Truly innocent?

D

domer76

Verified User
Now, just think about it for one second.

If one believed, or knew, they were truly innocent, completely innocent and easily provable, wouldn’t you push for a trial as soon as possible rather than try to string it out?

After all, don’t we expect proof on this MONDAY of massive fraud? That’s what was promised.
 
Here's the thing: The MAGA GOP have been doing a yo-yo in their squawking about time tables for trials.

If it's advantageous (or so they think) to their political agenda, they'll scream for either.....sheer hypocrisy be damned.

In short, these clowns have no shame. Just look at the You Tube coverage of all the "hearings" lead by Jordan and Comer. Pathetic.
 
domer76 said:
Now, just think about it for one second.

If one believed, or knew, they were truly innocent, completely innocent and easily provable, wouldn’t you push for a trial as soon as possible rather than try to string it out?

After all, don’t we expect proof on this MONDAY of massive fraud? That’s what was promised.
Click to expand...

No, you would expect to gather the evidence and organize your arguments so that you have the best chance of proving your case.

You don't put a time limit on it.

Trump is now having to prepare for four trials, it's going to take his legal team a very long time to get prepared.

Maybe they shouldn't have filed so many charges against him.
 
domer76 said:
Now, just think about it for one second.

If one believed, or knew, they were truly innocent, completely innocent and easily provable, wouldn’t you push for a trial as soon as possible rather than try to string it out?

After all, don’t we expect proof on this MONDAY of massive fraud? That’s what was promised.
Click to expand...

Because they're guilty and delaying the trial as long as possible gives them time to plot with their supporters to do stuff like the 1/6 attack. The trumptards have already doxxed the grand jurors in the GA case.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
No, you would expect to gather the evidence and organize your arguments so that you have the best chance of proving your case.

You don't put a time limit on it.

Trump is now having to prepare for four trials, it's going to take his legal team a very long time to get prepared.

Maybe they shouldn't have filed so many charges against him.
Click to expand...

Trump tells us he’ll have all the evidence on Monday. He also claims his innocence is obvious and easily provable.

So, the evidence is already gathered according to the stable genius.
 
domer76 said:
Now, just think about it for one second.

If one believed, or knew, they were truly innocent, completely innocent and easily provable, wouldn’t you push for a trial as soon as possible rather than try to string it out?

After all, don’t we expect proof on this MONDAY of massive fraud? That’s what was promised.
Click to expand...

Prosecutors could push for a trial as soon as possible but that wouldn't put it in primary season would it? STFU
 
domer76 said:
Now, just think about it for one second.

If one believed, or knew, they were truly innocent, completely innocent and easily provable, wouldn’t you push for a trial as soon as possible rather than try to string it out?

After all, don’t we expect proof on this MONDAY of massive fraud? That’s what was promised.
Click to expand...

MAGAs have been spoon fed talking points that the judicial system is intentionally rigged against them and can't be trusted


But the simple fact is Republican presidential administrations just tend to be much more criminal than Democratic administrations -->

Cypress said:
So in the last five Democratic Presidential administrations there were seven indictments and three convictions.

While in the last five Republican administrations there were 126 indictments and 112 convictions.
Click to expand...
 
Cypress said:
MAGAs have been spoon fed talking points that the judicial system is intentionally rigged against them and can't be trusted


But the simple fact is Republican presidential administrations just tend to be much more criminal than Democratic administrations -->
Click to expand...

They’ve been spoon fed that ALL our institutions are corrupt. FBI, CDC, DOJ, EPA, election system, on and on.

Institutions are the glue that holds our country together. Without that trust, we see things fall apart, just as we are now.

More than anything else, that’s the damage Trump has done and it will take a LONG time, and the right president, to begin to repair that.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
No, you would expect to gather the evidence and organize your arguments so that you have the best chance of proving your case.

You don't put a time limit on it.

Trump is now having to prepare for four trials, it's going to take his legal team a very long time to get prepared.

Maybe they shouldn't have filed so many charges against him.
Click to expand...

I would hope his lawyers know about delegating. Every day law firms handle dozens of different cases and still manage to make their trial dates. The problem with trump's cases is trump himself. His lawyers should be paid double for trying to finesse his lies into a credible case.
 
Anyone who at this late date could possibly think Trump isn't guilty of numerous crimes. Should not be allowed to breed! They are brain dead!
 
christiefan915 said:
I would hope his lawyers know about delegating. Every day law firms handle dozens of different cases and still manage to make their trial dates. The problem with trump's cases is trump himself. His lawyers should be paid double for trying to finesse his lies into a credible case.
Click to expand...

There's a running theme about all the lawyers and legal folk the Orange Oaf has surrounded himself with; either they are not too bright, they realize they're on a sinking ship and jump (but don't get paid), or they get dumped when they actually tell the Orange Oaf the truth, and then he throws them under the bus when indicted for crimes committed on his behalf.

This is why I find Christie's bid for the nomination a joke, and while Barr's analysis is pure hypocrisy....they both aided and abetted this criminal.
 
domer76 said:
Now, just think about it for one second.

If one believed, or knew, they were truly innocent, completely innocent and easily provable, wouldn’t you push for a trial as soon as possible rather than try to string it out?

After all, don’t we expect proof on this MONDAY of massive fraud? That’s what was promised.
Click to expand...

you've had the proof the election was unconstitutinal for two years and still ignore it.......
 
domer76 said:
Now, just think about it for one second.

If one believed, or knew, they were truly innocent, completely innocent and easily provable, wouldn’t you push for a trial as soon as possible rather than try to string it out?

After all, don’t we expect proof on this MONDAY of massive fraud? That’s what was promised.
Click to expand...

An innocent person wants to clear their name ASAP.

Guilty people delay, delay, delay
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top