An early test for Georgia prosecutors: Trump’s likely bid to take the case to federal

zymurgy said:
the acts have to be considered a part of duties as the executive branch

Meadows and other "co-conspirators" will have a much easier argument as all he has to argue is he was doing the bidding of his boss
Click to expand...

That's not what the law states.

(1)The United States or any agency thereof or any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States or of any agency thereof, in an official or individual capacity, for or relating to any act under color of such office or on account of any right, title or authority claimed under any Act of Congress for the apprehension or punishment of criminals or the collection of the revenue.
Click to expand...

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1442
 
floridafan said:
is that supposed to mean something?
Click to expand...

you are just the typical left wing idiot pretending to know how cases will go, than you shrink back with all the other cockroaches when the lights come on


see the Kyle Rittenhouse case as an example. This is not my first rodeo watching you clowns pretend things are in the bag

my post means that the decisions will not be made by liberal cronies at the state level. Even a barely functioning retard could interpret the meaning
 
zymurgy said:
you are just the typical left wing idiot pretending to know how cases will go, than you shrink back with all the other cockroaches when the lights come on


see the Kyle Rittenhouse case as an example. This is not my first rodeo watching you clowns pretend things are in the bag
Click to expand...

Once again I must ask why is a federal judge so important?
 
signalmankenneth said:
He’s virtually certain to try to transfer the case in hopes of a friendlier jury pool and the chance to draw one of his own judges.
Click to expand...


As opposed to leaving it in a Democratic controlled jury that voted 85% against Trump? Yeah, idiots on the left would think that is fair.

However, the best reason this should be moved to the Federal courts is that the actions of a sitting President and a Federal election are not a State's jurisdiction. Fanni, being an unqualified, low IQ, partisan hack moron on steroids, doesn't get that FACT.
 
zymurgy said:
the acts have to be considered a part of duties as the executive branch

Meadows and other "co-conspirators" will have a much easier argument as all he has to argue is he was doing the bidding of his boss
Click to expand...

So if his boss told Meadows to shoot someone, he would not be responsible, as he was doing the bidding of his boss?
 
archives said:
The rationale they are employing is that whatever Trump did he was acting from the Office of the Presidency, therefore, it should be in Federal Court not a State Court.

Meadows is the one testing the waters, claiming as the Chief of Staff he was the go between in the Georgia phone call, set it up, that he was working for the President at that moment. If he succeeds, and could depending on the Judge, the others will follow suit
Click to expand...

These moronic and ludicrous charges are when he was President. Therefore, it is not a state's jurisdiction. It's moronic of the Georgia DA mental case to think it is.
 
archives said:
The rationale they are employing is that whatever Trump did he was acting from the Office of the Presidency, therefore, it should be in Federal Court not a State Court.
Click to expand...

Which is true!

It was also a FEDERAL election for federal a office

Giving false information when registering to vote
Voting when ineligible to vote
Voting more than once or using someone else’s name to vote



all 3 are federal offenses ..but what trump is accused of is not?
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
As far as the motion, Trump already lost that in the NY case, and I am not sure, but if I had to bet, I think he will lose it again.
He desperately does not want this case Televised.

On the pardon, Its more complicated than that, the board of Republicans has criteria they must consider.
Click to expand...

The NY case was not about election interference while Trump was President. Very different matter. The Georgia case is a farce and should be moved to a Federal court. The Federal judge can then rule the case is a farce on its merits and dismiss it in its entirety.

The Democratic Party has gone full retard on Trump.
 
Truth Detector said:
The NY case was not about election interference while Trump was President. Very different matter. The Georgia case is a farce and should be moved to a Federal court. The Federal judge can then rule the case is a farce on its merits and dismiss it in its entirety.

The Democratic Party has gone full retard on Trump.
Click to expand...

You dont even know what the Georgia case is about. Try reading the indictment first, handjob.
 
floridafan said:
So if his boss told Meadows to shoot someone, he would not be responsible, as he was doing the bidding of his boss?
Click to expand...

your analogy is sophomoric

but yes, if the leader of the executive branch told his subordinate to use say a drone to take out a civilian, that would quality

so Obama can sleep peacefully
 
zymurgy said:
your analogy is sophomoric

but yes, if the leader of the executive branch told his subordinate to use say a drone to take out a civilian, that would quality

so Obama can sleep peacefully
Click to expand...

Is that the same as attempting to steal a presidential election. If you are told to do something illegal, you are responsible if you do it.
 
floridafan said:
Is that the same as attempting to steal a presidential election. If you are told to do something illegal, you are responsible if you do it.
Click to expand...

watching shit stains pretend to understand the law cracks me up.

Did you post about Rittenhouse here? Should I go look?
 
floridafan said:
If the indictment covered presidential duties, it could be moved to Federal court, however, an attempt to steal an election is not considered a regular part of presidential duties, so the case will remain in state court.
Click to expand...

So when you said, "Trump has no chance of moving the trial to Federal court. None." that was just you mouthing off? That's what I guessed but the confirmation is nice.
 
signalmankenneth said:
F3febYqW4AAei9K.jpg
Click to expand...

I actually remember entertainment consoles like that.
Everything in one neat box.
Nothing great about either the picture or the sound, but we didn't know any better.

Now even my matrix input switcher is a separate box.
 
floridafan said:
If the indictment covered presidential duties, it could be moved to Federal court, however, an attempt to steal an election is not considered a regular part of presidential duties, so the case will remain in state court.
Click to expand...



Of course its not part of a Presidents regular duties ,what crime would be? My God! are u this fucking stupid
 
Helping trump win an election is not in the duties of helping the trump administration perform the job of the presidency



It was a campaign act you Russian shit bags


Not to mention it was an illegal act
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top