Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Wow, Trump Dummy. You have the most severe case of TDS I've ever seen. You should see a doctor about that, old man.
Trump J/6 indictment document
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
You missed the news. An unnamed Trump supporter on the Internet found it unconstitutional.
3 or 4 guys on JPP found it unconstitutional. But I think it is all the same guy; so, you are right--an "unnamed Trump supporter."
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
You have the Hunter Biden Dik Pik syndrome you perverted bastard!
So don't preach to us about TDS!
Another painfully stupid post lacking any self-awareness. But hey, you are a Biden voter which explains your dishonesty and stupidity.
STRAWMAN. I don't think you can post without a strawman, a lie or looking like and outright dumbass.
More irony from a Biden voting dumbass.
Only a true dumbass like you thinks Democrats are winning.
evince
Truthmatters
Did you see the SIZE of the blur they had to do to cover all of Hunters package?
I think female republicans may start crossing the aisle more
Like father like son
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
TDS my ass! You have the Hunter Biden DIC PIC SYNDROME you perverted son-of-a-bitch!
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
You need help for your TDS, geezer. Get a VD check too because Pedo Don is dirty in more ways than one, old man.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Trump Dummy has the worst case of Trump Dick Sucking on JPP.
evince
Truthmatters
He just can’t get enough of what’s under that HB blur
When did Trump do all that? You're too dishonest and dumb to comprehend how stupid you look making such arguments.
When did Trump forge them? Oh, that's right, they weren't forged. There is no such thing as a "fake elector", unless you're a dumb uneducated Biden voter getting your news from MSNBC.
Again, if you read the indictment, which you obviously have not, the charges are an attack on the first amendment rights of ALL Americans including Trump. It PRESUMES there is a crime if a politician does not accept the outcome of an election, regardless of obvious inconsistencies. I guess we will have to indict Pelosi, Adam Schiff and Hillary Clinton next.
Unfortunately, Biden voters and dishonest hacks on the left think anything goes when it comes to Trump. But that is not how the law, or our Constitution works. You should read it sometime. You'd sound less ignorant and stupid.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
Your comments are nothing more than a LOUD WET-FART ON A CROWDED ELEVATOR!
evince
Truthmatters
He loves that blur
evince
Truthmatters
Your comments are nothing more than a LOUD WET-FART ON A CROWDED ELEVATOR![/QUOTE]
All fart no turds
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Let's hope his facility has a waterproof keyboard.
This is another dumb false media meme. They never had a chance to properly challenge the outcome. The same jurists that overturned their states election laws refused to even consider any challenges.
As for the protests, it wasn't an "attack" on the capitol. It wasn't an insurrection. It wasn't sparked by Trumps speech. Claiming it was makes you look dumb and dishonest.
When the vote tally is higher than the number of registered voters, it causes one with a scintilla of intelligence to question the results.
When more voters (154.6 million) turned out for the presidential election in 2020 than in 2016 (137.5 million), the largest increase between consecutive presidential elections since the inception of the CPS voting supplement in 1964, it causes one with a scintilla of intelligence to question the results.
When there were 168,300,000 registered voters and total votes cast in the 2020 election was 158,431,190, which suggests that NINETY-FOUR point ONE % of registered voters actually voted, a number unheard of American politics, it causes one with a scintilla of intelligence to question the results.
https://www.census.gov/content/dam/C...mo/p20-585.pdf
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/202...ident-results/
When you have jurists on the bench changing election law in the middle of an election for specious reasons, it causes one with a scintilla of intelligence to question the results.
When at 1:00 a.m. Trump has a million vote lead in PA, then by the end of the week thanks to jurists insisting to keep counting votes violating state laws, it causes one with a scintilla of intelligence to question the results.
When a dumb, senile old dunce who barely campaigned and couldn't fill an auditorium with supporters gets 17 million votes more than the much more popular Obama, it causes one with a scintilla of intelligence to question the results.
When a dumb, lying senile dunce gets 7,059,526 more votes than Trump, after Trump bettered his successful Presidential bid in 2016 by 11,239,147 votes, it causes one with a scintilla of intelligence to question the results.
Jonathan Turley is hardly an unnamed internet guy. Alan Dershowitz is hardly an unnamed internet guy. You're too brain dead to comprehend how stupid you look.