House GOP to present evidence against Biden in first impeachment hearing

ExpressLane

Verified User
House GOP to present evidence against Biden in first impeachment hearing
First hearing out of impeachment inquiry against Biden begins Thursday at 10 am

House Republicans on Thursday morning are set to hold their first impeachment inquiry public hearing, where they will present all evidence uncovered to date as part of their investigation into the Biden family’s business dealings while examining "the value" of the inquiry.


The House Oversight Committee, led by Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., will "examine the value of an impeachment inquiry and present evidence House Republicans have uncovered to date regarding President Joe Biden's knowledge of and role in his family's domestic and international business practices," according to the panel. The hearing is to begin at 10 a.m.

Bruce Dubinsky, a forensic accountant with decades of experience in financial investigations and consulting – and who the committee says has testified in more than 80 trials, including trials that involved financial fraud – will testify, along with former Assistant Attorney General Eileen O'Connor, who served in the Department of Justice Tax Division.

Law professor and Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley, who testified in the Clinton and Trump impeachments, will also testify.

The House Oversight and Accountability Committee has uncovered a mountain of evidence revealing how Joe Biden abused his public office for his family’s financial gain," Comer is expected to say in his opening statement. "For years, President Biden has lied to the American people about his knowledge of and participation in his family’s corrupt business schemes."

"Evidence reveals that then-Vice President Joe Biden spoke, dined, and developed relationships with his family’s foreign business targets. These business targets include foreign oligarchs who sent millions of dollars to his family," Comer is expected to say. "It also includes a Chinese national who wired a quarter of a million dollars to his son."

Comer was referring to subpoenaed Hunter Biden financial records, which revealed he received two wires originating from Beijing and linked to BHR Partners in 2019.
Fox News Digital first reported that Hunter Biden received the wire payments, which originated in Beijing, for more than $250,000 from Chinese business partners during the summer of 2019 — wires that listed the Delaware home of Joe Biden as the beneficiary address for the funds.

The White House declined to comment.

"To date, the House Oversight Committee has uncovered how the Bidens and their associates created over 20 shell companies and raked in over $24 million dollars," Comer will say, adding that the committee has also "identified nine members of the Biden family who have participated in or benefited from these business schemes."

"What were the Bidens selling to make all this money? Joe Biden himself," Comer will say. "The American people demand accountability for this culture of corruption." .....This should


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ho...esent-evidence-against-biden-in-first-hearing
================================
This is must see TV set your DVR . I have been asking liberals for months now what Service or Products are the Biden family selling that is worth 10s of millions of dollars. I know democrats will say there is no evidence. Criminals tend to try to hide their crimes. Slow Joe Bribem isn't very smart but he is or was smart enough to try to hide his bribery. But like most criminals he has lived beyond his means. Hunter said in a text the Biden family has only one asset. We all know who that one asset is. That one asset sprung into action with quid pro quo for Mykola Zlochevsky to save Burisma from investigation by Shokin. To the liberals here that parrot "there is no evidence" you need to watch this investigation today. We convict people for murder so we can impeach Joke Bribem for bribery with circumstantial evidence if need be. Remember the Politician does not directly have to benefit from selling his power his family can benefit and it is still bribery. We all know the Biden family has benefited from their one asset.

:yayaseesathreadban::yayaseesathreadban:

:thisisgettinggood::thisisgettinggood:
 
Last edited:
Not a single fact witness implicating Joe. It’s nothing but Hunter.

Laughable.
See folks even Hunter's partners say they were selling Joke Bribem and Hunter said they only had one asset. So yes we have witnesses that implicate Joke Bribem that is exactly what circumstantial evidence does it implies. When you have twenty trees in a straight row you don't have to see them planted to know they were planted by a human not naturally.
 
Here is one of the VERY FIRST exchanges on this data, and as always you can see the Republican has no answer to allegations that can be backed up by an iota of fact or evidence. Just empty claims thrown against the wall.

Jump to 0.44 seconds in for the key exchange.



It is just a complete embarrassment for the Republi'cans'.
 
Here is one of the VERY FIRST exchanges on this data, and as always you can see the Republican has no answer to allegations that can be backed up by an iota of fact or evidence. Just empty claims thrown against the wall.

Jump to 0.44 seconds in for the key exchange.



It is just a complete embarrassment for the Republi'cans'.
You are going to be so disappointed :laugh:
 
See folks even Hunter's partners say they were selling Joke Bribem and Hunter said they only had one asset. So yes we have witnesses that implicate Joke Bribem that is exactly what circumstantial evidence does it implies. When you have twenty trees in a straight row you don't have to see them planted to know they were planted by a human not naturally.

I’ll repeat for the ignorant.

Only 3 witnesses and not a fact witness among them.

Laughable analogy on the trees, but I’ll play. You’re trying to have Joe plant those 20 trees, when it was actually Hunter. Or even somebody else.

Yeah, we all know Hunter was trying to sell the name. Big fucking deal. It’s done all the time in business.
 
Here is one of the VERY FIRST exchanges on this data, and as always you can see the Republican has no answer to allegations that can be backed up by an iota of fact or evidence. Just empty claims thrown against the wall.

Jump to 0.44 seconds in for the key exchange.



It is just a complete embarrassment for the Republi'cans'.

I heard that exchange this morning. This guy got his ass handed to him. How embarrassing for him. He should shoot whoever sent him out there.
 
House GOP to present evidence against Biden in first impeachment hearing
First hearing out of impeachment inquiry against Biden begins Thursday at 10 am

House Republicans on Thursday morning are set to hold their first impeachment inquiry public hearing, where they will present all evidence uncovered to date as part of their investigation into the Biden family’s business dealings while examining "the value" of the inquiry.


The House Oversight Committee, led by Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., will "examine the value of an impeachment inquiry and present evidence House Republicans have uncovered to date regarding President Joe Biden's knowledge of and role in his family's domestic and international business practices," according to the panel. The hearing is to begin at 10 a.m.

Bruce Dubinsky, a forensic accountant with decades of experience in financial investigations and consulting – and who the committee says has testified in more than 80 trials, including trials that involved financial fraud – will testify, along with former Assistant Attorney General Eileen O'Connor, who served in the Department of Justice Tax Division.

Law professor and Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley, who testified in the Clinton and Trump impeachments, will also testify.

The House Oversight and Accountability Committee has uncovered a mountain of evidence revealing how Joe Biden abused his public office for his family’s financial gain," Comer is expected to say in his opening statement. "For years, President Biden has lied to the American people about his knowledge of and participation in his family’s corrupt business schemes."

"Evidence reveals that then-Vice President Joe Biden spoke, dined, and developed relationships with his family’s foreign business targets. These business targets include foreign oligarchs who sent millions of dollars to his family," Comer is expected to say. "It also includes a Chinese national who wired a quarter of a million dollars to his son."

Comer was referring to subpoenaed Hunter Biden financial records, which revealed he received two wires originating from Beijing and linked to BHR Partners in 2019.
Fox News Digital first reported that Hunter Biden received the wire payments, which originated in Beijing, for more than $250,000 from Chinese business partners during the summer of 2019 — wires that listed the Delaware home of Joe Biden as the beneficiary address for the funds.

The White House declined to comment.

"To date, the House Oversight Committee has uncovered how the Bidens and their associates created over 20 shell companies and raked in over $24 million dollars," Comer will say, adding that the committee has also "identified nine members of the Biden family who have participated in or benefited from these business schemes."

"What were the Bidens selling to make all this money? Joe Biden himself," Comer will say. "The American people demand accountability for this culture of corruption." .....This should


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ho...esent-evidence-against-biden-in-first-hearing
================================
This is must see TV set your DVR . I have been asking liberals for months now what Service or Products are the Biden family selling that is worth 10s of millions of dollars. I know democrats will say there is no evidence. Criminals tend to try to hide their crimes. Slow Joe Bribem isn't very smart but he is or was smart enough to try to hide his bribery. But like most criminals he has lived beyond his means. Hunter said in a text the Biden family has only one asset. We all know who that one asset is. That one asset sprung into action with quid pro quo for Mykola Zlochevsky to save Burisma from investigation by Shokin. To the liberals here that parrot "there is no evidence" you need to watch this investigation today. We convict people for murder so we can impeach Joke Bribem for bribery with circumstantial evidence if need be. Remember the Politician does not directly have to benefit from selling his power his family can benefit and it is still bribery. We all know the Biden family has benefited from their one asset.

:yayaseesathreadban::yayaseesathreadban:

:thisisgettinggood::thisisgettinggood:

This should have happened on day one
 
I’ll repeat for the ignorant.

Only 3 witnesses and not a fact witness among them.

Laughable analogy on the trees, but I’ll play. You’re trying to have Joe plant those 20 trees, when it was actually Hunter. Or even somebody else.

Yeah, we all know Hunter was trying to sell the name. Big fucking deal. It’s done all the time in business.

So you are saying Joe is a victim of Hunter. :rofl2: Stop you are hurting my sides :rofl2:
 
As someone who expects facts and evidence to support accusations I already am greatly disappointed. Thx.
You are a disappointment :rofl2: You should watch this inquiry. You are in denial is amusing :laugh: What product or service was Hunter selling that was worth 10s of millions of dollars? Enlighten me :laugh:
 
You are a disappointment :rofl2: You should watch this inquiry. You are in denial is amusing :laugh: What product or service was Hunter selling that was worth 10s of millions of dollars? Enlighten me :laugh:

Hunter can sell whatever the fuck he wants. He can say 'I am able to crap gold' and charge any derp willing to pay him, millions of dollars.

If he crosses a legal line doing that, then he gets prosecuted.

Joe does not. That is not how the law works. We do not punish the parents for the sins of the sons (kids) but if you want to try and press that law, go for it.

Re the hearings, can you point me to a single fact that is not 'what Hunter did' and instead is what 'Joe did'?

Because every Republican asked on tv interviews, including on friendly right wing derp media, says they 'HAVE NO FACTS CONNECTING JOE.. BUT THEY ARE WORKING ON IT' or some version of that.
 
Hunter can sell whatever the fuck he wants. He can say 'I am able to crap gold' and charge any derp willing to pay him, millions of dollars.

If he crosses a legal line doing that, then he gets prosecuted.

Joe does not. That is not how the law works. We do not punish the parents for the sins of the sons (kids) but if you want to try and press that law, go for it.

Re the hearings, can you point me to a single fact that is not 'what Hunter did' and instead is what 'Joe did'?

Because every Republican asked on tv interviews, including on friendly right wing derp media, says they 'HAVE NO FACTS CONNECTING JOE.. BUT THEY ARE WORKING ON IT' or some version of that.

He can't sell Joe Biden's influence and pay Joe's bills with the proceeds.
 
So you are saying Joe is a victim of Hunter. :rofl2: Stop you are hurting my sides :rofl2:

LOL

I always have to laugh at the “so, you are saying…” bullshit.

What I am saying, dumbfuck, is very clear. Always is.

3 witnesses. Not one fact witness.

Joe did not “plant the trees”, no matter how much you wanted him to.

Hunter used the name, Biden, to further his own interests.

Is that clear enough, Cletus, or do you need a literate 10 year old to explain it to you?
 
LOL

I always have to laugh at the “so, you are saying…” bullshit.

What I am saying, dumbfuck, is very clear. Always is.

3 witnesses. Not one fact witness.

Joe did not “plant the trees”, no matter how much you wanted him to.

Hunter used the name, Biden, to further his own interests.

Is that clear enough, Cletus, or do you need a literate 10 year old to explain it to you?
These are just the first witnesses ;)
 
He can't sell Joe Biden's influence and pay Joe's bills with the proceeds.

And that is the problem you have as those two points are EXACTLY the thing the republi'cans' admit repeatedly they have no proof of.


i will explain to you again the ugly waters of legal and shady lobbying or selling the perception of influence, in a way a child should understand.

If you, ExpressLane, were to achieve a high office, like King Derp, or Governor or POTUS, instantly you would have family members (kids, siblings, etc), ex business partners, and even just friends, WHO COULD LEGALLY enter the lobbying world, or join Boards, etc, and would be pursued for such, based on the fact that they know you and the hope that relationship could potentially garner the Lobby group, or corporation some benefits.

THERE IS NOTHING ILLEGAL ABOUT THAT SENTENCE NO MATTER HOW DISTASTEFUL WE MIGHT FIND IT, ESPECIALLY IF THE PERSON HAS NO QUALIFICATIONS OTHER THAN WHO HE KNOWS.

So now, ExpressLane does have a family member and prior business colleague who are both cashing on that relationship.

What laws has ExpressLane broke so far?

None. those guys are selling the PERCEIVED access to you but as long as it can NEVER be demonstrated YOU did something wrong or illegal, you are not responsible for what they did, WHICH IS ALSO LEGAL.



And that is it ExpressLane. The ENTIRETY of what you guys do is point to Expresslanes sibling and/or business partner and say 'What do you think they are selling'....' Thus Expresslane is guilty'. And that is just wrong. And stupid.
 
Back
Top