House can’t pass resolution for Israel!

If that's true then j6 didn't happen in a vacuum.

Sure didn’t. Trump had been setting things up for months and years for his brainless followers. Fake news. Stolen election. The Clinton “lock her up” rhetoric. Labeling every critic of his as the enemy. Sympathetic comments for the RW extremists. Publicly undermining our institutions, including our vets. On and on.

Be sure, though. The fuckers that participated in the J6 riot are hardly any victims. And, thank goodness, the courts are the one institution that came through. The seditionists will be locked up until they are old men and Trump could well follow.
 
The majority is supposed to govern... Why didn't the Republicans vote for Hakeem Jeffries?

Your guys were the one that voted with the "maga republicans" you supposedly hate. There was no option to vote for Hakeem Jeffries on that vote, it was either to keep or get rid of the Speaker.
 
The majority is supposed to govern... Why didn't the Republicans vote for Hakeem Jeffries?

Your guys were the one that voted with the "maga republicans" you supposedly hate. There was no option to vote for Hakeem Jeffries on that vote, it was either to keep or get rid of the Speaker.
 
Your guys were the one that voted with the "maga republicans" you supposedly hate. There was no option to vote for Hakeem Jeffries on that vote, it was either to keep or get rid of the Speaker.

They could have voted for Jeffries in the first place and then this wouldn't have happened.

I am not in the House BTW, so those aren't my guys.
 
They could have voted for Jeffries in the first place and then this wouldn't have happened.

I am not in the House BTW, so those aren't my guys.

They didn't have to. They elected a Speaker.

Only one group voted with the "maga republicans" to "punish" the speaker and get rid of that Speaker that compromised with Democrats. Your representatives elected to join with "Maga Republicans" to punish and get rid of a Speaker that compromised and worked with Democrats. Good job, Democrats!
 
He did not GIVE them anything, how do you GIVE someone something that was already theirs? LIAR!

He released it to them or GAVE it to them. More leftist bran dead word play. AGAIN i get it I wouldn't want to have to defend the diaper wearing idiot you elected either.
 
He released it to them or GAVE it to them. More leftist bran dead word play. AGAIN i get it I wouldn't want to have to defend the diaper wearing idiot you elected either.


He has not released it to them, they do not currently have access to it. Why do you keep lying or are you really dumb?
 
He released it to them or GAVE it to them. More leftist bran dead word play. AGAIN i get it I wouldn't want to have to defend the diaper wearing idiot you elected either.

You lied when you said “give”, give and release, have significant differences in their meetings.
 
If we get a speaker.

We will. Soon. We could have had one if the Democrats didn't agree with MAGA Republicans that the Speaker should be punished and lose his gavel for working with Democrats. But hey, Democrats wanted to make sure that the Speaker was punished for working with them.
 
We will. Soon. We could have had one if the Democrats didn't agree with MAGA Republicans that the Speaker should be punished and lose his gavel for working with Democrats. But hey, Democrats wanted to make sure that the Speaker was punished for working with them.

We would also have one if the Maga Republicans hadn’t kicked McCarthy out, or if the Republicans have voted for Hakeem Jeffries.
 
We will. Soon. We could have had one if the Democrats didn't agree with MAGA Republicans that the Speaker should be punished and lose his gavel for working with Democrats. But hey, Democrats wanted to make sure that the Speaker was punished for working with them.

When you say soon, what do you mean? This week?
 
We would also have one if the Maga Republicans hadn’t kicked McCarthy out, or if the Republicans have voted for Hakeem Jeffries.

They couldn't kick him out without the support of the Democrats who wanted to punish McCarthy for working with Democrats.
 
When you say soon, what do you mean? This week?

It really doesn't matter, Jarod. Soon there will be a Speaker, and he won't be a compromise Speaker because we know that compromising with Democrats only makes them join with Maga Republicans to punish you for it. Even the smallest attempt to reach across that aisle and the Democrats voted to punish him for it.
 
There isn't a need for the constant invectives. It really lowers the tone of the discussions on this board.

It's generally also a sign of weakness in an argument when someone relies on them heavily, as well.

on the other hand your lies are also a sign of weakness......maybe the first year you were here I would have paid attention to what you say....now?...you're just another BP or Domer........
 
Sorry, I was having lunch with a friend. Sorry, you are so triggered over me stepping away for a bit…

I wasn't commenting on the fact you didn't reply quickly.....I was commenting on the fact you never reply honestly.......you're running from the truth even when you're standing here.....
 
Back
Top