High expectations? States eye marijuana reform

Of course the left-Progressives would push for drugs to be legalized, then they figure they will have a stoned out nation of people they can just roll over and control..:cof1:

Have you ever eaten a pot laced brownie or smoked pot?
 
Of course an uneducated granny would not care her party supports the racist corparate reasons for prohibition. Yet you have no problem acting like republicans are always preaching freedom. LOFL

don't wonder why people call you conservatards.

humm, I didn't see the Clinton administration or this administration now pushing for legalizing drugs..so tell me about MY party again..:pke:
 
humm, I didn't see the Clinton administration or this administration now pushing for legalizing drugs..so tell me about MY party again..:pke:

your willfully ignorant, not at all surpising to me.

It will be legalized, your types underestimate the massive amout of racism keeping prohibition in place. also not surprising

Massive changes are under way, the majority of Americans are not for jailing people for something less harmful than beer. It will be legalized eventually, your party could take advantage of the votes but I suspect the 60 yr old fat white racist will continue to dictate how you think.
 
your willfully ignorant, not at all surpising to me.

It will be legalized, your types underestimate the massive amout of racism keeping prohibition in place. also not surprising

Massive changes are under way, the majority of Americans are not for jailing people for something less harmful than beer. It will be legalized eventually, your party could take advantage of the votes but I suspect the 60 yr old fat white racist will continue to dictate how you think.

good grief, do you have anything more important to you than POT..
and you will not be DICTATED to, yet you all can dictate abortion, drugs, sex, and whatever unhealthy, immoral garbage on others..GROW UP
 
good grief, do you have anything more important to you than POT..
and you will not be DICTATED to, yet you all can dictate abortion, drugs, sex, and whatever unhealthy, immoral garbage on others..GROW UP

granny trailer trash, I do not dictate you have an abortion though the world would be a better place had you mom had one.
And I certainly don't need some uneducated granny telling me shit about morals when you shit on the bibles
genisis 1:29
 
granny trailer trash, I do not dictate you have an abortion though the world would be a better place had you mom had one.
And I certainly don't need some uneducated granny telling me shit about morals when you shit on the bibles
genisis 1:29

hahaha, you people are a laugh riot today.
your alls true colors are showing through..:good4u:
 
http://www.interestingfacts.org/fact/george-washington-facts


George Washington Facts

On February 22, 1732 George Washington was born. George Washington was the only of all Founding Fathers to free his slaves. Marijuana was the primary crop grown by George Washington at Mount Vernon. He was the first Mason to serve as president. Washington rejected a movement among army officers to make him king of the United States. Washington is the only president who was elected unanimously.
 
interesting, I posted something a while back with the other founding fathers smoking marijuana. Nice to see Washington was cool too.
These racist will either open thier eyes or continue to whine as the world changes around them.
I tried to rep you but it's too soon. thanks
 
I'm never afraid to say I was wrong.
I've learned a bunch from democrats on this site.

Learning one of our greatest leaders grew pot is one of the better things.

Que racist prohibitionist
 
Once enough of the states make these laws then the pres and congress will end the stupidity of this part of the drug war.

Then you will see more people invibing THC than alcohol.

The country will be a better place for it.

when did the feds care about what the states want?
1) drinking age
2) tobacco age
3) seatbelt laws
4) speed limits
5) mandatory health care


Face it, the ONLY way you'll guarantee no criminal prosecutions is by forcing the supreme courts hand to reduce the power of the commerce clause and the necessary and proper clause.
 
Akmal Shaikh, a British national who was convicted of smuggling drugs into China, was executed by lethal injection on Tuesday in Urumqi after approval from China's Supreme People's Court (SPC).

The SPC said Tuesday that it had reviewed and approved the death sentence against Akmal Shaikh.

Shaikh, 53, male, was caught carrying up to 4,030 grams of heroin at the international airport of Urumqi in northwest China's Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous from Dushanbe, capital of Tajikstan, on the morning of September 12, 2007.

Shaikh was sentenced to death in the first instance by the Intermediate People's Court of Urumqi on October 29, 2008 and his final verdict came in October after two failed appeals.

The SPC said in a statement that Shaikh had broken China's Criminal Law by smuggling huge amounts of heroin, and "the evidence was certain and the facts were clear."

His behavior constituted the crime of drug smuggling and the crime committed was extremely serious, the SPC said.

It said the sentence handed down by the Intermediate People's Court of Urumqi in accordance with Article 48 and 347 of China's Criminal Law was appropriate.

China's Criminal Law stipulates that people trafficking more than 50 grams of heroin are punishable by death.

Crimes concerning drugs had been universally recognized as serious criminal offences and had a severe negative social impact, said the SPC statement, adding the general public, in China and other countries, demanded severe punishment for such crimes.

China's Criminal Law stipulates that everyone was equal before the law and no one was permitted to transgress the law.

Criminals should all be punished according to law regardless of their nationality, SPC said.

Although China retained death penalty, it had exercised strict control over capital punishment, said the statement.

The application of death penalty for drug smugglers who caused serious social consequences would serve to deter criminals and prevent drug-related crimes, it said.

The SPC also said that the defendant's litigation rights and legitimate treatment had been fully granted in custody and trial.

Officials from the British embassy in China and a British organization had proposed a mental disease examination on Akmal Shaikh, but the documents they provided could not prove he had mental disorder nor did members of his family have history of mental disease, the SPC said.

Akmal Shaikh himself did not provide relevant materials regarding him having a mental disease, according to the SPC.

"There is no reason to cast doubt on Akmal Shaikh's mental status," the SPC said.
 
Back
Top