like being. It is fairy tales, as unsupported as Lord of the Rings, belief in Sauren existing.

Death being final is supported.
Click to expand...
Agreed on belief since anything beyond the physical, or "before" the Big Bang is all "belief".

Nice flip-flop from atheist to agnostic. You say one thing then post another.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top