HAHAHA. One of the trump 18 pleads guilty but gets ZERO PUNISHMENT!

LurchAddams said:
And in return rolls over on trump and other defendants. It's called "plea-bargaining". You roll over, aka "flip" a little fish to get to a much bigger one. I don't see why you're celebrating.

He's going to sing like a canary.
Click to expand...

The original poster is too fucking stupid to realize this is precisely what the prosecution was hoping for. I could care less if they all walk to get the couple big ones at the top.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Plea-bargaining is not at all the same as witness tampering, you ignorant tranny. If the state charges you with murder but let's you plead to manslaughter to avoid an expensive trial, that is ok.
Click to expand...

It's also fine that some of those 18 flip and testify with the truth, that allows us to get one more guilty verdict for your fuhrer. You don't like that, tough shit.
 
Port Tack said:
The original poster is too fucking stupid to realize this is precisely what the prosecution was hoping for. I could care less if they all walk to get the couple big ones at the top.
Click to expand...

I know. It's the same right-wing victimhood that's inciting the trumptards to claim all elections they lose are stolen.
 
Port Tack said:
It's also fine that some of those 18 flip and testify with the truth, that allows us to get one more guilty verdict for your fuhrer. You don't like that, tough shit.
Click to expand...

If they testify and get nothing in return, that is fine. But that's not the case. They have been promised a light penalty if they say what the state wants. That is witness tampering and only a moron cannot see that. Same as paying them money.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
No question there was cheating in PA. The state constitution bans no-excuse mail-in voting but the dem gov sent out millions of such ballots.
Click to expand...

We've had this conversation. Mail-in voting is allowed by PA statute. During the 2020 election, social distancing required it. Ergo, there WAS an excuse.
 
LurchAddams said:
We've had this conversation. Mail-in voting is allowed by PA statute. During the 2020 election, social distancing required it. Ergo, there WAS an excuse.
Click to expand...

But it is not allowed by the PA constitution. The constitution had to be amended to allow no-excuse mail-in voting and it wasn't. Every election in PA that day should have been thrown out. THINK
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
But it is not allowed by the PA constitution. The constitution had to be amended to allow no-excuse mail-in voting and it wasn't. Every election in PA that day should have been thrown out. THINK
Click to expand...

We're not going to agree on this. The trump campaign launched over 60 lawsuits, most adjudicated by trump-appointed judges. All were lost. The 2020 election was decided fairly according to the courts.

Here's an artical about trump's challenge in PA.

https://apnews.com/article/judge-throws-out-trump-suit-pennsylvania-87eaf4df86d5f6ccc343c3385c9ba86c

"HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A federal judge issued a scathing order Saturday dismissing the Trump campaign’s futile effort to block the certification of votes in Pennsylvania, shooting down claims of widespread irregularities with mail-in ballots.

The case was always a long shot to stop President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration, but it was President Donald Trump’s best hope to affect the election results through the courts, mostly because of the number of electoral votes, 20, at stake in Pennsylvania. His personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, stepped into a courtroom for the first time in decades to argue the case this past week.

U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Brann wrote in his order that Trump had asked the court to disenfranchise almost 7 million voters."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top