Federal judge halts Colorado gun law.....GOOD

[volsrock]

A federal Judge in Colorado blocked a gun control law that limits the sales of firearms to people 21 and older, holding that it ran afoul of recent Supreme Court precedent.

Phillip Brimmer, chief judge for the U.S. District of Colorado, ruled Monday in favor of a firearms advocacy group that sued in order to block the law known as Senate Bill 169. While the law took effect Monday, the judge blocked it from enforcement, ruling it fails the test established in the Supreme Court's 2022 decision Bruen v. New York Rifle & Pistol Association.


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...lorado-gun-control-law-citing-bruen-precedent

 

[NiftyNiblick]

I will guess that there are people on both sides who actually care about this.
That's as far as I'll go, however.
I won't try to guess why.

Why aren't people bitching about alcohol sales being restricted to people 21 years of age or older?

Is a 20 year old not worthy of having a glass of Chianti at his/her favorite pasta joint?

 

[volsrock]

I will guess that there are people on both sides who actually care about this.
That's as far as I'll go, however.
I won't try to guess why.

Why aren't people bitching about alcohol sales being restricted to people 21 years of age or older?

Is a 20 year old not worthy of having a glass of Chianti at his/her favorite pasta joint?

Is a a glass of Chianti a Constitutional right?

 

[NiftyNiblick]

Is a a glass of Chianti a Constitutional right?

Yes, in fact. See the 21st amendment, alleged constitution lover.

 

[Yakuda]

Yes, in fact. See the 21st amendment, alleged constitution lover.

The right to chianti shall not be infringed. I'm certain that's exactly what it says.

 

[volsrock]

Yes, in fact. See the 21st amendment, alleged constitution lover.

What is the 21 Amendment in simple terms?

The Twenty-first Amendment grants the States vir- tually complete control over whether to permit importation or sale of liquor and how to structure the liquor distribution system.

https://www.census.gov/history/pdf/21stamendment012019.pdf

Translation states can set their age limits etc

 

[Lionfish]

I will guess that there are people on both sides who actually care about this.
That's as far as I'll go, however.
I won't try to guess why.

Why aren't people bitching about alcohol sales being restricted to people 21 years of age or older?

Is a 20 year old not worthy of having a glass of Chianti at his/her favorite pasta joint?

Why do you care? People DO protest over the age to drink alcohol. BTW nobody cares about your glasses of Chianti. I thought you were a Bud Light drinker.

 

[Lionfish]

A federal Judge in Colorado blocked a gun control law that limits the sales of firearms to people 21 and older, holding that it ran afoul of recent Supreme Court precedent.

Phillip Brimmer, chief judge for the U.S. District of Colorado, ruled Monday in favor of a firearms advocacy group that sued in order to block the law known as Senate Bill 169. While the law took effect Monday, the judge blocked it from enforcement, ruling it fails the test established in the Supreme Court's 2022 decision Bruen v. New York Rifle & Pistol Association.


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...lorado-gun-control-law-citing-bruen-precedent

Good catch. Since the Bruen decision was announced, states that tried to thumb their nose at the SC and go around that decision has been to no avail. These cases are being argued in court and then reversed.
The Bruen decision will have far reaching effects on these rogue blue states that are trying to circumvent the law.

Hopefully, the suppressor laws will be loosened to the point where, like in most European countries, one can buy one off the shelf. Gunners can call them "hearing safety" devices.

 

[Earl]

The right to chianti shall not be infringed. I'm certain that's exactly what it says.

Nifty is near room temperature and rarely lucid.

 

[Yakuda]

Nifty is near room temperature and rarely lucid.

It fancies itself a genius though

 

[Earl]

It fancies itself a genius though

Indeed.

The Grim Reaper does not deal in self-aggrandizement though or especially false self-aggrandizement.

 

[archives]

A federal Judge in Colorado blocked a gun control law that limits the sales of firearms to people 21 and older, holding that it ran afoul of recent Supreme Court precedent.

Phillip Brimmer, chief judge for the U.S. District of Colorado, ruled Monday in favor of a firearms advocacy group that sued in order to block the law known as Senate Bill 169. While the law took effect Monday, the judge blocked it from enforcement, ruling it fails the test established in the Supreme Court's 2022 decision Bruen v. New York Rifle & Pistol Association.


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...lorado-gun-control-law-citing-bruen-precedent

More guns for the younger “well regulated militia,” why stop there, let’s make them legal at birth

Just shows how utterly stupid Thomas and Scalia’s decision was, in New York they had a case where the Judge was faced with deciding if guns should be allowed on public transport. He decided on local systems, no, cause there was a chance one would know everyone else on the bus/train, but longer routes, yes, they should be allowed. Appeals Court quickly threw the decision out

 

[archives]

The right to chianti shall not be infringed. I'm certain that's exactly what it says.

Nor is the Second Amendment exactly what you think it says

 

[Earl]

More guns for the younger “well regulated militia,” why stop there, let’s make them legal at birth

Just shows how utterly stupid Thomas and Scalia’s decision was, in New York they had a case where the Judge was faced with deciding if guns should be allowed on public transport. He decided on local systems, no, cause there was a chance one would know everyone else on the bus/train, but longer routes, yes, they should be allowed. Appeals Court quickly threw the decision out

The Founding Fathers assumed that the generations after theirs would have enough common sense to know that young children would be prohibited from gun ownership by their parents.

Poor Anchovies.

 

[volsrock]

More guns for the younger “well regulated militia,” why stop there, let’s make them legal at birth

Just shows how utterly stupid Thomas and Scalia’s decision was, in New York they had a case where the Judge was faced with deciding if guns should be allowed on public transport. He decided on local systems, no, cause there was a chance one would know everyone else on the bus/train, but longer routes, yes, they should be allowed. Appeals Court quickly threw the decision out

HOW BOUT WE RAISE THE ADULT AGE TO 21?

Are u for that?

 

[archives]

The Founding Fathers assumed that the generations after theirs would have enough common sense to know that young children would be prohibited from gun ownership by their parents.

Poor Anchovies.

What?

That is beyond funny, now the Founding Fathers were seers, fortune tellers, especially hysterical considering the Founding Fathers had little faith in the common man

 

[Yakuda]

Nor is the Second Amendment exactly what you think it says

It isn't about what I think it says it's about what it actually says. "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Oh yeah and the SC has continuously viewed it the same way. I'd give your post a C- not very original and you used a worn out argument.

I do like however that you dimwits found a "right" to abortion but you can't fathom the literal words found in the Constitution.

 

[volsrock]

What?

That is beyond funny, now the Founding Fathers were seers, fortune tellers, especially hysterical considering the Founding Fathers had little faith in the common man

Thats what the climate change nuts are....fortune tellers! And u believe everything they say as to what will happen in 20 yrs etc.. IF we dont do this

 

[Earl]

What?

That is beyond funny, now the Founding Fathers were seers, fortune tellers, especially hysterical considering the Founding Fathers had little faith in the common man

The Founding Fathers were clear thinkers and concerned about the future. The First and Second Amendments prove that, Anchovies.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

The Founding Fathers were clear thinkers and concerned about the future. The First and Second Amendments prove that, Anchovies.

This must be what they teach the special needs kids at Vanderbilt.