Manufactured Climate Consensus Deemed False By Climate Scientist

Grokmaster

Well-known member
Contributor
Any person capable of linear thought reached this conclusion years ago, when the falsified data and government bribery started being revealed.



Manufactured Climate Consensus Deemed False By Climate Scientist - 'The Time For Debate Has Ended'


Is there really a man-made global warming crisis? Although the urgency surrounding hundreds of international environment conferences could make such a question seem ridiculous, some leading scientists warn that the global warming panic is all a big scam.

For many years, the world seemed to have reached a climate consensus about the growing threat to the environment. With the support of an overwhelming majority of world-renowned scientists, various treaties have been borne.

The United Nations is leading the charge with this climate consensus, and its core message has been pretty clear. The environment is under human threat, and we have to "act now!"

But is that really true? Some top-level scientists have come out to refute these claims. One of them is Dr. John Clauser, a renowned physicist and Nobel Prize winner. He vehemently opposes the notion of a man-made climate crisis. In fact, he believes it's all a deliberate hoax.
The Nobel Laureate is strongly joined by the founder of the Weather Channel, John Coleman. The now-late veteran weatherman who has spent most of his life analyzing weather changes has something interesting to say. “Climate change is not happening; there is no significant man-made global warming now, there hasn’t been any in the past, and there is no reason to expect any in the future,” he declared.

~ Just recently, another leading dissident voice joined the party. American climatologist Judith Curry is making her doubts known loud and clear. In over a hundred scientific papers, the Georgia Institute of Technology professor emerita has described the consensus as "manufactured." According to her, "the time for debate has ended."

She also had scathing criticisms of her colleagues in the science world. She has accused other scientists of deceptively fuelling the man-made climate emergency for "fame and fortune."

Professor Curry has also bravely opened a can of worms concerning the science world. She has exposed what she described as a "climate change industry" where scientists have become puppets of politicians and moneybags.




https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...eb32c1e66a04ba5a16524b05abde747&ei=27#image=1
 
Bullshit, a retired physicist, not a climate scientist, one who has never published any peer review material regarding climate science, plus a weatherman who started the weather channel, and who by the way died five years ago, and a known climate denier who recently had to reveal she is funded by energy companies, now supposedly has proof that man made climate change is a hoax

How gullible are flat earthers?

It is always the same shit, they find some obscure nobody somewhere, usually one with zero experience in climate science, and promote his or her “study/claims” as “proof” man made climate change isn’t happening. All part of creating a false paradigm, one usually either funded and propagandized by big oil, and the lemmings swallow it whole

And please, no idiocy about how temperatures can be measured
 
The guy's not wrong. The whole Gorebal Warming / anthropogenic climate change thing is a scam. The 'true believers' are increasingly becoming the flat earthers of our era. Sure, the climate changes. But it isn't human activity that is driving that change. At best, human activity is a tiny fraction of the causes. That's the problem. The Gorebal Warming bunch are making Mount Everest out of an anthill.
 
The guy's not wrong. The whole Gorebal Warming / anthropogenic climate change thing is a scam. The 'true believers' are increasingly becoming the flat earthers of our era. Sure, the climate changes. But it isn't human activity that is driving that change. At best, human activity is a tiny fraction of the causes. That's the problem. The Gorebal Warming bunch are making Mount Everest out of an anthill.

Wait a minute, “this guy’s not wrong?”

Are you aware the guy offered zero proof for his complaint, he ain’t a climate scientist, and he was speaking to an energy conference in South Korea? The weatherman who supposedly concurred has been dead for five years, and the women cited is totally funded by energy interests

So exactly how is this guy correct?

As I said, hard to believe anyone could be as gullible as the MAGA militia, if you telling them anything they want to hear, regardless of validity, or lacking any evidence, they eagerly believe it
 
Bullshit, a retired physicist, not a climate scientist, one who has never published any peer review material regarding climate science, plus a weatherman who started the weather channel, and who by the way died five years ago, and a known climate denier who recently had to reveal she is funded by energy companies, now supposedly has proof that man made climate change is a hoax

How gullible are flat earthers?

It is always the same shit, they find some obscure nobody somewhere, usually one with zero experience in climate science, and promote his or her “study/claims” as “proof” man made climate change isn’t happening. All part of creating a false paradigm, one usually either funded and propagandized by big oil, and the lemmings swallow it whole

And please, no idiocy about how temperatures can be measured

There is no such thing as a climate scientist.

They are all scientists in traditional fields that self label that’s a climate scientist.

There are no Doctorates you can get from any university in climate science.

This is another hoax the left sucks up without question.
 
As I said, hard to believe anyone could be as gullible as the MAGA militia, if you telling them anything they want to hear, regardless of validity, or lacking any evidence, they eagerly believe it

The socialist authoritarian SHUTDOWN of the entire GLOBAL ECONOMY had ZERO effect on the growth of atmospheric CO2.
 
There is no such thing as a climate scientist.

They are all scientists in traditional fields that self label that’s a climate scientist.

There are no Doctorates you can get from any university in climate science.

This is another hoax the left sucks up without question.

MIT:

Bachelor of Science in Climate System Science and Engineering
https://climate-major.mit.edu/

Climate Science Minor
https://guide.berkeley.edu/undergraduate/degree-programs/climate-science/

It's a lot like "Womyn's Studies" or "Political Science..." You know, mostly made up and more a liberal art than science...
 
Wait a minute, “this guy’s not wrong?”

Are you aware the guy offered zero proof for his complaint, he ain’t a climate scientist, and he was speaking to an energy conference in South Korea? The weatherman who supposedly concurred has been dead for five years, and the women cited is totally funded by energy interests

So exactly how is this guy correct?

As I said, hard to believe anyone could be as gullible as the MAGA militia, if you telling them anything they want to hear, regardless of validity, or lacking any evidence, they eagerly believe it

Largely irrelevant appeal to authority.
 
Any person capable of linear thought reached this conclusion years ago, when the falsified data and government bribery started being revealed.



Manufactured Climate Consensus Deemed False By Climate Scientist - 'The Time For Debate Has Ended'


Is there really a man-made global warming crisis? Although the urgency surrounding hundreds of international environment conferences could make such a question seem ridiculous, some leading scientists warn that the global warming panic is all a big scam.

For many years, the world seemed to have reached a climate consensus about the growing threat to the environment. With the support of an overwhelming majority of world-renowned scientists, various treaties have been borne.

The United Nations is leading the charge with this climate consensus, and its core message has been pretty clear. The environment is under human threat, and we have to "act now!"

But is that really true? Some top-level scientists have come out to refute these claims. One of them is Dr. John Clauser, a renowned physicist and Nobel Prize winner. He vehemently opposes the notion of a man-made climate crisis. In fact, he believes it's all a deliberate hoax.
The Nobel Laureate is strongly joined by the founder of the Weather Channel, John Coleman. The now-late veteran weatherman who has spent most of his life analyzing weather changes has something interesting to say. “Climate change is not happening; there is no significant man-made global warming now, there hasn’t been any in the past, and there is no reason to expect any in the future,” he declared.

~ Just recently, another leading dissident voice joined the party. American climatologist Judith Curry is making her doubts known loud and clear. In over a hundred scientific papers, the Georgia Institute of Technology professor emerita has described the consensus as "manufactured." According to her, "the time for debate has ended."

She also had scathing criticisms of her colleagues in the science world. She has accused other scientists of deceptively fuelling the man-made climate emergency for "fame and fortune."

Professor Curry has also bravely opened a can of worms concerning the science world. She has exposed what she described as a "climate change industry" where scientists have become puppets of politicians and moneybags.




https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...eb32c1e66a04ba5a16524b05abde747&ei=27#image=1

Here’s a quote from Curry:

“The basic facts of the situation are pretty clear. Global temperatures have been warming. Humans emit CO2 into the atmosphere. CO2 has an infrared emission spectra which overall acts to warm the planet.”

She also made a simplistic statement thst people can simply move as sea levels rise.

What she is denying is that the political response is manufactured. That an immediate turn to wind and solar is a mistake. Well, no shit, sherlock. The infrastructure for those renewables is not there yet. So, let’s not do anything and just have people move.
 
There is no such thing as a climate scientist.

They are all scientists in traditional fields that self label that’s a climate scientist.

There are no Doctorates you can get from any university in climate science.

This is another hoax the left sucks up without question.

Yet, you rely on climate “experts” who are the dissidents for your information. LOL

You can’t make this shit up, folks!
 
Bullshit, a retired physicist, not a climate scientist, one who has never published any peer review material regarding climate science, plus a weatherman who started the weather channel, and who by the way died five years ago, and a known climate denier who recently had to reveal she is funded by energy companies, now supposedly has proof that man made climate change is a hoax

How gullible are flat earthers?

It is always the same shit, they find some obscure nobody somewhere, usually one with zero experience in climate science, and promote his or her “study/claims” as “proof” man made climate change isn’t happening. All part of creating a false paradigm, one usually either funded and propagandized by big oil, and the lemmings swallow it whole

And please, no idiocy about how temperatures can be measured

Because in Ingnorama World, physics and climate are not very closely related, especially atmospheric conditions.

"The physics of climate change. Weather and climate are driven by the absorption of solar radiation and the subsequent re-distribution of that energy through radiative, advective, and hydrological processes."

https://www.aps.org/policy/reports/...hange,, advective, and hydrological processes.

The longtime head of the IPCC is not a " climate scientist".

What an imbecile you are
 

Absorption of IR by greenhouse gases is something one learns in freshman college chemistry or before. Because he is a Nobel laureate in quantum mechanics is meaningless.

I read his stuff. Interesting. He goes on and on (and on and on) about good science and how it seeks the truth. Then, know what he states?

“I BELIEVE there is no climate crisis.”

So, it’s nothing more than his BELIEF. Nothing I saw from him backed it up with any scientific proof or data. Just bashing the IPCC.
 
Bullshit, a retired physicist, not a climate scientist, one who has never published any peer review material regarding climate science, plus a weatherman who started the weather channel, and who by the way died five years ago, and a known climate denier who recently had to reveal she is funded by energy companies, now supposedly has proof that man made climate change is a hoax

How gullible are flat earthers?

It is always the same shit, they find some obscure nobody somewhere, usually one with zero experience in climate science, and promote his or her “study/claims” as “proof” man made climate change isn’t happening. All part of creating a false paradigm, one usually either funded and propagandized by big oil, and the lemmings swallow it whole

And please, no idiocy about how temperatures can be measured

You're truly an imbecile, Judith Curry is no climate denier but she is definitely a sceptic as any scientist worth their salt ought to be. Here is just one paper that she co-authored with Nic Lewis and published in the prestigious American Meteorological Society journal. As for the rest, it's your usual old bollox.

The Impact of Recent Forcing and Ocean Heat Uptake Data on Estimates of Climate Sensitivity
Nicholas Lewis and Judith Curry

Print Publication: 01 Aug 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0667.1
Page(s): 6051–6071

https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/31/15/jcli-d-17-0667.1.xml
 
Absorption of IR by greenhouse gases is something one learns in freshman college chemistry or before. Because he is a Nobel laureate in quantum mechanics is meaningless.

I read his stuff. Interesting. He goes on and on (and on and on) about good science and how it seeks the truth. Then, know what he states?

“I BELIEVE there is no climate crisis.”

So, it’s nothing more than his BELIEF. Nothing I saw from him backed it up with any scientific proof or data. Just bashing the IPCC.

The IPCC should be bashed it's a political organisation first and foremost.
 
Back
Top