Is violence acceptable?

coldjoint said:
This is for aggregating publicly available items of evidence that would be admissible in court, not general election news stories or updates.
Wrong again, stupid.
Click to expand...

Who owns that site


It gave no information about election crimes idiot
 
evince said:
Thirty-five years after it was first imposed, a judge has lifted a consent decree barring the Republican National Committee from pursuing “ballot security” measures.

In their 1981 lawsuit to stop the RNC from engaging in certain practices at the polls, the Democratic National Committee attested that in a New Jersey gubernatorial election, the RNC had sent sample ballots to communities of color, and then had the names for each ballot returned as undeliverable removed from voter rolls. Democrats also alleged that the RNC hired off-duty cops to patrol majority-minority precincts, wearing “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands. These details were enough to secure a consent decree between the two party organizations and the court in 1982, stopping the GOP from engaging in such voter-intimidation practices.


Except, Democrats alleged, they didn’t stop. The consent decree was updated in 1987 after Republicans created a voter-challenge list of black voters from whom letters had been returned as undeliverable, with an RNC official saying that the list could “keep the black vote down considerably.” The decree was modified again in 1990 after a court ruled the RNC had violated it by not telling state parties about its provisions, which had led to the North Carolina GOP sending 150,000 postcards to potential voters listing voting regulations, in an apparent attempt at intimidation. The GOP violated the court order again in 2004 after yet another voter-challenge list targeted black voters.

With that history of behavior in full view, federal courts moved to allow the decree to expire in December 2017, a decision that was finalized Tuesday by a federal district court. For the first time in three decades, the RNC can pursue ballot-security measures without court preclearance.




The question is whether an unfettered RNC will return to the vote-challenging and poll-watching practices that were repeatedly found to be in violation of the Voting Rights Act. Even during the decades when the Republican National Committee was under court order, schemes like challenging voters with undeliverable mail, known as “voter caging,” have flourished. Similarly, states have pursued initiatives, like voter ID, to address the undocumented specter of widespread voter fraud. Yet, as the University of California, Irvine, School of Law professor Rick Hasen argued in November at Slate, it’s unlikely that the RNC itself will be directly challenging votes in the near future. The RNC had to prove it hadn’t recently violated the consent decree in order to be freed from it, and risks ending up right back under another court order in the future if it should change course.
Click to expand...

Three
 
It is arguable that the right culled themselves enough during covid to give swing States to Dems. That the margin of additional deaths in their ranks could have tipped the balance.

If they further want to cull themselves thru organized mass violence, i will not dissuade them. By all means march on the White House next time.


2024 is likely to be the last election close enough for the right to win in decades to come with the increase of votes coming from Young people. That is why we now see republi'cans' campaigning on raising the voting age and putting other restrictions on young voters.
 
Stone said:
EVERYBODY in here knows you for exactly what you are.

What I posted about you and your threats was exactly how it happened. What,...did you think I was the only one to see those posts before you so cowardly deleted them later?

Dont be so dumb. Lots of people did. Im not claiming to be some saint,....but regardless of what I am i know that I am one hell of a lot better than you when it comes to my character. Which isnt saying much,.. really.

One thing for sure,....as soon as this little " thing" is over with you today,...your ass is going on ignore where it belongs. Life is too short to suffer fools like YOU.
Click to expand...
Your bullshit may work with your brother's employees, but the only JPP members who buy it are Trumpian traitors, terrorists and criminals.

That's a lie, Fat Boy. People smarter than you, and that's just about everybody, son, knows that even if a poster deletes a post, they can't delete a quote. Are you saying you never quoted this alleged post? That you never reported a violent threat? Just how fucking stupid do you believe others are, Fat Boy? How stupid are you, son?

Fat Boy; your character is that of a bully, a liar and an oath-breaking racist. You support white nationalism, violent militias and a treasonous candidate for President.

Only dumbasses think bragging about putting me on ignore is a win. Fat Boy, you publicly claiming to put me on ignore is confessing to being a loser and a coward. It's a win for me, dumbass. It's especially sweet after your threats to assault me. LOL
 
Stone said:
Primarily true. There are still SOME left though thankfully.
Click to expand...

"Old school" Dems are still around, but few and far between. My GF comes from a family of "old school" Dems. They have so many conservative ideas (2nd. Amendment, stupid accusations of rape from 30 years ago, etc), yet still vote Dem. :dunno:
 
Libhater said:
The de-unification party was and still is the demorat party, and this de-unification started under the racist regime of obama and continues to divide America in every way imaginable under this current demrat administration. And the dem Christian hating, demoralizing our school children, this two-tiered injustice system, and constant race baiting by the dem rats is just adding to the divide of our nation.
Click to expand...

It didn't start under Obama, it started under Bill Clinton. That's when they told the the mainstream to get out of their party.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top