PA state CONSTITUTION bans no-excuse mail-in voting but 35% of 2020 vote was mail-in

[h=1]Pa. Supreme Court upholds no-excuse mail voting ahead of midterms[/h][h=2]by Stephen Caruso of Spotlight PA and Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA | Aug. 2, 2022[/h]

HARRISBURG — The state Supreme Court has upheld Pennsylvania’s mail ballot law, preserving for the time being a popular voting method that passed the legislature with bipartisan support but was later challenged by Republican elected officials.
In a 5-2 decision released Tuesday, the justices rejected the GOP argument that the legislature did not have the power under the state constitution to allow Pennsylvanians to vote by mail without an excuse.

Hey stupid. Judges have no more right to ignore the constitution than you or i do.
 
I'll say it again. The PA constitution bans no-excuse mail-in voting. Neither congress nor judges can override that. The dems had to amend the state constitution and they did not do that.
 
Fine.
The Republican legislature passed mail in voting the year before the election.
Unconstitutional.
With the trump virus raging,
Trump does not command or control any virus.
mail in voting was a great idea.
Unconstitutional.
Perhaps if trump hadn't instructed everyone to avoid mail voting and opt for same day voting, Biden's win would not have come so late in the counting process?
Biden didn't win.
He needed people to believe that mail voting is a scandal,
It is. It is unconstitutional.
or he couldn't perpetrate his terrorist acts on Jan. 6.
He didn't. DEMOCRATS DID.
He knew he was going to lose by a landslide.
He didn't. Trump has never lost an election.
 
[h=1]Pa. Supreme Court upholds no-excuse mail voting ahead of midterms[/h][h=2]by Stephen Caruso of Spotlight PA and Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA | Aug. 2, 2022[/h]

HARRISBURG — The state Supreme Court has upheld Pennsylvania’s mail ballot law, preserving for the time being a popular voting method that passed the legislature with bipartisan support but was later challenged by Republican elected officials.
In a 5-2 decision released Tuesday, the justices rejected the GOP argument that the legislature did not have the power under the state constitution to allow Pennsylvanians to vote by mail without an excuse.

Unconstitutional. No court has the authority to change any constitution.
 
Hey stupid. I used that article because it gave the pertinent quote from the state constitution.
You used that article because it said what you want it to say.

3 rogue judges ruled against mail in voting, but they were overturned immediately. Mail in voting is legal and accepted in Pa., as per the constitution.

Who's stupid now?
 
What is there to interpret?. The state constitution spells out clear as day that no-excuse mail-in voting is not allowed. THINK

LOL at a person so stupid they do not know that Constitutions are interpreted constantly, saying to someone else think.

So is it your position that the leanings of the SC Justices, whether Republican or Dem, do not matter as there is nothing to interpret? That rulings would not change whether it was all Justices that were more Progressive versus very conservative?

Honestly, be less stupid. Every Constitution is interpreted by the Justices and the leanings of those doing it matter. Roe V Wade and Gun rights, and Money in politics in Federal cases should have all educated you on this but obviously you were too stupid to understand that.
 
Back
Top