friggin liars (I mean lawyers)

Saying it is somehow bad that she went to 6 collages is about as bad as calling out lawmakers for being lawyers....
 
The majority of our leaders should be lawyers, they are the people who have studied the government and its systems and structure at a graduate level.

Just like you want your Doctor to have gone to med school, I want my government officials to have gone to law school.

The vast majority of our founding fathers and the framers of our constitution were lawyers!

Again, why is it bad for our lawmakers to have studied the law?
 
To be a Vice President you should have a solid grasp of history and the American legal system....

To be the judge of a spelling bee, you should have a solid grasp of the ability to spell.
 
The majority of our leaders should be lawyers, they are the people who have studied the government and its systems and structure at a graduate level.

Just like you want your Doctor to have gone to med school, I want my government officials to have gone to law school.

The vast majority of our founding fathers and the framers of our constitution were lawyers!

You guys just want to keep ignoring this one? I can understand why...

Why is it bad for our lawmakers to have studied the law?
 
To be a Vice President you should have a solid grasp of history and the American legal system....

To be the judge of a spelling bee, you should have a solid grasp of the ability to spell.
It has nothing to do with your spelling ability.
 
The majority of our leaders should be lawyers, they are the people who have studied the government and its systems and structure at a graduate level.

Just like you want your Doctor to have gone to med school, I want my government officials to have gone to law school.

The vast majority of our founding fathers and the framers of our constitution were lawyers!

Again, anyone?
 
Again, anyone?
Fine.

Our founders had a much larger mix of other professions then is evinced in the leadership of either party.

(BTW - I am only answering this so that you don't post eleventy-billion threads asking this same question over and over and over again.)
 
So, the meaning of your criptic comment?
A person who can't even remember enough personal history to actually hold a conversation without directly contradicting that history cannot judge another for not knowing enough history.
 
A person who can't even remember enough personal history to actually hold a conversation without directly contradicting that history cannot judge another for not knowing enough history.

Who cannot remember personal history enough to hold a conversation?
 
Back
Top