Trump J/6 indictment document

[Flash]

At this point I can only assume you are another sock of The Sock.

Only the States have authority to change the Constitution, Sock.

Wrong again.

Another example of your reading comprehension problem. Every amendment has been proposed by a 2/3 vote of Congress. The state legislatures ratified (with one exception). Therefore, none of our amendments have been added by just the states. They all involved proposal at the federal level.

Which amendment(s) were added by the states only?

 

[Flash]

The President is not elected by popular vote, Blink.

Non-sequitur

 

[Into the Night]

Wrong again.

I JUST posted the article and you claim it's WRONG??????!?

Another example of your reading comprehension problem. Every amendment has been proposed by a 2/3 vote of Congress.

That is not changing the Constitution, Sock.

The state legislatures ratified (with one exception).

THAT is changing the Constitution, Sock.

Therefore, none of our amendments have been added by just the states.

ALL of them are added by just the States, Sock.

They all involved proposal at the federal level.

Proposal is not changing the Constitution, Sock.

Which amendment(s) were added by the states only?

ALL of them, Sock.

 

[Into the Night]

Non-sequitur

Fallacy fallacy, Sock. You cannot get away with denying your own posts by posting random shit like this.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Fallacy fallacy, Sock. You cannot get away with denying your own posts by posting random shit like this.

Bulverism. Bigotry.

Bulverism fallacy. Bigotry.

Bulverism. Bigotry. False Authority.

bigotry, bulverism,

YALSA

YALSA

YALSA.

 

[Flash]

I JUST posted the article and you claim it's WRONG??????!?

That is not changing the Constitution, Sock.

THAT is changing the Constitution, Sock.

ALL of them are added by just the States, Sock.

Proposal is not changing the Constitution, Sock.

ALL of them, Sock.

You are half right. Ratification is changing the Constitution. But an amendment cannot be ratified until it is proposed. It cannot be proposed by the states only, it required federal action by Congress.

That is because any changes must be agreed to by both the federal and state governments. States never changed anything without federal action--it required equal action from both.

 

[Flash]

Fallacy fallacy, Sock. You cannot get away with denying your own posts by posting random shit like this.

You are denying my post. It clearly said Trump had never won the popular votes in an election--fact.

Your response was a non-sequitur. You said popular votes do not elect the presidency. That was an irrelevant response since I never said popular votes elected the president. I said Trump had never won the popular vote and pasted my exact post (#350).

Thus, your response was a non-sequitur to my original post. Go read post #350 carefully.

 

[Into the Night]

You are half right.

No. I am fully right.

Ratification is changing the Constitution.

Thus, States are the one ones that can change the Constitution.

But an amendment cannot be ratified until it is proposed. It cannot be proposed by the states only,

Yes it can. See Article V, which I recently posted here.

it required federal action by Congress.

It does not. See Article B, which I recently posted here.

That is because any changes must be agreed to by both the federal and state governments.

No it does not. It only needs agreement by the States.

States never changed anything without federal action--it required equal action from both.

It is not equal action. States can change anything in the Constitution WITHOUT ANY FEDERAL ACTION. They can even abolish it, and thus dissolve the federal government completely.

You insist on ignoring the Constitution AND the authority of the States over it. The federal government has NO authority over the Constitution. Only the States do.

 

[Into the Night]

You are denying my post. It clearly said Trump had never won the popular votes in an election--fact.

The President is not elected by popular vote.

Your response was a non-sequitur.

Fallacy fallacy.

You said popular votes do not elect the presidency.

No. I said the President is not elected by popular vote.

That was an irrelevant response since I never said popular votes elected the president.

Blatant lie.

I said Trump had never won the popular vote and pasted my exact post (#350).

The President is not elected by popular vote.

Thus, your response was a non-sequitur to my original post. Go read post #350 carefully.

Fallacy fallacy. Paradox. Irrational.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

No. I am fully right.

Bulverism. Bigotry.

Bulverism fallacy. Bigotry.

Bulverism. Bigotry. False Authority.

bigotry, bulverism,

 

[zymurgy]

Failure of reading comprehension. Did Trump win the popular vote in 2016 or 2020? No, so he has never won the popular vote in any election. Simple fact.

we don't have a competition for a popular vote

you can't win something that isn't being competed for

 

[Yakuda]

You mad BRO?

Sorry, but your comments were too stupid to reply to!

More likey you didnt understand them.

 

[Geeko Sportivo]

More likey you didnt understand them.

All, one needs to understand is that you are a despicable LYING SON-OF-A-BITCH!

I perfectly understand that, and so does everyone else!

 

[Flash]

The President is not elected by popular vote.

Fallacy fallacy.

No. I said the President is not elected by popular vote.

Blatant lie.

The President is not elected by popular vote.

Fallacy fallacy. Paradox. Irrational.

Non-sequitur

 

[Flash]

we don't have a competition for a popular vote

you can't win something that isn't being competed for

False. Candidates are competing to win a plurality of popular votes in each state. If they do not win the popular vote they cannot win that state's electoral votes.

Thus, to win the electoral votes in each state requires winning the state's popular votes; so, they are competing for popular votes to win a state's electoral votes.

Trump has never won the national popular vote in any election (2016 or 2020). He did win a majority of electoral votes in 2016. This shows us his level of support compared to his opponents.

 

[Yakuda]

False. Candidates are competing to win a plurality of popular votes in each state. If they do not win the popular vote they cannot win that state's electoral votes.

Thus, to win the electoral votes in each state requires winning the state's popular votes; so, they are competing for popular votes to win a state's electoral votes.

Trump has never won the national popular vote in any election (2016 or 2020). He did win a majority of electoral votes in 2016. This shows us his level of support compared to his opponents.

Every president has won the majority of electoral votes. That's how the president is elected.

 

[zymurgy]

False. Candidates are competing to win a plurality of popular votes in each state. If they do not win the popular vote they cannot win that state's electoral votes.

Thus, to win the electoral votes in each state requires winning the state's popular votes; so, they are competing for popular votes to win a state's electoral votes.

Trump has never won the national popular vote in any election (2016 or 2020). He did win a majority of electoral votes in 2016. This shows us his level of support compared to his opponents.

you and Into The Night deserve each other for being little shit stain liars in debates. You are clearly the opposite sides of a very shitty smelling coin.

You were obviously discussing a national popular vote which is not a competition to win or lose. Either that, our you are an idiot that thinks Trump didn't win any state elections.

Blatant lie. He lost 2020.

He has never won the popular vote in any election.

 

[Flash]

Every president has won the majority of electoral votes. That's how the president is elected.

Of course, but the discussion was about popular votes. I said Trump had never won the popular votes in any election---that is a completely separate fact than winning the electoral votes.

Actually, all presidents did not win a majority of electoral votes and the winner was chosen by the House. Thomas Jefferson, John Quincy Adams, Rutherford Hayes*.

 

[Flash]

you and Into The Night deserve each other for being little shit stain liars in debates. You are clearly the opposite sides of a very shitty smelling coin.

You were obviously discussing a national popular vote which is not a competition to win or lose. Either that, our you are an idiot that thinks Trump didn't win any state elections.

It is not a competition to win or lose, but it is a fact that Trump has never won the national popular vote in any election. That was my only point. Obviously Trump had to win the popular votes of states to win any electoral votes. I assume you enough that I did not have to explain that fact.

You cannot show any lies I have told. You just don't like the facts I state.

 

[zymurgy]

It is not a competition to win or lose, but it is a fact that Trump has never won the national popular vote in any election. That was my only point. Obviously Trump had to win the popular votes of states to win any electoral votes. I assume you enough that I did not have to explain that fact.

You cannot show any lies I have told. You just don't like the facts I state.

he has never tried to win a national popular vote. You lie every time you attach win or lose to a non competition - which is a fact