Trump J/6 indictment document

[martin]

Slick Willie. I should have said convict him on impeachment. Both Bill and Donnie were impeached, but neither was convicted....although, IMO, they both should have been.

Not a lawyer, but my understanding is that even an impeachment conviction doesn't mean someone is tossed out of office.

An "impeachment conviction" does mean being tossed out of office. It's what the Senate trial does or does not do. Unfortunately, in the Trump cases, especially the second when there were enough Republican senators who wanted never to see him in the WH again, the Senate failed to convict.

 

[Joe Capitalist]

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/01/politics/read-trump-january-6-indictment/index.html

Let’s read it

Why won't Republiclowns read the indictment? Are they afraid they will be proven wrong? They're not Patriots. They're cowards.

Just read the fucking indictment and STFU.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

An "impeachment conviction" does mean being tossed out of office. It's what the Senate trial does or does not do. Unfortunately, in the Trump cases, especially the second when there were enough Republican senators who wanted never to see him in the WH again, the Senate failed to convict.

Thanks. As stated previously, I believe both Presidents who were impeached should have been evicted from the White House.

 

[Into the Night]

He always needs an excuse because he isn't man enough to admit when he loses.

Trump has never lost an election.

 

[Into the Night]

They were not alternate electors. They were Republican electors who were not elected by the popular vote but submitted a phony certificate to the National Archives.

Faithless electors are perfectly legal unless the state requires the chosen electors to vote for the popular vote winner (which more states are doing).

Nobody submitted a phony certificate to the National Archives.
There is no such thing as a 'fake elector'.

No State has the authority to dictate how an elector will vote.

 

[Into the Night]

You mean which crimes. There are four:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...jan-6-indictment-2020-election-annotated.html

Paywall. Try again.

 

[Into the Night]

I'm sure you have no evidence of any rigging. We are still waiting for evidence for 2020.

The persecution of Trump is evidence, Blink.
I have already shown you evidence of election fraud by Democrats, Blink. RQAA. Stop mindlessly asking the same question over and over. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

it is unethical to pledge to abide by the wishes of the citizens of your state and than claim a constitutional right to not honor that promise. So again, the intent is exactly the same in both of these cases.

Had people like the Hamilton Electors movement succeeded, we would of certainly had a constitutional crisis on our hands.

It is not 'unethical'. No State has the authority to dictate how an elector can vote.

 

[zymurgy]

It is not 'unethical'. No State has the authority to dictate how an elector can vote.

it's unethical to make a promise and not follow that promise

 

[Into the Night]

So you clearly haven't read it. Rather than spew right-wing talking points, why not try looking at the actual indictment?

Already did. It's just more of the same persecution and lies.

 

[Into the Night]

Yet they failed to impeach him for it. Why?

He was impeached, Sock.

21st Century Republicans lie a lot. That doesn't mean I trust Democrats....especially when they call me a liar and/or a fool. LOL

You are a liar and a fool. That's why people say you are a liar and a fool, Sock.

 

[Into the Night]

Do you agree it's unethical to take an oath to defend and support the Constitution then seek to overthrow it by lies and violence?

Yes. This is why I support Trump and not Democrats or Biden.

 

[zymurgy]

Trump has never lost an election.

shut the fuck up retardo

 

[Into the Night]

The big difference is forging an electoral vote certification is illegal while being unethical is not.

Not possible. There is no such thing as a 'fake elector'.

The intent is not the same. In the first the electors are trying to switch the state's electoral votes to the losing candidate by deception.

No deception. They are free to vote as they wish.

In the second the elector is voting for who he thinks will be the best president not necessarily a member of either party.

It is the same. They are free to vote as they wish.

 

[Into the Night]

promising to do something but not doing it is deception.

No, it's simply breaking a promise. Nothing compels an elector to vote how he wishes.

 

[zymurgy]

It is not 'unethical'. No State has the authority to dictate how an elector can vote.

Ethics represents internal system of controls, and Law refers to an external mechanism of control

you are so far beneath me on these subjects it is laughable

 

[Into the Night]

But not illegal or forgery. All states do not require electors to vote for their parties' nominees so those electors are not doing anything deceptive or unethical.

No State has the authority to dictate how an elector will vote.

 

[zymurgy]

No, it's simply breaking a promise. Nothing compels an elector to vote how he wishes.

you are an idiot

deception is often legal, but it is still deception

last retarded word is yours., you are a fucking bore and argue like a 10 year old

 

[Into the Night]

Slick Willie. I should have said convict him on impeachment. Both Bill and Donnie were impeached, but neither was convicted....although, IMO, they both should have been.

Not a lawyer, but my understanding is that even an impeachment conviction doesn't mean someone is tossed out of office.

It means someone is tossed out of office, Sock.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Yes. This is why I support Trump and not Democrats or Biden.

Bulverism. Bigotry.

Bulverism fallacy. Bigotry.

Bulverism. Bigotry. False Authority.

bigotry, bulverism,